In the second paper of the two part study of membrane microair vehicles, computations are performed for a plunging membrane airfoil. The computational model uses a sixth-order finite difference solution of the Navier–Stokes equations coupled to a finite element solution of a set of nonlinear string equations. The effect, on the structural and fluid response, of plunging Strouhal number, reduced frequency, and static angle of attack is examined. Qualitatively, the flow field is found to be very complex with interactions of vortices shed from various locations along the chord of the airfoil. At a low angle of attack and a low Strouhal number, increasing reduced frequency results in a decrease and an increase in the mean sectional lift and drag coefficients, respectively. Also, at a low angle of attack, increasing the Strouhal number has minimal effect at high and low values of reduced frequencies, but a significant effect is found at an intermediate value of reduced frequency. When the effect of angle of attack is studied for fixed values of Strouhal number and reduced frequency, it is found that the act of plunging gives improved mean sectional lift when compared with the case of a fixed flexible airfoil. The improvement does not increase monotonically with the angle of attack but instead is maximum at an intermediate value. Finally, increasing the value of the membrane prestrain, which stiffens the airfoil, results in a reduced value of the sectional lift coefficient for a given Strouhal number, reduced frequency, and angle of attack.

1.
Weis-Fogh
,
T.
, 1973, “
Quick Estimates of Flight Fitness in Hovering Animals, Including Novel Mechanisms for Lift Production
,”
J. Exp. Biol.
0022-0949,
59
, pp.
169
230
.
2.
Lighthill
,
M.
, 1969, “
Hydromechanics of Aquatic Animal Propulsion
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
0066-4189,
1
, pp.
413
446
.
3.
Rayner
,
J.
, 2001, “
Thrust and Drag in Flying Birds: Applications to Birdlike Micro Air Vehicles
,”
Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications
,
T. J.
Mueller
, ed.,
AIAA
,
Reston, VA
, Vol.
195
, pp.
217
230
.
4.
Lee
,
J. -S.
,
Kim
,
J. -H.
, and
Kim
,
C.
, 2008, “
Numerical Study of the Unsteady-Force-Generation Mechanism of Insect Flapping Motion
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
46
(
7
), pp.
1835
1848
.
5.
Isogai
,
K.
,
Shinmoto
,
Y.
, and
Watanabe
,
Y.
, 1999, “
Effects of Dynamic Stall on Propulsive Efficiency and Thrust of Flapping Airfoil
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
37
(
10
), pp.
1145
1151
.
6.
Hall
,
K.
, and
Hall
,
S.
, 2001, “
A Rational Engineering Analysis of the Efficiency of Flapping Flight
,”
Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications
,
T. J.
Mueller
, ed.,
AIAA
,
Reston, VA
, Vol.
195
, pp.
249
274
.
7.
Szmelter
,
J.
, and
Żbikowski
,
R.
, 2002, “
A Study of Flow Arising From Insect Wing Flapping Motion
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
0271-2091,
40
, pp.
497
505
.
8.
Tuncer
,
I.
,
Walz
,
R.
, and
Platzer
,
M.
, 1998, “
A Computational Study of the Dynamic Stall of a Flapping Airfoil
,” AIAA Paper No. 98-2519.
9.
Ellington
,
C.
,
van den Berg
,
C.
,
Willmott
,
A. P.
, and
Thomas
,
A.
, 1996, “
Leading Edge Vortices in Insect Flight
,”
Nature (London)
0028-0836,
384
, pp.
626
630
.
10.
van den Berg
,
C.
, and
Ellington
,
C.
, 1997, “
The Vortex Wake of a ‘Hovering’ Model Hawkmoth
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B
0962-8436,
352
, pp.
317
328
.
11.
van den Berg
,
C.
, and
Ellington
,
C.
, 1997, “
The Three-Dimensional Leading-Edge Vortex of a ‘Hovering’ Model Hawkmoth
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B
0962-8436,
352
, pp.
329
340
.
12.
Willmot
,
A.
, and
Ellington
,
C.
, 1997, “
The Mechanics of Flight in the Hawkmoth Manduca Sexta. I. Kinematics of Hovering and Forward Flight
,”
J. Exp. Biol.
0022-0949,
200
, pp.
2705
2722
.
13.
Combes
,
S.
, and
Daniel
,
T.
, 2003, “
Flexural Stiffness in Insect Wings. II. Spatial Distribution and Dynamic Wing Bending
,”
J. Exp. Biol.
0022-0949,
206
, pp.
2989
2997
.
14.
Steppan
,
S.
, 2000, “
Flexural Stiffness Patterns of Butterfly Wings (Papilionoidea)
,”
J. Res. Lepid.
,
35
, pp.
61
77
.
15.
Wootton
,
R.
, 1981, “
Support and Deformability in Insect Wings
,”
J. Zool.
0022-5460,
193
, pp.
447
468
.
16.
Betts
,
C.
, 1986, “
Functioning of the Wings and Axillary Sclerites of Heteroptera During Flight
,”
J. Zool., Lond. B
,
1
, pp.
283
301
.
17.
Rojratsirikul
,
P.
,
Wang
,
Z.
, and
Gursul
,
I.
, 2008, “
Unsteady Aerodynamics of Membrane Airfoils
,” presented at the
46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
, Reno, NV, Jan. 7–10, AIAA Paper 2008-0613.
18.
Carrier
,
G.
, 1945, “
On the Nonlinear Vibration Problem of the Elastic String
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
0033-569X,
3
, pp.
157
165
.
19.
Carrier
,
G.
, 1945, “
A Note on the Vibrating String
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
0033-569X,
7
, pp.
97
101
.
20.
Attar
,
P.
, and
Gordnier
,
R.
, 2009, “
High Fidelity Computational Aeroelastic Analysis of a Plunging Membrane Airfoil
,” submitted to
50th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
, Palm Springs, CA.
You do not currently have access to this content.