The readers ought to be aware of some claims based on unfounded theories in the subject paper [1], which could possibly distort results and hinder future research and development. To start, Eq. (3) in the subject paper is stated to be taken from Ref. [70] (Johnson’s classical textbook). However, said Eq. (3) is imprecise because it uses a constant coefficient θy = 1.1, as claimed. That coefficient does not account for the variability in compressibility of the materials in contact, i.e., the Poisson’s ratios of the materials. The general range of Poisson’s ratios, ν, for crystalline and engineering materials is between -1 and 0.5. For example, ν = 0.2 for cast iron, ν = 0.18 for glass, or ν = 0.44 for gold. There are many materials and crystallines that have negative Poisson ratios (some are even time-dependent). Thus, limiting analyses and discussions to narrow subsets...

You do not currently have access to this content.