Typically several hundred million data points arise from a comprehensive measurement campaign carried out in a centrifugal compressor test rig with the fast-response aerodynamic probe system (see Part 1). In order to obtain a maximum of information about the unsteady flow at any position in this turbomachine, the time-resolved data processing method has to be optimized. In contrast to the standard time-averaged flow measurements with pneumatic probes, the objective of fast-response aerodynamic probe measurements and of data processing is to extract novel information about crucial unsteady phenomena like turbulence, row-to-row interaction, modal or rotating stall, leakage flow effects, etc. In such cases, the simultaneous measurement of static and total pressures and flow vectors is of particular interest. Novel information means the analysis of averaged and time-resolved (wavelet) spectra, autocorrelations or time averages properly conserving physical fluxes, etc. Different averaging methods are applied to compress the time-dependent data measured by a one-sensor-probe (see Part 2) in a centrifugal compressor. Such results could be used for comparison with pneumatic sensor measurements and CFD calculations. The comparison of averaging methods includes the averaging theories by Traupel and by Dzung, which are compared to simple arithmetic time averaging. From there the specific stage work is calculated. In analyzing the time dependency, several ensemble-averaging procedures for flow pressure and velocity are utilized for separating deterministic from stochastic fluctuations, extracting blade row finger prints or investigating low-frequency surge type fluctuations. With respect to the selection and overall optimization of data processing methods, an overview of generic tools is given and the modularity of the processing procedures is discussed. [S0889-504X(00)01203-4]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2000
Technical Papers
On the Development and Application of the Fast-Response Aerodynamic Probe System in Turbomachines—Part 3: Comparison of Averaging Methods Applied to Centrifugal Compressor Measurements
Pascal Ko¨ppel,
Pascal Ko¨ppel
Turbomachinery Laboratory, Institute of Energy Technology, ETH—Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Christian Roduner,
Christian Roduner
Turbomachinery Laboratory, Institute of Energy Technology, ETH—Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter Kupferschmied,
Peter Kupferschmied
Turbomachinery Laboratory, Institute of Energy Technology, ETH—Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Georg Gyarmathy
Georg Gyarmathy
Turbomachinery Laboratory, Institute of Energy Technology, ETH—Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
Pascal Ko¨ppel
Turbomachinery Laboratory, Institute of Energy Technology, ETH—Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Christian Roduner
Turbomachinery Laboratory, Institute of Energy Technology, ETH—Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Peter Kupferschmied
Turbomachinery Laboratory, Institute of Energy Technology, ETH—Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Georg Gyarmathy
Turbomachinery Laboratory, Institute of Energy Technology, ETH—Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute and presented at the 44th International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Indianapolis, Indiana, June 7–10, 1999. Manuscript received by the International Gas Turbine Institute February 1999. Paper No. 99-GT-154. Review Chair: D. C. Wisler.
J. Turbomach. Jul 2000, 122(3): 527-535 (9 pages)
Published Online: February 1, 1999
Article history
Received:
February 1, 1999
Citation
Ko¨ppel , P., Roduner , C., Kupferschmied , P., and Gyarmathy, G. (February 1, 1999). "On the Development and Application of the Fast-Response Aerodynamic Probe System in Turbomachines—Part 3: Comparison of Averaging Methods Applied to Centrifugal Compressor Measurements ." ASME. J. Turbomach. July 2000; 122(3): 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1303820
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
On the Development and Application of the Fast-Response Aerodynamic Probe System in Turbomachines—Part 2: Flow, Surge, and Stall in a Centrifugal Compressor
J. Turbomach (July,2000)
Experimental Analysis of a Waveguide Pressure Measuring System
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Control and Operational Performance
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential
Alternative Systems
Turbo/Supercharger Compressors and Turbines for Aircraft Propulsion in WWII: Theory, History and Practice—Guidance from the Past for Modern Engineers and Students
Performance Testing of Combined Cycle Power Plant
Handbook for Cogeneration and Combined Cycle Power Plants, Second Edition