In 1982 McDonnell Douglas Aerospace (MDA) and United Stirling AB (USAB) of Sweden formed a joint venture to develop and market a solar Stirling dish system. Eight modules were built and extensively tested from 1984 to 1988. Power production and daily energy-conversion efficiency as determined by field testing were characterized and modeled into a computer program. Included in this simulation are models of mirror soiling rate, wind spillage loss, mirror washing, and other maintenance outage time, operation and maintenance (O&M) costs, and equipment purchase cost. An economic model of a hybrid (combustion) receiver has been included in the simulation for illustrating the value of using solar energy when available and other fuels such as methane, natural gas, hydrogen, etc. when solar energy is not available or adequate. This paper describes the simulation and presents comparisons of the simulation to test data. The simulation also estimates both the O&M expenses and levelized energy costs for different production volumes.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Aerospace industry, Combustion, Computer software, Energy conversion, Energy generation, Fuels, Hydrogen, Maintenance, Methane, Mirrors, Natural gas, Simulation, Solar energy, Testing, Wind
1.
Dietrich, J. J., and Radtke, C. W., 1985, “Production Planning and Cost Reduction of the Parabolic Dish Concentrator,” Vol. 1, MDC H2282, Nov.
2.
Dietrich, J. J., and Radtke, C. W., 1985, “Production Planning and Cost Reduction of the Parabolic Dish Concentrator,” Vol. 2, MDC H2282, Nov.
3.
Doane, J. W., O’Toole, R. P., Chamberlain, R. G., Bos, P. B., and Maycock, P. D., 1976, “The Cost of Energy from Utility-owned Solar Electric Systems,” JPL 5040-29, ERDA/JPL-1012-76/3, EPRI, June 1976.
4.
Droher, J. J., and Squier, S. E., 1986, “Performance of the Vanguard Solar-Stirling Engine Module,” Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI AP-4608, July.
5.
Fish, M. J., 1981, “Comparative Economics of Solar Thermal Central Receivers,” SAND-81-8236, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Aug.
6.
Lopez, C. W., and Stone, K. W., 1993, “Performance of the Southern California Edison Company Stirling Dish,” SAND93-7098, Oct.
7.
Lopez
C. W.
, and
Stone
K. W.
,
1992
, “
Design and Performance of the Southern California Edison Stirling Dish
,”
ASME Solar Engineering
, Vol.
2
; pp.
945
–
952
.
8.
Pons, R. L., and Dugan, A. F., 1984, “The Effect of Concentrator Field Layout on the Performance of Point-Focus Distributed Receiver Systems,” ASME JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING, Vol. 106.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1995
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.