This paper presents the effect of a single spanwise two-dimensional wire upon the downstream position of boundary layer transition under steady and unsteady inflow conditions. The study is carried out on a high turning, high-speed, low pressure turbine (LPT) profile designed to take account of the unsteady flow conditions. The experiments were carried out in a transonic cascade wind tunnel to which a rotating bar system had been added. The range of Reynolds and Mach numbers studied includes realistic LPT engine conditions and extends up to the transonic regime. Losses are measured to quantify the influence of the roughness with and without wake passing. Time resolved measurements such as hot wire boundary layer surveys and surface unsteady pressure are used to explain the state of the boundary layer. The results suggest that the effect of roughness on boundary layer transition is a stability governed phenomena, even at high Mach numbers. The combination of the effect of the roughness elements with the inviscid Kelvin–Helmholtz instability responsible for the rolling up of the separated shear layer (Stieger, R. D., 2002, Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University) is also examined. Wake traverses using pneumatic probes downstream of the cascade reveal that the use of roughness elements reduces the profile losses up to exit Mach numbers of 0.8. This occurs with both steady and unsteady inflow conditions.

1.
Ramesh
,
O. N.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Harvey
,
N. W.
, 2001, “
Separation Control in Ultra-High Lift Airfoils by Unsteadiness and Surface Roughness
,”
15th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines
,
Bangalore
, India, Sept.
2.
Roman
,
K. M.
, 2002, “
The Effect of Selective Roughness and Wake Unsteadiness on the Performance of Low Pressure Turbine Blades
,” M.Phil. thesis, Cambridge University.
3.
Zhang
,
X. F.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 2003, “
Parametric Study of Surface Roughness and Wake Unsteadiness on a Flat Plate with Large Pressure Gradient
,”
10th ISUAAAT Durham NC
, Sep 7–11.
4.
Brinich
,
P. F.
, 1954, “
Boundary Layer Transition at Mach 3.12 with and without Single Roughness Element
,” NACA TN 3267.
5.
Gibbings
,
J. C.
, 1959, “
On Boundary-Layer Transition Wires
,” C.P.No. 462, A.R.C. Technical Report, Department of Fluid Mechanics,
University of Liverpool
.
6.
Klebanoff
,
P. S.
, and
Tidstrom
,
K. D.
, 1972, “
Mechanism by Which a Two-Dimensional Roughness Element Induces Boundary-Layer Transition
,”
Phys. Fluids
0031-9171,
15
(
7
), pp.
1173
1188
.
7.
Mack
, 1969, “
Boundary Layer Stability Theory
,” Document 900-277, Rev. A, Jet Propulsion Lab., Pasadena, California.
8.
Doorly
,
D. J.
, 1984, “
A Study of the Effect of Wake Passing on Turbine Blades
,” Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University.
9.
Vera
,
M.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Vazquez
,
R.
, 2003, “
The Effect of Mach Number on LP Turbine Wake-Blade Interaction
,”
10th ISUAAAT Durham NC
, Sep 7–11.
10.
Sieverding
,
C.
, and
Maretto
,
L.
, 1974, “
Design and Calibration of Four Probes for Using in the Transonic Cascade Testing
,”
von Karman Institute
, Tech. Note 100.
11.
Vera Morales
,
M.
, 2004, “
The Effect of Compressibility on Unsteady Boundary Layers in High Lift Low Pressure Turbines
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University.
12.
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 1984, “
Measurements of Wake-Generated Unsteadiness in the Rotor Passages of Axial Flow Turbines
,” ASME Paper 84-GT-189.
13.
Cox
,
R. N.
, 1957, “
Wall Neighborhood Measurements in Turbulent Boundary Layers Using Hot-Wire Anemometer
,” A.R.C. Report 19101, February.
14.
Johnson
,
M. W.
, 1993, “
A Bypass Transition Model for Boundary Layers
,” ASME Paper 93-GT-90.
15.
Stieger
,
R. D.
, 2002, “
The Effects of Wakes on Separating Boundary Layers in Low Pressure Turbines
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University.
16.
Zhang
,
X. F.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
, 2004, “
The Combined Effects of Surface Trips and Unsteady Wakes on the Boundary Layer Development of an Ultra-High-Lift LP Turbine Blade
,” ASME Paper GT2004-53081.
You do not currently have access to this content.