When contact problems are solved by numerical approaches, a surface profile is usually described by a series of discrete nodes with the same intervals along a coordinate axis. Contact computation based on roughness datum mesh may be time consuming. An adaptive-surface elasto-plastic asperity contact model is presented in this paper. Such a model is developed in order to reduce the computing time by removing the surface nodes that have little influence on the contact behavior of rough surfaces. The nodes to be removed are determined by a prescribed threshold. The adaptive-surface asperity contact model is solved by means of the element-free Galerkin-finite element coupling method because of its flexibility in domain discretization and versatility in node arrangements. The effects of different thresholds on contact pressure distribution, real contact area, and elasto-plastic stress fields in contacting bodies are investigated and discussed. The results show that this model can help reduce about 48% computational time when the relative errors are about 5%.

1.
Myshkin
,
N. K.
,
Petrokovets
,
M. I.
, and
Chizhik
,
S. A.
, 1998, “
Simulation of Real Contact in Tribology
,”
Tribol. Int.
0301-679X
31
, pp.
79
85
.
2.
Trumpold
,
H.
, and
Heldt
,
E.
, 1998, “
Why Filtering Surface Profiles
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955
38
(
5-6
), pp.
639
646
.
3.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Williamson
,
J. B. P.
, 1966, “
The Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
1364-5021,
295
, pp.
300
319
.
4.
Patir
,
N.
, 1978, “
A Numerical Procedure for Random Generation of Rough Surfaces
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
47
, pp.
263
277
.
5.
Hu
,
Y. Z.
, and
Tonder
,
K.
, 1992, “
Simulation of 3-D Random Surface by 2-D Digital Filter and Fourier Analysis
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955
32
(
1-2
), pp.
83
90
.
6.
Borri-Brunetto
,
M.
,
Carpinteri
,
A.
, and
Chiaia
,
B.
, 1998, “
Lacunarity of the Contact Domain Between Elastic Bodies With Rough Boundaries
,”
Probamat-21st Century: Probabilities and Materials
,
G.
Frantziskonis
, ed.,
Kluwer
, Dordrecht, pp.
45
64
.
7.
Ciavarella
,
M.
, and
Demelio
,
G.
, 2001, “
Elastic Multiscale Contact of Rough Surfaces: Archard’s Model Revisited and Comparisons With Modern Fractal Models
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
68
, pp.
496
498
.
8.
Liu
,
G.
,
Zhu
,
J.
,
Yu
,
L.
, and
Wang
,
Q.
, 2001, “
Elasto-Plastic Contact of Rough Surfaces
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
1040-2004,
44
, pp.
437
443
.
9.
Polonsky
,
I. A.
, and
Keer
,
L. M.
, 1999, “
Numerical Method for Solving Rough Contact Problems Based on the Multi-level Multi-summation and Conjugate Gradient Techniques
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
231
(
2
), pp.
206
219
.
10.
Stanley
,
H. M.
, and
Kato
,
T.
, 1997, “
FFT-Based Method for Rough Surface Contact
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
119
(
3
), pp.
481
485
.
11.
Tian
,
X.
, and
Bhushan
,
B.
, 1996, “
A Numerical Three-Dimensional Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces by Variational Principle
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
118
, pp.
33
42
.
12.
Piegl
,
Les. A.
, and
Tiller
,
W.
, 2000, “
Reducing Control Points in Surface Interpolation
,”
IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl.
0272-1716,
20
(
5
), pp.
70
74
.
13.
Liu
,
T.
,
Liu
,
G.
, and
Wang
,
Q.
, 2006, “
An Element-Free Galerkin-Finite Element Coupling Method for Elasto-Plastic Contact Problems
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
128
(
1
), pp.
1
9
.
14.
Belytschko
,
T.
,
Organ
,
D.
, and
Krongauz
,
Y.
, 1995, “
A Coupled Finite Element-Element-Free Galerkin Method
,”
Comput. Mech.
0178-7675,
17
, pp.
186
195
.
You do not currently have access to this content.