An experimental and numerical study of the scratch test on polymers near their surface is presented. The elastoplastic response of three polymers is compared during scratch tests at large deformations: polycarbonate, a thermosetting polymer and a sol-gel hard coating composed of a hybrid matrix (thermosetting polymer-mineral) reinforced with oxide nanoparticles. The experiments were performed using a nanoindenter with a conical diamond tip having an included angle of 30 deg and a spherical radius of 600 nm. The observations obtained revealed that thermosetting polymers have a larger elastic recovery and a higher hardness than polycarbonate. The origin of this difference in scratch resistance was investigated with numerical modelling of the scratch test in three dimensions. Starting from results obtained by Bucaille (J. Mat. Sci., 37, pp. 3999–4011, 2002) using an inverse analysis of the indentation test, the mechanical behavior of polymers is modeled with Young’s modulus for the elastic part and with the G’sell-Jonas’ law with an exponential strain hardening for the viscoplastic part. The strain hardening coefficient is the main characteristic parameter differentiating the three studied polymers. Its value is equal to 0.5, 4.5, and 35, for polycarbonate, the thermosetting polymer and the reinforced thermosetting polymer, respectively. Firstly, simulations reveals that plastic strains are higher in scratch tests than in indentation tests, and that the magnitude of the plastic strains decreases as the strain hardening increases. For scratching on polycarbonate and for a penetration depth of 0.5 μm of the indenter mentioned above, the representative strain is equal to 124%. Secondly, in agreement with experimental results, numerical modeling shows that an increase in the strain hardening coefficient reduces the penetration depth of the indenter into the material and decreases the depth of the residual groove, which means an improvement in the scratch resistance.

1.
Adams
,
M. J.
,
Allan
,
A.
,
Briscoe
,
B. J.
,
Doyle
,
P. J.
,
Gorman
,
D. M.
, and
Johnson
,
S. A.
,
2001
, “
An Experimental Study of the Nano-Scratch Behavior of Poly(methyl methacrylate)
,”
Wear
,
251
, pp.
1579
1583
.
2.
Briscoe
,
B. J.
,
Evans
,
P. D.
,
Pelillo
,
E.
, and
Sinha
,
S. K.
,
1996
, “
Scratching Maps for Polymers
,”
Wear
,
200
, pp.
137
147
.
3.
Stuart
,
B. H.
, and
Briscoe
,
B. J.
,
1996
, “
Scratch Hardness Studies of Pol(ether ether ketone)
,”
Polymer
,
37
(
17
), pp.
3819
3824
.
4.
Bertrand Lambotte
,
P.
,
2001
, “
Nano-Indentation, Scratching and Atomic Force Microscopy for Evaluating the Mar Resistance of Automotive Clearcoats: Study of the Ductile Scratches
,”
Thin Solid Films
,
306-312
, pp.
398
399
.
5.
Lu
,
W.
, and
Komvopoulos
,
K.
,
2001
, “
Nanomechanical and Nanotribological Properties of Carbon, Chromium, and Titanium Carbide Ultrathin Films
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
123
, pp.
717
724
.
6.
Johnson
,
K. L.
,
1970
, “
The Correlation of Indentation Experiments
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
18
, pp.
115
126
.
7.
Bucaille
,
J. L.
, and
Felder
,
E.
,
2002
, “
Finite Element Analysis of Deformation During Indentation and Scratch Tests on Elastic Perfectly-Plastic Materials
,”
Philos. Mag. A
,
82
(
10
), pp.
2003
2012
.
8.
Chaudhri
,
M. M.
,
1998
, “
Subsurface Strain Distribution Around Vickers Hardness Indentations in Annealed Polycrystalline Copper
,”
Acta Mater.
,
46
(
9
), pp.
3047
3056
.
9.
Briscoe, B. J., Pelillo, E., Ragazzi, F., and Sinha, S. K., 1998, “Scratch Deformation of Methanol Plastized Poly(methylmethacrylate) Surfaces,” Polymer, 39(11), pp. 2161–2168.
10.
Gauthier
,
C.
,
Lafaye
,
S.
, and
Schirrer
,
R.
,
2001
, “
Elastic Recovery of a Scratch in a Polymeric Surface: Experiments and Analysis
,”
Tribol. Int.
,
34
, pp.
469
479
.
11.
Bucaille
,
J. L.
,
Felder
,
E.
, and
Hochstetter
,
G.
,
2001
, “
Mechanical Analysis of the Scratch Test on Elastic Perfectly-Plastic Materials With the Three Dimensional Finite Element Modeling
,”
Wear
,
249
(
5–6
), pp.
422
432
.
12.
Tangena, A. G., Franklin, S., and Franse, J., 1989, “Scratch Tests on Hard Layers,” in Mechanics of Coatings, D. Dowson, C. M. Taylor, and M. Godet, eds., pp. 169–174.
13.
Kral
,
E. R.
, and
Komvopoulos
,
K.
,
1997
, “
Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Subsurface Stress and Strain Fields Due to Sliding Contact on an Elastic-Plastic Layered Medium
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
119
, pp.
332
341
.
14.
Suhbash
,
G.
, and
Zhang
,
W.
,
2002
, “
Investigation of the Overall Friction Coefficient in Single-Pass Scratch Test
,”
Wear
,
252
, pp.
123
134
.
15.
Bucaille
,
J. L.
,
Felder
,
E.
, and
Hochstetter
,
G.
,
2002
, “
Identification of the Viscoplastic Behavior of a Polycarbonate Based on Experiments and Numerical Modeling of the Nanoindentation Test
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
,
37
, pp.
3999
4011
.
16.
Bucaille, J. L., 2001, “Simulation Nume´rique de l’Indentation et de la Rayure des Verres Organiques,” Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Supe´rieure des Mines de Paris.
17.
Hochstetter
,
G.
,
Jimenez
,
A.
, and
Loubet
,
J.-L.
,
1999
, “
Strain Rate Effects on Hardness of Glassy Polymers in the Nanoscale Range. Comparison Between Quasi-Static and Continuous Stiffness Measurements
,”
J. Macromol. Sci., Phys.
,
B38
(
5–6
), pp.
681
692
.
18.
G’Sell, C., 1995, Introduction a` la Me´canique des Polyme`res, Chapter Lois de Comportement Me´canique des Polyme`res Solides, C. G’Sell and J. M. Haudin, eds., Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, pp. 141–168.
19.
Bisilliat, M. L., 1997, “Comportement me´canique d’un polycarbonate a` grande vitesse de sollicitation. Etude expe´rimentale et simulation,” Ph.D thesis, Ecole Nationale Supe´rieure des Mines de Paris.
20.
Goddard
,
J.
, and
Wilman
,
H.
,
1962
, “
A Theory of Friction and Wear During the Abrasion of Metals
,”
Wear
,
5
, pp.
114
135
.
21.
Tabor, D., 1951, The Hardness of Metals, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
You do not currently have access to this content.