The effects of wind shear and turbulence on rotor fatigue and loads control are explored for a large horizontal axis wind turbine in variable speed operation at wind speeds from 4 to 20 m/s. Two- and three-blade rigid rotors are considered over a range of wind shear exponents up to 1.25 and a range of turbulence intensities up to 17%. RMS blade root flatwise moments are predicted to be very substantially increased at higher wind shear, and resultant fatigue damage is increased by many orders of magnitude. Smaller but similar trends occur with increasing turbulence levels. In-plane fatigue damage is driven by 1P gravity loads and exacerbated by turbulence level at higher wind speeds. This damage is higher by one to two orders of magnitude at the roots of the three-blade rotor compared with the two-blade rotor. Individual blade pitch control of fluctuating flatwise moments markedly reduces flatwise fatigue damage due to this source, and, to a lesser degree, the in-plane damage due to turbulence. The same is true of fluctuating rotor torque moments driven by turbulence and transmitted to the drive train. Blade root moments out of the plane of rotation aggregate to create rotor pitching and yawing moments transmitted to the turbine structure through the drive train to the yaw drive system and the tower. These moments are predicted to be relatively insensitive to turbulence level and essentially proportional to the wind shear exponent for the two-blade rotor. Fluctuating moments are substantially reduced with individual blade pitch control, and addition of a teeter degree-of-freedom should further contribute to this end. Fluctuating pitching and yawing moments of the three-blade rotor are substantially less sensitive to wind shear, more sensitive to turbulence level, and substantially lower than those for the two-blade rotor. Mean rotor torque and, hence, power are essentially the same for both rotors, independent of wind shear, and are somewhat reduced with individual blade pitch control of fluctuating flatwise moments. The same is true of mean rotor thrust; however fluctuations in rotor thrust are substantially reduced with individual blade pitch control.

1.
Moriarty, P.J., Eggers, A.J., Jr., Chaney, K., and Holley, W.E., 2001 “Scale and Lag Effects on Control of Aerodynamic Power and Loads on a HAWT Rotor,” A Collection of the 2001 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Technical Papers Presented at the 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.
2.
Eggers, A.J., Jr., Moriarty, P., Chaney, K., Digumarthi, R., and Holley, W.E., 2002 “Influence of Transition Modes and Gravity Loads on Rotor Fatigue and Power Control,” A Collection of the 2002 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Technical Papers Presented at the 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.
3.
Iowa/Nebraska Distributed Wind Generation Projects First and Second-Year Operating Experience: 1999–2001. U.S. Department of Energy–EPRI Wind Turbine Verification Program. 1004039. Final Report, December 2001.
4.
Wisconsin Low Wind Speed Turbine Project Third-Year Operating Experience: 2002–2001. U.S. Department of Energy–EPRI Wind Turbine Verification Program. 1004041. Final Report, December 2001.
5.
Big Spring Wind Power Project Second-Year Operating Experience: 2002–2001. U.S. Department of Energy–EPRI Wind Turbine Verification Program. 1004042. Final Report, December 2001.
6.
Kelley, Neil, Shirazi, Mari, Hand, Maureen, and Jager, David, 2002 “Low-Level Jet Turbulence Field Test,” NREL/NWTC, 2002 DOE Wind Program Review Meeting, May 7–9.
7.
MATLAB Version 5.3 and SIMULINK, 1999, The Mathworks, Inc.
8.
Hansen, A.C., 1997 “Users Guide to the Wind Turbine Dynamics Computer Programs YawDyn and AeroDyn for ADAMS, Version 10.0,” Mech. Eng. Dept., Univ. of Utah, June 23.
You do not currently have access to this content.