Current turbomachinery design systems increasingly rely on multistage CFD as a means to diagnose designs and assess performance potential. However, design weaknesses attributed to improper stage matching are addressed using often ineffective strategies involving a costly iterative loop between blading modification, revision of design intent, and further evaluation of aerodynamic performance. A scheme is proposed herein which greatly simplifies the design point blade row matching process. It is based on a three-dimensional viscous inverse method that has been extended to allow blading analysis and design in a multi-blade row environment. For computational expediency, blade row coupling is achieved through an averaging-plane approximation. To limit computational time, the inverse method was parallelized. The proposed method allows improvement of design point blade row matching by direct regulation of the circulation capacity of the blading within a multistage environment. During the design calculation, blade shapes are adjusted to account for inflow and outflow conditions while producing a prescribed pressure loading. Thus, it is computationally ensured that the intended pressure-loading distribution is consistent with the derived blading geometry operating in a multiblade row environment that accounts for certain blade row interactions. The viability of the method is demonstrated in design exercises involving the rotors of a 2.5 stage, highly loaded compressor. Individually redesigned rotors display mismatching when run in the 2.5 stage, evident as a deviation from design intent. However, simultaneous redesign of the rotors in their multistage environment produces the design intent, indicating that aerodynamic matching has been achieved.

1.
Adamczyk
,
J. J.
, 2000, “
Aerodynamic Analysis of Multistage Turbomachinery Flows in Support of Aerodynamic Design
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
, pp.
189
217
.
2.
Gallimore
,
S. J.
, 1999, “
Axial Flow Compressor Design
,”
Developments in Turbomachinery Design
,
J.
Denton
, ed.,
American Institution of Mechanical Engineers
.
3.
Marble
,
F. E.
, 1964, “
Three-Dimensional Flow in Turbomachines
,”
High Speed Aerodynamics and Jet Propulsion, Vol. X, Aerodynamics of Turbines and Compressors
,
W. R.
Hawthorne
, ed.,
Princeton University Press
,
Princeton, NJ
, pp.
83
165
.
4.
Dang
,
T. Q.
, 1995, ‘ ‘
Inverse Method for Turbomachine Blades Using Shock-Capturing Techniques
,” AIAA Paper No. 95-2465.
5.
Qiu
,
X.
, 1999, “
Improved Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Inverse Method
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
6.
Damle
,
S.
,
Dang
,
T.
,
Stringham
,
J.
, and
Razinsky
,
E.
, 1999, “
Practical Use of a 3D Viscous Inverse Method for the Design of Compressor Blade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
121
(
2
), pp.
321
325
.
7.
Qiu
,
X.
, and
Dang
,
T.
, 2000, “
3D Inverse Method for Turbomachine Blading With Splitter Blades
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-526.
8.
Dang
,
T.
,
Damle
,
S.
, and
Qiu
,
X.
, 2000, “
Euler-Based Inverse Method for Turbomachine Blades: Part II—Three Dimensions
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
38
(
11
), pp.
2007
2013
.
9.
Medd
,
A. J.
, 2002, “
Enhanced Inverse Design Code and Development of Design Strategies for Transonic Compressor Blading
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
10.
Jameson
,
A.
,
Schmidt
,
W.
, and
Turkel
,
E.
, 1981, “
Numerical Solution of the Euler Equations by Finite Volume Methods Using Runge-Kutta Time-Stepping Schemes
,” AIAA Paper No. 81-1259.
11.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1992, “
The Calculation of Three Dimensional Viscous Flow Through Multistage Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
, pp.
18
26
.
12.
Wadia
,
A. R.
, and
Beacher
,
B. F.
, 1990, “
Three-Dimensional Relief in Turbomachinery Blading
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
112
, pp.
587
598
.
13.
Reid
,
L.
, and
Moore
,
R. D.
, 1978, “
Design and Overall Performance of Four Highly-Loaded, High-Speed Inlet Stages for an Advanced, High-Pressure-Ratio Core Compressor
,” NASA TP-1337.
14.
Reid
,
L.
, and
Moore
,
R. D.
, 1980, “
Experimental Study of Low Aspect Ratio Compressor Blading
,” ASME Paper No. 80-GT-6.
15.
Hall
,
E. J.
, and
Delaney
,
R. A.
, 1995, “
Investigation of Advanced Counterrotation Blade Configuration Concepts for High Speed Turboprop Systems: Task VII-ADPAC User’s Manual
,” NASA CR-195472.
16.
Dawes
,
W. N.
, 1992, “
Toward Improved Throughflow Capability: The Use of Three-Dimensional Viscous Flow Solvers in a Multistage Environment
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
, pp.
8
17
.
17.
Chima
,
R. V.
, 1998, “
Calculation of Multistage Turbomachinery Using Steady Characteristic Boundary Conditions
,” NASA Technical Memorandum, No. 206613.
18.
Giles
,
M. B.
, 1990, “
Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for Euler Equation Calculations
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
28
, pp.
2050
2058
.
19.
Gropp
,
W.
,
Lusk
,
E.
,
Doss
,
N.
, and
Skjellum
,
A.
, 1996, “
A High-Performance, Portable Implementation of the MPI Message Passing Interface Standard
,”
Parallel Comput.
0167-8191,
22
, pp.
789
828
.
20.
Gropp
,
W. D.
, and
Lusk
,
E.
, 1996, “
Guide for a Portable Implementation of MPI
,” ANL-96/6, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory.
21.
Larosiliere
,
L. M.
,
Wood
,
J. R.
,
Hathaway
,
M. D.
,
Medd
,
A. J.
, and
Dang
,
T. Q.
, 2002, “
Aerodynamic Design Study of an Advanced Multistage Axial Compressor
,” NASA TP-211568.
22.
Medd
,
A. J.
,
Dang
,
T. Q.
, and
Larosiliere
,
L. M.
, 2003, “
3D Inverse Design Loading Strategy for Transonic Axial Compressor Blading
,” ASME Paper No. 2003-GT-38501.
You do not currently have access to this content.