An unsteady, compressible, two-dimensional, thin shear layer Navier–Stokes solver is modified to predict the motion-dependent unsteady flow around oscillating airfoils in a cascade. A quasi-three-dimensional formulations is used to account for the stream-wise variation of streamtube height. The code uses Ni’s Lax–Wendroff algorithm in the outer region, an implicit ADI method in the inner region, conservative coupling at the interface, and the Baldwin–Lomax turbulence model. The computational mesh consists of an O-grid around each blade plus an unstructured outer grid of quadrilateral or triangular cells. The unstructured computational grid was adapted to the flow to better resolve shocks and wakes. Motion of each airfoil was simulated at each time step by stretching and compressing the mesh within the O-grid. This imposed motion consists of harmonic solid body translation in two directions and rotation, combined with the correct interblade phase angles. The validity of the code is illustrated by comparing its predictions to a number of test cases, including an axially oscillating flat plate in laminar flow, the Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines Symposium Fourth Standard Configuration (a transonic turbine cascade), and the Seventh Standard Configuration (a transonic compressor cascade). The overall comparison between the predictions and the test data is reasonably good. A numerical study on a generic transonic compressor rotor was performed in which the impact of varying the amplitude of the airfoil oscillation on the normalized predicted magnitude and phase of the unsteady pressure around the airfoil was studied. It was observed that for this transonic compressor, the nondimensional aerodynamic damping was influenced by the amplitude of the oscillation.

1.
Abhari
R. S.
,
Guenette
G. R.
,
Epstein
A. H.
, and
Giles
M. B.
,
1992
, “
Comparison of Time-Resolved Turbine Rotor Blade Heat Transfer Measurements and Numerical Calculations
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
114
, pp.
818
827
.
2.
Baldwin, B. S., and Lomax, H., 1978, “Thin Layer Approximation and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulent Flows,” AIAA Paper No. 78-257.
3.
Bo¨lcs, A., and Fransson, T. H., eds., 1986, “Aeroelasticity in Turbomachines, Comparison of Theoretical and Experimental Cascade Results,” Communication de Laboratoire de Thermique Appliquee et de Turbomachines, No. 16, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
4.
Erdos, J. I., and Alzner, E., 1978, “Computation of Unsteady Transonic Flows Through Rotating and Stationary Cascades,” NASA CR-2900.
5.
Giles, M. B., 1988, “UNSFLO: A Numerical Method for Unsteady Inviscid Flow in Turbomachinery,” MIT Gas Turbine Laboratory Report No. 195.
6.
Giles, M. B., 1991, “UNSFLO: A Numerical Method for the Calculation of Unsteady Flow in Turbomachinery,” MIT Gas Turbine Laboratory Report No.
7.
Giles
M. B.
, and
Haimes
R.
,
1993
, “
Validation of a Numerical Method for Unsteady Flow Calculations
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
115
, pp.
110
117
.
8.
He
L.
,
1990
, “
An Euler Solution for Unsteady Flows Around Oscillating Blades
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
112
, pp.
714
722
.
9.
Moore, F. K., 1951, “Unsteady Laminar Boundary Layer Flow,” NACA TN 2471.
10.
Ni
R.-H.
,
1981
, “
A Multiple Grid Scheme for Solving the Euler Equations
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
20
, No.
11
, pp.
1565
1571
.
11.
Rao, J. S., 1991, Turbomachine Blade Vibration, Wiley, New York.
12.
Verdon, J. M., and Casper, J. R., 1982, “Development of a Linear Unsteady Aerodynamics for Finite Deflection Cascades,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 20, No. 9.
13.
Whitehead, D. S., 1982, “The Calculations of Steady and Unsteady Transonic Flow in Cascades,” Cambridge University Engineering Dept., Report CUED/A-Turbo/TR118.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.