The effect of leading-edge geometry on the wake/boundary-layer interaction was studied in a low-speed single-stage HP compressor. Both a 3:1 elliptic and a circular leading edge were tested on a controlled diffusion aerofoil stator blade. Experiments were undertaken on the stator suction surface; these included hotwire boundary-layer traverses, surface hotfilm measurements, and high resolution leading-edge pressure measurements. Steady computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions were also performed to aid the interpretation of the results. The two leading-edge shapes gave rise to significantly different flows. For a blade with an elliptic leading edge (Blade A), the leading-edge boundary layer remained attached and laminar in the absence of wakes. The wake presence led to the formation of a thickened laminar boundary layer in which turbulent disturbances were observed to form. Measurements of the trailing-edge boundary layer indicated that the wake/leading-edge interaction for Blade A raised the suction-surface loss by 20%. For a blade with a circular leading edge (Blade B), the leading-edge boundary-layer exhibited a separation bubble, which was observed to reattach laminar in the absence of wakes. The presence of the wake moved the separation position forward while inducing a turbulent reattachment upstream of the leading-edge time-average reattachment position. This produced a region of very high momentum thickness at the leading edge. The suction-surface loss was found to be 38% higher for Blade B than for Blade A. Wake traverses downstream of the blades were used to determine the total profile loss of each blade. The profile loss of Blade B was measured to be 32% higher than that of Blade A.

1.
Walraevens
,
R. E.
, and
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
, 1995, “
Leading Edge Separation Bubbles on Turbomachinery Blades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
117
, pp.
115
125
.
2.
Wheeler
,
A. P. S.
,
Miller
,
R. J.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 2006, “
The Effect of Wake Induced Structures on Compressor Boundary-Layers
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90892.
3.
Henderson
,
A.
,
Walker
,
G. J.
, and
Hughes
,
J.
, 2006, “
Unsteady Transition Phenomena at a Compressor Leading-Edge
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90641.
4.
Bolger
,
J. J.
, 1999, “
Three-Dimensional Design of Compressor Blades
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
5.
Place
,
J. M. M.
, 1997, “
Three-Dimensional Flow in Axial Compressors
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
6.
Sofia
,
A.
, 2006, “
The Effect of Wakes on Leading Edge Loss
,” MS thesis, ETH Zürich.
7.
Gbadebo
,
S. A.
, 2003, “
Three-Dimensional Separations in Compressors
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
8.
Bindon
,
J. P.
, 1987, “
Pressure Distributions in the Tip Clearance Region of an Unshrouded Axial Turbine as Affecting the Problem of Tip Burnout
,” ASME Paper No. 87-GT-230.
9.
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Huntsman
,
I.
, and
Steele
,
A. B.
, 1994, “
An Investigation of Boundary-Layer Development in a Multistage LP Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
116
, pp.
375
383
.
10.
Drela
,
M.
, and
Youngren
,
H.
, A user’s guide to MISES 2.56.
11.
Abu-Ghannam
,
B. J.
, and
Shaw
,
R.
, 1980, “
Natural Transition of Boundary-Layers—The Effects of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient and Flow History
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0022-2542,
22
(
5
), pp.
213
228
.
12.
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
,
Dong
,
Y.
, and
Li
,
Y. S.
, 1995, “
Compressor Blade Boundary Layers in the Presence of Wakes
,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-443.
13.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
14.
Smith
,
L. H.
, 1996, “
Wake Mixing in Axial Flow Compressors
,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-029.
You do not currently have access to this content.