This paper describes a combined theoretical and experimental investigation of the eight oil film stiffness and damping coefficients for a novel low impedance hydrodynamic bearing. The novel design incorporates a recess in the bearing surface which is connected to a standard commercial gas bag accumulator; this arrangement reduces the oil film dynamic stiffness and leads to improved machine response and stability. A finite difference method was used to solve Reynolds equation and yield the pressure distribution in the bearing oil film. Integration of the pressure profile then enabled the fluid film forces to be evaluated. A perturbation technique was used to determine the dynamic pressure components, and hence to determine the eight oil film stiffness and damping coefficients. Experimental data was obtained from a laboratory test rig in which a test bearing, floating on a rotating shaft, was excited by a multi-frequency force signal. Measurements of the resulting relative movement between bearing and journal enabled the oil film coefficients to be measured. The results of the work show good agreement between theoretical and experimental data, and indicate that the oil film impedance of the novel design is considerably lower than that of a conventional bearing.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Bearings, Damping, Stiffness, Pressure, Design, Finite difference methods, Fluid films, Machinery, Secondary cells, Signals, Stability
1.
Althaus, J., and Ulbrich, H., 1992, “A Fast Hydraulic Actuator for Active Vibration Control,” Proc. IMechE Int. Conf. Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, Univ. Bath, Sept., pp. 141–148.
2.
Burrows, C. R., and Stanway, R., 1977, “Identification of Journal Bearing Characteristics,” Proc. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Sept., pp. 167–173.
3.
Fang, Y., 1994, “Calculation and Measurement of the Eight Oil Film Stiffness and Damping Coefficients for a Variable Impedance Hydrodynamic Bearing,” PhD thesis, Staffordshire Univ., May.
4.
Goodwin, M. J., 1989, Dynamics of Rotor-Bearing Systems, Unwin-Hyman Ltd, London.
5.
Goodwin, M. J., Boroomand, T., and Hooke, C. J., 1990, “Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of a Variable Impedance Hydrodynamic Bearing,” Tribology International, Vol. 23, 6, Dec.
6.
Goodwin, M. J., Boroomand, T., and Hooke, C. J., 1991, “Experimental Tests on a New Hydrodynamic Bearing for Low Machine Vibration,” Trans. IMechE Conf. Machine Systems, Int. Conv. Centre, Birmingham, April, paper C414/014, pp. 173–179.
7.
Larsonneur, R., Siegwart, R., and Traxler, A., 1992, “Active Magnetic Bearing Control Strategies for Solving Vibration Problems in Industrial Rotor Systems,” Proc. IMechE Int. Conf. Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, Univ. Bath, Sept., pp. 83–90.
8.
Lim, L. K., 1994, “Stability of a Variable Dynamic Stiffness Bearing,” PhD thesis, Staffordshire University, June.
9.
Lund
J. W.
,
1987
, “
Review of the Concept of Dynamic Stiffness Coefficients for Fluid Film Journal Bearings
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
109
, pp.
37
–
41
.
10.
Pugnet, J. M., and Vinsonneau, B., 1992, “Modelling of a Turbo-Machine for Complex Eigenfrequency Calculations and Dynamic Response Prediction-Application to Vibration Control of a Turbo-Generator,” Proc. IMechE Int. Conf. Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, Univ. Bath, Sept., pp. 549–556.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1997
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.