This paper addresses the use of 5-hole probes in the testing of industrial centrifugal compressors. The 5-hole probes utilized for this work are of the conical-tip type and were used in a non-nulling configuration (i.e., the probes do not need to be rotated or moved in any way during the tests). These 5-hole probes proved to be fairly robust, making them practical for a nonlaboratory setting such as an industrial multistage compressor test stand. A discussion of 5-hole probes and how they function is provided, including an overview of the mathematical formulations and calibrations required to translate the pressure data gathered from the 5 holes into static and total pressures, velocities and flow angles. A method to transform these variables from a probe-based coordinate system to a machine-based coordinate system is also presented and schematics of this process are provided to aid the reader’s understanding. The testing performed on a prototype multistage centrifugal compressor using 5-hole probes is also discussed, showing that the probes provided valuable insight into the flowfield exiting the impellers and at the return bend. The hub-to-shroud velocity profile exiting an impeller was found to be more skewed than expected and was contributing to poor performance in the downstream stationary components. The measured flowfield from one of the tests is also compared against 3-D CFD results and comments are offered regarding the agreement between the analytical and measured results. Advantages and disadvantages of 5-hole probes as compared to more conventional instrumentation are presented. Finally, conclusions are drawn regarding the value of 5-hole probe data in the development and/or troubleshooting of high performance turbomachinery and in the validation/calibration of design and analysis tools.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
compressors, machine testing, rotational flow, flow measurement, calibration, probes, confined flow
Topics:
Flow (Dynamics), Probes, Compressors, Machinery
1.
Sorokes
,
J. M.
, and
Koch
,
J. M.
,
1996
, “
The Use of Single and Multi-Stage Test Vehicles in the Development of the Dresser-Rand DATUM Compressor
,”
Dresser-Rand Technol. J.
,
2
, pp.
133
–
147
.
2.
Sorokes, J. M., and Welch, J. P., 1991, “Centrifugal Compressor Performance Enhancement Through the Use of Single-Stage Development Rig,” Proceedings of the 20th Turbomachinery Symposium, Texas A&M, pp. 101–112.
3.
Sorokes, J. M., and Welch, J. P., 1992, “Experimental Results on a Rotatable Low Solidity Vaned Diffuser,” ASME paper no. 92-GT-19.
4.
Benvenuti, E., 1978, “Aerodynamic Development of Stages for Industrial Centrifugal Compressors. Part 1: Testing Requirements and Equipment—Immediate Experimental Evidence,” ASME paper no. 78-GT-4.
5.
Kotliar, M., Engstrom, R., and Giachi, M., 1999, “The Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics and Scale Model Component Testing for a Large FCC Prototype Air Compressor,” Proceedings of the 28th Turbomachinery Symposium, Texas A&M, pp. 69–76.
6.
Borer, C., Sorokes, J. M., McMahon, T., and Abraham, E., 1997, “An Assessment of the Forces Acting Upon a Centrifugal Impeller Using Full Load, Full Pressure Hydrocarbon Testing,” Proceedings of the 26th Turbomachinery Symposium, Texas A&M, pp. 111–121.
7.
ASME, 1997, “PTC 10, Performance Test Code on Compressors and Exhausters,” ASME Press.
8.
Dieter, W., 2002, “An Optimized Pneumatic Probe for Investigation of Gas Turbine Aerodynamics in Full Scale Gas Turbines,” ASME paper no. GT-2002-30044.
9.
Smout
,
P. D.
, and
Ivey
,
P. C.
,
1997
, “
Investigation of Wedge Probe Wall Proximity Effects: Part 1—Experimental Study
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
119
, pp.
598
–
604
.
10.
Roduner, C., Ko¨ppel, Kupferschmied, P., and Gyarmathy, G., 1998, “Comparison of Measurement Data at the Impeller Exit of a Centrifugal Compressor Measured With Both Pneumatic and Fast-Response Probes,” ASME paper no. 98-GT-241.
11.
Johansen
,
E. S.
,
Rediniotis
,
O. K.
, and
Jones
,
G.
,
2001
, “
The Compressible Calibration of Miniature Multi-Hole Probes
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
123
, pp.
128
–
138
.
12.
Johansen, E. S., 2001, “Development of a Fast-Response Multi-Hole Probe for Unsteady and Turbulent Flowfields,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
13.
Dominy
,
R. G.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
1993
, “
An Investigation of Factors Influencing the Calibration of Five-Hole Probes for Three-Dimensional Flow Measurements
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
513
–
519
.
14.
Zeiger, M. D., Chalmeta, L. P., and Telionis, D. P., 1998, “Tip Geometry Effects on Calibration and Performance of Seven Hole Probes,” AIAA paper no. AIAA-98-2810.
15.
Lee, S. W., and Jun, S. B., 2003, “Effects of Reynolds Number on the Non-Nulling Calibration of a Cone-Type Five-Hole Probe,” ASME paper no. GT-2003-38147.
16.
Johansen, E. S., 1998, “Steady and Unsteady Calibration of Multi-Hole Probes,” M.S. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
17.
Brand, L., 1957, Vector Analysis, Wiley, New York, pp. 17–19.
18.
Spiegel, M., 1959, Vector Analysis, and an Introduction to Tensor Analysis, Schaum’s Outline Series, McGraw Hill, New York, pp. 58–59, 76.
19.
Johansen, E. S., and Rediniotis, O. K., 2002, “Development of Unsteady Calibration Facilities and Techniques for Fast-Response Pressure Probes,” AIAA paper no. AIAA-2002-0689.
20.
Gossweiller
,
C. R.
,
Kupferschmied
,
P.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
,
1995
, “
On Fast-Response Probes: Part 1—Technology, Calibration, and Application to Turbomachinery
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
117
, pp.
611
–
617
.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.