On the occasion of recent great earthquakes, great concern is focused on the prevention of unstable fracture of steel structures against the seismic loading. This paper employs the local approach for the evaluation of prestraining and dynamic loading effects, experienced during an earthquake, on the fracture toughness of structural steels. The prestraining and dynamic loading lead to a similar result: increasing the yield stress and tensile strength and decreasing the fracture toughness. It is shown, however, that the combined effects of prestraining and dynamic loading is not equivalent to the sum of each individual effect. The analysis using the local approach demonstrates that the critical Weibull stress at brittle fracture initiation is independent of prestraining and dynamic loading. Based on the Weibull stress fracture criterion, the prestraining and dynamic loading effects on the fracture toughness can be predicted from static toughness results of the virgin material. As an engineering application, a simplified method is proposed for the estimation of fracture toughness under the seismic condition. This method uses a reference temperature concept: the dynamic fracture toughness at the service temperature T with prestrain is displaced by the static toughness of the virgin material at a lower temperature TΔTPD, where ΔTPD is a temperature shift of the fracture toughness caused by prestraining and dynamic loading. The temperature shift ΔTPD is provided as a function of the flow stress elevation in the seismic condition.

1.
Toyoda
,
M.
,
1995
, “
How Steel Structures Fared in Japan’s Great Earthquake
,”
Weld. J. (Miami)
,
74
, No.
12
, pp.
31
42
.
2.
Hashida, T., Fujihira, S., Morikawa, J., Minami, F., and Toyoda, M., 1998, “Fracture Toughness and Mechanical Properties of Beam-to-Column Connections of Steel Framed Structures Damaged in Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake,” Proc., Int. Conf. on Welded Constructions in Seismic Areas, Maui, Hawaii, pp. 215–225.
3.
APD Committee, 1997, “Strength and Fracture Toughness of Weld Connections in Steel Framed Structures” (in Japanese), Proc., Seminar on Seismic Damage to Steel Framed Structures and Steel Properties, Tokyo, The Japan Welding Engineering Society, JWES-IS-9701, pp. 47–192.
4.
Bennett, P. E., and Sinclair, G. M., 1965, “Parameter Representation of Low-Temperature Yield Behavior of Body-Centered Cubic Transition Metals,” ASME 65-MET-11.
5.
Beremin
,
F. M.
,
1983
, “
A Local Criterion for Cleavage Fracture of a Nuclear Pressure Vessel Steel
,”
Metall. Trans. A
,
14A
, pp.
2277
2287
.
6.
Mudry
,
F.
,
1987
, “
A Local Approach to Cleavage Fracture
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
105
, pp.
65
76
.
7.
Kuwamura
,
H.
, and
Maeda
,
K.
,
1990
, “
Strain-Rate Effect on the Mechanical Properties of Low-Yield-Ratio High-Strength Steel
” (in Japanese),
J. Struct. Eng.
,
36B
, pp.
89
101
.
8.
Fujii
,
E.
,
Ohkuma
,
I.
,
Kawaguchi
,
Y.
, and
Tsukamoto
,
M.
,
1985
, “
Effects of Temperature and Strain Rate on Dynamic Fracture Toughness of Steel
” (in Japanese),
J. Soc. Naval Architects Jpn
,
158
, pp.
619
629
.
9.
Nakano
,
Y.
,
Sakai
,
Y.
,
Yagawa
,
G.
,
Ando
,
K.
, and
Ando
,
Y.
,
1988
, “
Dynamic Fracture Toughness of LWR Pressure Vessel Steel A508 Cl. 3: A Japanese Round-Robin Study
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
31
, pp.
255
270
.
10.
Toyosada
,
M.
,
Fujii
,
E.
,
Nohara
,
K.
,
Kawaguchi
,
Y.
,
Arimochi
,
K.
, and
Isaka
,
K.
,
1987
, “
The Effect of Strain Rate on Critical CTOD and J Integral
” (in Japanese),
J. Soc. Naval Architects Jpn
,
161
, pp.
343
356
.
11.
Toyosada
,
M.
, and
Gotoh
,
K.
,
1992
, “
The Estimating Method of Critical CTOD and J Integral at Arbitrary Crosshead Speed
” (in Japanese),
J. Soc. Naval Architects Jpn
,
172
, pp.
663
674
.
12.
Toyosada
,
M.
,
Gotoh
,
K.
, and
Sagara
,
K.
,
1991
, “
Temperature Rise Distribution Near a Crack Tip Due to Plastic Work Under High Loading Rate
” (in Japanese),
J. Soc. Naval Architects Jpn
,
170
, pp.
651
663
.
13.
TM Committee, 1975, “Qualification of Steel Properties in Terms of Resistance to Brittle Fracture Initiation” (in Japanese), The Japan Welding Engineering Society.
14.
Euromech-Mecamat 1996, 1st European Mechanics of Materials Conference on Local Approach to Fracture 86–96, Fontainebleau, J. de Physique IV, 6, pp. 185–214, 243–257, 269–286, 295–304, 343–352.
15.
Wiesner, C. S., 1996, “The ‘Local Approach’ to Cleavage Fracture,” An Abington Publishing Special Report.
16.
Minami, F., Katou, T., Nakamura, T., and Arimochi, K., 1999, “Equivalent CTOD Concept for Fracture Toughness Requirement of Materials for Steel Structures,” Proc., Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, OMAE99/MAT-2130, pp. 1–12.
17.
Tagawa
,
T.
,
Chaves
,
C. E.
,
Yang
,
H.
,
Yoshinari
,
H.
, and
Miyata
,
T.
,
1999
, “
Specimen Size Requirement for Cleavage Fracture Toughness Based on the Weibull Stress Criterion
” (in Japanese),
J. Soc. Naval Architects Jpn
,
186
, pp.
485
497
.
18.
Minami
,
F.
,
Bru¨ckner-Foit
,
A.
,
Munz
,
D.
, and
Trolldenier
,
B.
,
1992
, “
Estimation Procedure for the Weibull Parameter Used in the Local Approach
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
54
, pp.
197
210
.
19.
Gao
,
X.
,
Ruggieri
,
C.
, and
Dodds
, Jr,
R. H.
,
1998
, “
Calibration of Weibull Stress Parameters Using Fracture Toughness Data
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
92
, pp.
175
200
.
20.
Minami, F., Ochiai, T., Hashida, T., Arimochi, K., and Konda, N., 2000, “Local Approach to Dynamic Fracture Toughness Evaluation,” ASTM STP 1389, Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 31, pp. 271–304.
21.
APD-II Committee, 1999, “Procedure for Brittle Fracture Evaluation of Steel Structures Subjected to Cyclic and Dynamic Large Deformation” (in Japanese), Proc., Seminar on Brittle Fracture Incidence in Steel Framed Structures and Fracture Toughness Properties of Structural Steels, Tokyo, The Japan Welding Engineering Society, JWES-IS-9901, pp. 57–142.
You do not currently have access to this content.