A new family of subsonic compressor airfoils, which are characterized by low losses and wide operating ranges, has been designed for use in heavy-duty gas turbines. In particular the influence of the higher airfoil Reynolds numbers compared to aeroengine compressors and the impact of these differences on the location of transition are taken into account. The design process itself is carried out by the combination of a geometric code for the airfoil description, with a blade-to-blade solver and a numerical optimization algorithm. The optimization process includes the design-point losses for a specified Q3D flow problem and the off-design performance for the entire operating range. The family covers a wide range of inlet flow angle, Mach number, flow turning, blade thickness, solidity and AVDR in order to consider the entire range of flow conditions that occur in practical compressor design. The superior performance of the new airfoil family is demonstrated by a comparison with conventional controlled diffusion airfoils (CDA). The advantage in performance has been confirmed by detailed experimental investigations, which will be presented in Part II of the paper. This leads to the conclusion that CDA airfoils that have been primarily developed for aeroengine applications are not the optimum solution, if directly transferred to heavy-duty gas turbines. A significant improvement in compressor efficiency is possible, if the new profiles are used instead of conventional airfoils. [S0889-504X(00)02102-4]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
gas turbines, aircraft, optimisation, compressors, subsonic flow, aerodynamics, geometric codes
Topics:
Airfoils, Compressors, Design, Optimization, Gas turbines, Flow (Dynamics), Mach number
1.
Johnsen, I., and Bullock, R., 1965, “Aerodynamical Design of Axial-Flow Compressors,” NASA SP-36.
2.
Hobbs
,
D.
, and
Weingold
,
H.
,
1984
, “
Development of Controlled Diffusion Airfoils for Multistage Compressor Application
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
106
, pp.
271
–
278
.
3.
Korn, D., 1975, “Numerical Design of Transonic Cascades,” ERDA Research and Development Report C00-3077-72.
4.
Schmidt, E., 1979, “Computation of Supercritical Compressor and Turbine Cascades With a Design Method for Transonic Flows,” ASME Paper No. 79-GT-30.
5.
Stephens
,
H.
,
1979
, “
Application of Supercritical Airfoil Technology to Two-Dimensional Compressor Cascades: Comparison of Theoretical and Experimental Results
,”
AIAA J.
,
17
, No.
6
, pp.
594
–
600
.
6.
Rechter
,
H.
,
Steinert
,
W.
, and
Lehmann
,
K.
,
1985
, “
Comparison of Controlled Diffusion Airfoils With Conventional NACA 65 Airfoils Developed for Stator Blade Application in a Multistage Axial Compressor
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
, pp.
494
–
498
.
7.
Dunker
,
R.
,
Rechter
,
H.
,
Starken
,
H.
, and
Weyer
,
H. B.
,
1984
, “
Redesign and Performance Analysis of a Transonic Axial Compressor Stator and Equivalent Plane Cascades With Subsonic Controlled Diffusion Blades
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
106
, pp.
279
–
287
.
8.
Sanger
,
N. L.
,
1983
, “
The Use of Optimization Techniques to Design Controlled Diffusion Compressor Blading
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
105
, pp.
256
–
265
.
9.
Sanz
,
J.
,
1988
, “
Automated Design of Controlled Diffusion Blades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
110
, pp.
540
–
544
.
10.
Goel, S., Cofer, J., and Hardev, S., 1996, “Turbine Airfoil Design Optimization,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-158.
11.
Pierret, S., Van den Braembussche, R., 1997, “Turbomachinery Blade Design Using a Navier–Stokes Solver and Artifical Neural Network,” Reprint from 4th National Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, May 22–23, Leuven, Belgium.
12.
Lawerenz, M., 1995, “Aerodynamische Optimierung von Stro¨mungsmaschinen unter Verwendung direkter numerischer Optimierungsverfahreh,” Abschlußbericht TURBOTECH-Verbundvorhaben 1.1.2.13.
13.
Schwarz, R., and Spiegel, M., 1995, “Direkte Optimierungsverfahren zur Lo¨sung aerodynamischer Problemstellungen bei Turbomaschinen,” Abschlußbericht TURBOTECH-Verbundvorhaben 1.1.2.14.
14.
Ku¨sters
,
B.
,
Schreiber
,
H. A.
,
Ko¨ller
,
U.
, and
Mo¨nig
,
R.
,
1999
, “
Development of Advanced Compressor Airfoils for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines: Part II—Experimental and Theoretical Analysis
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
, this issue, pp.
406
–
415
.
15.
Becker, B., Schulenberg, T., and Termuehlen, H., 1995, “The 3A-Series Gas Turbines With HBR Combustors,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-458.
16.
Steinert
,
W.
,
Eisenberg
,
B.
, and
Starken
,
H.
,
1991
, “
Design and Testing of a Controlled Diffusion Airfoil Cascade for Industrial Axial Flow Compressor Application
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
583
–
590
.
17.
Giles, M., 1985, “Newton Solution of Steady Two-Dimensional Transonic Flow,” GTL Report No. 186, Oct.
18.
Drela, M., 1986, “Two-Dimensional Transonic Aerodynamic Design and Analysis Using the Euler and Boundary Layer Equations,” GTL Report No. 187, Feb.
19.
Drela, M., 1995, “MISES Implementation of Modified Abu-Ghannam Shaw Transition Criterion,” MISES User’s Guide, MIT.
20.
Pieper, S., and Schulte, J., 1995, “Verlustarme Verdichterauslegung (Experiment I und II),” FVV Forschungsbericht 581.
21.
Schulenberg, T., and Zimmermann, H., 1995, “New Blade Design of Siemens Gas Turbines,” POWER-GEN Europe, May 16–18, Amsterdam.
22.
Mayle
,
E.
,
1991
, “
The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
509
–
537
.
23.
Halstead
,
D. E.
,
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
Okiishi
,
T. H.
,
Walker
,
G. J.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Shin
,
H.-W.
,
1997
, “
Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines: Part 1–4
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
114
–
127
, 426–444, 225–237, 128–139.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.