A previous study of the behavior of friction in EHL contacts for the case of Eyring lubricant behavior resulted in a friction mastercurve. In this paper the same approach is applied to the case of limiting shear stress behavior. By means of numerical simulations the friction coefficient has been computed for a wide range of operating conditions and contact geometries. It is shown that the same two parameters that were found in the Eyring study, a characteristic shear stress, and a reduced coefficient of friction, also govern the behavior of the friction for the case of limiting shear stress models. When the calculated traction data is plotted as a function of these two parameters all results for different cases lie close to a single curve. Experimentally measured traction data is used to validate the observed behavior. Finally, the equations of the mastercurves for both types of rheological model are compared resulting in a relation between the Eyring stress τ0 and the limiting shear stress τL.

1.
Ehret
,
P.
,
Dowson
,
D.
, and
Taylor
,
C. M.
,
1998
, “
On Lubricant Transport Conditions in Elastohydrodynamic Conjunctions
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
454
, pp.
763
787
.
2.
Kudish, I. I., 1981, “On Solution of some Contact and Elastohydrodynamic Problems,” Warsawa, 3rd International Tribology Congress EUROTRIB 81.
3.
Jacod
,
B.
,
Venner
,
C. H.
, and
Lugt
,
P. M.
,
2001
, “
A Generalized Traction Curve for EHL Contacts
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
123
, pp.
248
253
.
4.
Elsharkawy
,
A. A.
, and
Hamrock
,
B. J.
,
1991
, “
Subsurface Stresses in Micro-EHL Line Contacts
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
113
, pp.
645
657
.
5.
Lee
,
R.-T.
, and
Hamrock
,
B. J.
,
1990
, “
A Circular Non-Newtonian Model: Part 1- Used in Elasto-hydrodynamic Lubrication
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
112
, pp.
386
496
.
6.
Bair
,
S.
, and
Winer
,
W. O.
,
1979
, “
A Rheological Model for Elastohydrodynamic Contacts Based in Primary Laboratory Data
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
101
, pp.
258
265
.
7.
Iivonen
,
H.
, and
Hamrock
,
B. J.
,
1991
, “
A new non-Newtonian fluid model for elastohydrodynamic lubrication of rectangular contacts
,”
Wear
,
143
, pp.
297
305
.
8.
Gecim
,
B.
, and
Winer
,
W. O.
,
1981
, “
Lubricant Limiting Shear Stress Effect on EHD Film Thickness
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
102
, pp.
213
221
.
9.
Conry
,
T. F.
,
Wang
,
S.
, and
Cusano
,
C.
,
1987
, “
A Reynolds-Eyring Equation for Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication in Line Contacts
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
109
, pp.
648
658
.
10.
Sharif, K. J., Morris, S. J., Evans, H. P., and Snidle, R. W., “Comparison of non-Newtonian EHL models in high sliding applications,” Proc. 27th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, pp. 787–796, ed., D. Dowson, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
11.
Dowson, D., and Higginson, G. R., 1966, Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication, The Fundamentals of Roller and Gear Lubrication, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
12.
Roelands, C., 1966, “Correlational Aspects of the Viscosity-Temperature-Pressure Relationship of Lubrication Oils,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Hogeschool Delft, The Netherlands.
13.
Yasutomi
,
S.
,
Bair
,
S.
, and
Winer
,
W. O.
,
1984
, “
An Application of Free Volume Model To Lubricant Rheology
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
106
, pp.
291
303
.
14.
Venner, C. H., and Lubrecht, A. A., 2000, Multilevel Methods in Lubrication, Tribology Series, 37, ed., D. Dowson, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
15.
Bair
,
S.
,
2000
, “
Pressure-Viscosity Behavior of Lubricants to 1.4 GPa and Its Relation to EHD Traction
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
43
, pp.
91
99
.
16.
Evans
,
C. R.
, and
Johnson
,
K. L.
,
1986
, “
Rheological Properties of EHD Lubricants
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
200
, pp.
303
312
.
17.
Moore, A. J., 1981, “The Derivation of basic liquid flow properties from disc machine traction tests,” Proc. 7th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, pp. 289–295, ed., D. Dowson, Westbury House, Guilford, UK.
18.
Bair, S., and Winer, W. O., 2000, “The Pressure-Viscosity Coefficient at Hertzian Pressure and Its Relation to Concentrated Contact Traction,” Proc. 26th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, pp. 433–443, ed., D. Dowson, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
19.
Bair
,
S.
, and
Winer
,
W. O.
,
1982
, “
Some Observations in High Pressure Rheology of Lubricants
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
104
, pp.
357
364
.
20.
Hoglund
,
E.
, and
Jacobson
,
B.
,
1986
, “
Experimental Investigation of the Shear Strength of Lubricants Subjected to High Pressure and Temperature
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
108
, pp.
571
578
.
21.
Bair, S., 2001, “Ordinary shear thinning Behavior in liquids and its effect upon EHD Traction,” Proc. 27th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, pp. 733–742, ed., D. Dowson, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
22.
Ehret, P., Chevalier, F., Dowson, D., Taylor, C. M., Okamura, H., and Sano, T., 2000, “Traction in EHL elliptical contacts with spin conditions,” Proc. 26Th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, pp. 71–84, ed., D. Dowson, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
23.
Venner, C. H., and Lubrecht, A. A., 1999, “Amplitude Reduction of Non-Isotropic Harmonic Patterns in Circular EHL Contacts, under Pure Rolling,” Proc. 25th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, pp. 151–162, ed., D. Dowson, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
You do not currently have access to this content.