The use of creep strength enhanced ferritic alloys, such as Grade 91, in fossil power plants has become popular for high temperature applications. Since Grade 91 has higher stress allowables than Grade 22, a designer can specify thinner component wall thicknesses, resulting in lower throughwall thermal stresses during transient events and lower material and pipe support costs. During the past two decades, Grade 91 has been used successfully in fossil power plants. However, this alloy has had some incidents of premature failures. Case histories discuss such factors as excessively hard material, extremely soft material, overheating failures, and improper mill processing. This compilation also discusses likely root causes and solutions to avoid these potential Grade 91 problems.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Papers
Fabrication, Construction, and Operation Problems for Grade 91 Fossil Power Components
Marvin J. Cohn,
Marvin J. Cohn
Aptech Engineering Services, Inc.
, Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeffrey F. Henry,
Jeffrey F. Henry
Alstom Power Inc.
, Chattanooga, TN 37402
Search for other works by this author on:
Dan Nass
Dan Nass
Arizona Public Service Company
, Phoenix, AZ 85004
Search for other works by this author on:
Marvin J. Cohn
Aptech Engineering Services, Inc.
, Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Jeffrey F. Henry
Alstom Power Inc.
, Chattanooga, TN 37402
Dan Nass
Arizona Public Service Company
, Phoenix, AZ 85004J. Pressure Vessel Technol. May 2005, 127(2): 197-203 (7 pages)
Published Online: November 22, 2004
Article history
Received:
November 3, 2004
Revised:
November 22, 2004
Citation
Cohn, M. J., Henry, J. F., and Nass, D. (November 22, 2004). "Fabrication, Construction, and Operation Problems for Grade 91 Fossil Power Components." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. May 2005; 127(2): 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1904054
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
On the possibility of extending the crack length criterion in the master curve methodology
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Investigation of Fracture Prediction Capability of XFEM and FEM using SENT Specimens
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
The Behavior of Elbow Elements at Pure Bending Applications Compared to Beam and Shell Element Models
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February 2025)
Related Articles
Recommended Revisions to Nuclear Piping Thermal Expansion Stress Limits
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2011)
Validation of Creep Crack Growth Life Estimation Methodology/Hot
Reheat Steam Pipes
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,1994)
Failure Investigation on Reheater Pendent Tubes Due to External Scale Exfoliation and Internal Scale Formation
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (December,2011)
A Risk-Informed Approach to Leak-Before-Break Assessment of Pressure Tubes in CANDU Reactors
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Subsection NB—Class 1 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1 Sixth Edition
Applications of Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics in Section XI, ASME Code Evaluations
Online Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes
Members in Bending
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range