1-20 of 23954
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Journal Articles
Image
Problem geometry setup. The foot with attached frame M moves in contact with two virtual objects that define the terrain geometry in the vicinity of a contact location, such that the trajectories of A and B have known radii of curvature, RA and RB, respectively. The directions of the velocity vectors A˙ and B˙ are set to be perpendicular to the forces FA and FB by defining the point of intersection V of the lines of action of these two forces to be the velocity pole of the movement of M.
Published Online: March 20, 2025
Fig. 1 Problem geometry setup. The foot with attached frame M moves in contact with two virtual objects that define the terrain geometry in the vicinity of a contact location, such that the trajectories of A and B have known radii of curvature, R A and R B , respecti... More about this image found in Problem geometry setup. The foot with attached frame M moves in contact w...
Image
(a) Natural walking gait cycle trajectories at foot and knee levels, obtained from Motion Capture System. Data for the additional two-foot trajectories observable from walking on sand are adopted from Ref. [19] and shown along with the desired teardrop foot trajectory. (b) The “relaxed” kinematic task consists of only two contact locations with higher-order motion constraints, compatible with foot–environment interaction.
Published Online: March 20, 2025
Fig. 2 ( a ) Natural walking gait cycle trajectories at foot and knee levels, obtained from Motion Capture System. Data for the additional two-foot trajectories observable from walking on sand are adopted from Ref. [ 19 ] and shown along with the desired teardrop foot trajectory. ( b ) The “relaxe... More about this image found in ( a ) Natural walking gait cycle trajectories at foot and knee levels, obta...
Image
(a and b) The motion of point G of the obtained four-bar linkage OADC based on the scaled down “relaxed” kinematic task. The base pivots are denoted by O and C and the moving pivots are A and D. The trajectory of point G represents the actual knee motion of the eight-bar leg to be designed, point C represents the hip joint, while CG is sized according to the subject’s anthropometric femur data. (c) One-degree-of-freedom eight-bar leg design driven by the input crank OA.
Published Online: March 20, 2025
Fig. 3 ( a and b ) The motion of point G of the obtained four-bar linkage O A D C based on the scaled down “relaxed” kinematic task. The base pivots are denoted by O and C and the moving pivots are A and D . The trajectory of point G represents the actual knee motion of the eig... More about this image found in ( a and b ) The motion of point G of the obtained four-bar linkage O ...
Image
(a) Crank OA rotates the upper leg and leaves the lower leg in the same orientation. (b) Crank O′A′ rotates the lower leg and leaves the knee G fixed. (c) Initial mesh at 252.5 deg and the 7.5 deg reconfiguration kick
Published Online: March 20, 2025
Fig. 4 ( a ) Crank OA rotates the upper leg and leaves the lower leg in the same orientation. (b) Crank O′A′ rotates the lower leg and leaves the knee G fixed. (c) Initial mesh at 252.5 deg and the 7.5 deg reconfiguration kick More about this image found in ( a ) Crank OA rotates the upper leg and leaves the lower leg in the same o...
Image
Identified human-like foot trajectory patterns of interest. Row I: obstacle avoidance/climbing staircase at (a) 290 deg, (b) 282.5 deg, (c) 275 deg, (d) 267.5 deg, and (e) 260 deg. Row II: walking on soft/softer sandy ground/mud at (f) 252.5 deg, (g) 245 deg, (h) 237.5 deg, (i) 230 deg, and (j) 222.5 deg. Row III: walking on hard sandy ground at (k) 215 deg, (l) 207.5 deg, (m) 200 deg, (n) 192.5 deg, and (o) 185 deg. Row IV: natural walking trajectory at (p) 177.5 deg, (q) 170 deg, (r) 162.5 deg, and (s) 155.
Published Online: March 20, 2025
Fig. 5 Identified human-like foot trajectory patterns of interest. Row I: obstacle avoidance/climbing staircase at ( a ) 290 deg, ( b ) 282.5 deg, ( c ) 275 deg, ( d ) 267.5 deg, and ( e ) 260 deg. Row II: walking on soft/softer sandy ground/mud at ( f ) 252.5 deg, ( g ... More about this image found in Identified human-like foot trajectory patterns of interest. Row I: obstacle...
Image
(a) RH-KAFO design at the initial stance position moving through the teardrop shape trajectory (left) and RH-KAFO reconfigured (right): bottom gear is at the same position, while the top gear is at the configuration for the desired step climbing/obstacle avoidance trajectory. (b) Natural knee joint motion (top left) versus RH-KAFO knee joint motion (top right), as well as natural hip joint motion (bottom left) versus H-KAFO hip joint motion (bottom right) for following a natural walking trajectory.
Published Online: March 20, 2025
Fig. 6 ( a ) RH-KAFO design at the initial stance position moving through the teardrop shape trajectory (left) and RH-KAFO reconfigured (right): bottom gear is at the same position, while the top gear is at the configuration for the desired step climbing/obstacle avoidance trajectory. ( b ... More about this image found in ( a ) RH-KAFO design at the initial stance position moving through the ...
Image
(a) Kinematic model of the lower leg in the sagittal plane and (b) the 2R hip-knee leg model chosen by the designer and the trajectory traced by a marker placed at the distal end of the left foot of the user relative to a fixed thigh frame. The ankle is designed as a 3D passive joint (left). Human foot motion trajectory obtained from Motion Capture System (right).
Published Online: March 20, 2025
Fig. 7 ( a ) Kinematic model of the lower leg in the sagittal plane and ( b ) the 2R hip-knee leg model chosen by the designer and the trajectory traced by a marker placed at the distal end of the left foot of the user relative to a fixed thigh frame. The ankle is designed as a 3D passive ... More about this image found in ( a ) Kinematic model of the lower leg in the sagittal plane and ( b ...
Image
Experimental testing of the RH-KAFO. Comparison between the simulated and the RH-KAFO generated trajectories with regard to the desired object step climbing (a−d), comparison between the simulated and the RH-KAFO generated trajectories with regard to walking on soft sand/mud (e−h), comparison between the simulated and the RH-KAFO generated trajectories with regard to walking on hard sand (i−l), and comparison between the simulated and the RH-KAFO generated trajectories with regard to natural walking trajectory (m−p).
Published Online: March 20, 2025
Fig. 8 Experimental testing of the RH-KAFO. Comparison between the simulated and the RH-KAFO generated trajectories with regard to the desired object step climbing ( a − d ), comparison between the simulated and the RH-KAFO generated trajectories with regard to walking on soft sand/mud ( e... More about this image found in Experimental testing of the RH-KAFO. Comparison between the simulated and t...
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image