Results obtained from high temperature creep tests of ferritic steel CrMoV, P91 and P92 cross-weld specimens are compared. Data are presented normalized with the results of the corresponding parent metals in order to compare the materials tested at different temperatures and stresses, and to identify characteristic cross-weld material trends. All cross-weld failures occurred in the heat-affected zone (HAZ) adjacent to the parent metal, known as type IV, at earlier test durations than for the parent material specimens. The relative performance of the cross-welds was found to decrease with decreasing stress. The CrMoV cross-weld specimens showed by far the lowest weld strength reduction factors and greatest notch strengthening, determined by testing uniaxially loaded bars with semicircular circumferential notches located in the heat-affected zone. The P91 and P92 cross-weld specimens were found to have similar (high) weld strength reduction factors and showed little or no notch strengthening. The failure time of a P92 cross-weld specimen relative to the P92 parent material could be estimated using data from P91 cross-weld and relative parent material tests.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2013
Research-Article
Cross-Weld Creep Comparison of Power Plant Steels CrMoV, P91 and P92
David W. J. Tanner,
Thomas H. Hyde
Thomas H. Hyde
e-mail: thomas.hyde@nottingham.ac.uk
Materials, Mechanics & Structures
Research Division
,Faculty of Engineering
,The University of Nottingham
,Nottingham NG7 2RD
, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
David W. J. Tanner
e-mail: david.tanner@nottingham.ac.uk
Wei Sun
e-mail: w.sun@nottingham.ac.uk
Thomas H. Hyde
e-mail: thomas.hyde@nottingham.ac.uk
Materials, Mechanics & Structures
Research Division
,Faculty of Engineering
,The University of Nottingham
,Nottingham NG7 2RD
, UK
Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. Manuscript received August 16, 2012; final manuscript received January 8, 2013; published online March 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: David L. Rudland.
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. Apr 2013, 135(2): 021408 (5 pages)
Published Online: March 18, 2013
Article history
Received:
August 16, 2012
Revision Received:
January 8, 2013
Citation
Tanner, D. W. J., Sun, W., and Hyde, T. H. (March 18, 2013). "Cross-Weld Creep Comparison of Power Plant Steels CrMoV, P91 and P92." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. April 2013; 135(2): 021408. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023430
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Surface Strain Measurement for Non-Intrusive Internal Pressure Evaluation of A Cannon
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
The Upper Bound of the Buckling Stress of Axially Compressed Carbon Steel Circular Cylindrical Shells
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (December 2024)
Crack Growth Prediction Based on Uncertain Parameters Using Ensemble Kalman Filter
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (December 2024)
Defect Detection of Polyethylene Gas Pipeline Based on Convolutional Neural Networks and Image Processing
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Related Articles
The Impact of Weld Metal Creep Strength on the Overall Creep Strength of 9% Cr Steel Weldments
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,2011)
Weldment Evaluation of High Pressure Steam Rotors
J. Eng. Ind (November,1994)
Performance of Dissimilar Welds in Service
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,1985)
A Simplified Approach to the Effect of Specimen Size on the Creep Rupture of Cross Weld Samples
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (January,1982)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Subsection NG—Core Support Structures
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1 Sixth Edition
Basic Concepts
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range
Basic Concepts
Analysis of ASME Boiler, Pressure Vessel, and Nuclear Components in the Creep Range