The potential for site specific design of MW sized wind turbines is quantified by comparing design loads for wind turbines installed at a range of different sites. The sites comprise on-shore normal flat terrain stand-alone conditions and wind farm conditions together with offshore and mountainous complex terrain wind farms. The design loads are established for a 1 MW active stall regulated wind turbine with the aeroelastic code HAWC. The load analysis is limited to fatigue loads. We do not consider ultimate loads in this paper. The results illustrate the differences in design wind conditions for different sites and the related differences in design loads for the 1 MW wind turbine. Based on the difference in the design loads, the potentials for site specific design of the wind turbine main components are identified. The results show that the variation in aerodynamically driven loads and energy production can be more than 50% between the different sites. It is concluded that site specific design is feasible for some of the main components. In particular, site specific changes are feasible for the tower, nacelle components, and for the blades in the flapwise direction. It is also evaluated whether the IEC61400-1 standard [see Ref. [4], International Electrochemical Commission (1999)] is representative for the different sites. A comparison with design loads based on the IEC61400-1 illustrates that the six different sites can be described by the standard design classes.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
wind power plants, wind turbines, power generation planning, IEC standards
Topics:
Design, Stress, Wind, Wind turbines, Wind velocity, Turbulence, Wind farms, Climate
1.
Frandsen, S. (ed.), Chaco´n, L., Crespo, A., Enevoldsen, P., Go´mez-Elvira, R., Herna´ndez, J., Højstrup, J., Manuel, F., and Thomsen, K., 1996, “Measurements on and Modelling of Offshore Wind Farms,” (Risø-R-903(EN)), Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark.
2.
Sanderhoff, P., 1993, “PARK-User’s Guide,” A PC-program for calculation of wind turbine park performance, (Risø-I-668(EN)), Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark.
3.
Charnock
,
H.
,
1955
, “
Wind stress over a water surface
,”
Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.
,
81
,
639
–
640
.
4.
International Electrotechnical Commission IEC61400-1 (Second Edition 1999-02), 1999, Wind Turbine Generator Systems, Part 1: Safety Requirements, Geneva, Switzerland.
5.
Thomsen, K., S.M. Petersen, J.T. Petersen, S. O̸ye, and M. Friedrich, 1996, “Terrain Induced Loads on Pitch Regulated Wind Turbines,” (Risø-R-846(EN)), Risø National Lab., Roskilde, Denmark.
6.
Panofsky, H. A., and Dutton, J. A., 1984, Atmospheric Turbulence: Models and Methods for Engineering Applications. Wiley, New York.
7.
Fuglsang, P., and Thomsen, K., 1998, “Site specific design optimization of wind turbines. In: A Collection of the 1998 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Technical Papers, 36, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 12-15 Jan 1998, AIAA, New York, pp. 294–303.
8.
Petersen, J. T., 1996, “The Aeroelastic Code HawC - Model and Comparisons,” in Proc. of 28th IEA Expert Meeting “State of the Art of Aeroelastic Codes,” Lyngby, Denmark.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.