Abstract

Kinematic synthesis to meet an approximate motion specification naturally forms a constrained optimization problem. Instead of using local methods, we conduct global design searches by direct computation of all critical points. The idea is not new, but performed at scale is only possible through modern polynomial homotopy continuation solvers. Such a complete computation finds all minima, including the global, which allows for a full exploration of the design space, whereas local solvers can only find the minimum nearest to an initial guess. We form equality-constrained objective functions that pertain to the synthesis of spherical four-bar linkages for approximate function generation. We consider the general case where all mechanism dimensions may vary and a more specific case that enables the placement of ground pivots. The former optimization problem is shown to permit 268 sets of critical points, and the latter permits 61 sets. Critical points are classified as saddles or minima through a post-process eigenanalysis of the projected Hessian. The discretization points are contained within the coefficients of the stationarity polynomials, so the algebraic structure of the synthesis equations remains invariant to the number of points. The results of our computational work were used to design a mechanism that coordinates the folding wings. We also use this method to parameterize mechanism dimensions for a family of hyperbolic curves.

Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

References

1.
Freudenstein
,
F.
,
2022
, “
An Analytical Approach to the Design of Four-Link Mechanisms
,”
Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.
,
76
(
3
), pp.
483
489
.
2.
Roth
,
B.
,
1967
, “
Finite-Position Theory Applied to Mechanism Synthesis
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
34
(
3
), pp.
599
605
.
3.
Hartenberg
,
R. S.
, and
Denavit
,
J.
,
1964
,
Kinematic Synthesis of Linkages
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
4.
Zimmerman
,
J. R.
,
1967
, “
Four-Precision-Point Synthesis of the Spherical Four-Bar Function Generator
,”
J. Mech.
,
2
(
2
), pp.
133
139
.
5.
Lakshminarayana
,
K.
,
1972
, “
On the Synthesis of the Spherical Four-bar
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
7
(
1
), pp.
63
69
.
6.
Watanabe
,
K.
,
1970
, “
Approximate Synthesis of Spherical Four-Bar Mechanisms
,”
Bull. JSME
,
13
(
58
), pp.
607
615
.
7.
Alizade
,
R. I.
, and
Kilit
,
Ö.
,
2005
, “
Analytical Synthesis of Function Generating Spherical Four-Bar Mechanism for the Five Precision Points
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
40
(
7
), pp.
863
878
.
8.
Cervantes-Sánchez
,
J. J.
,
Gracia
,
L.
,
Rico-Martínez
,
J. M.
,
Medellín-Castillo
,
H. I.
, and
González-Galván
,
E. J.
,
2009
, “
A Novel and Efficient Kinematic Synthesis Approach of the Spherical 4R Function Generator for Five and Six Precision Points
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
44
(
11
), pp.
2020
2037
.
9.
Jiawei
,
W.
,
Xiyuan
,
C.
,
Shiqi
,
W.
,
Xiang
,
L.
,
Ying
,
Z.
, and
Duanling
,
L.
,
2019
, “
The Algebraic Solution to the Spherical 4R Function Generator for Six Precision Points
,”
2019 IEEE 9th Annual International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER)
,
Suzhou, China
,
July 29–Aug. 2
, pp.
42
47
.
10.
Rao
,
S. S.
, and
Ambekar
,
A. G.
,
1974
, “
Optimum Design of Spherical 4-R Function Generating Mechanisms
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
9
(
3
), pp.
405
410
.
11.
Liu
,
Z.
, and
Angeles
,
J.
,
1992
, “
Least-Square Optimization of Planar and Spherical Four-Bar Function Generator Under Mobility Constraints
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
114
(
4
), pp.
569
573
.
12.
Sancibrián
,
R.
,
Garcia
,
P.
,
Fernández
,
A.
, and
Viadero Rueda
,
F.
,
2007
, “
Optimal Synthesis of Function Generating Spherical and RSSR Mechanisms
,”
12th IFToMM World Congress
,
Besançon, France
,
June 18–21
, pp.
18
21
.
13.
Alizade
,
R.
, and
Gezgin
,
E.
,
2011
, “
Synthesis of Function Generating Spherical Four Bar Mechanism for the Six Independent Parameters
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
46
(
9
), pp.
1316
1326
.
14.
Farhang
,
K.
, and
Zargar
,
Y. S.
,
1999
, “
Design of Spherical 4R Mechanisms: Function Generation for the Entire Motion Cycle
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
121
(
4
), pp.
521
528
.
15.
Baskar
,
A.
,
Plecnik
,
M.
, and
Hauenstein
,
J. D.
,
2022
, “
Computing Saddle Graphs Via Homotopy Continuation for the Approximate Synthesis of Mechanisms
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
176
, p.
104932
.
16.
Morgan
,
A. P.
, and
Sommese
,
A. J.
,
1989
, “
Coefficient-Parameter Polynomial Continuation
,”
Appl. Math. Comput.
,
29
(
2
), pp.
123
160
.
17.
Baskar
,
A.
, and
Plecnik
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Synthesis of Six-Bar Timed Curve Generators of Stephenson-type Using Random Monodromy Loops
,”
ASME J. Mech. Rob.
,
13
(
1
), p.
011005
.
18.
Bates
,
D. J.
,
Hauenstein
,
J. D.
,
Sommese
,
A. J.
, and
Wampler
,
C. W.
,
2006
, Bertini: Software for Numerical Algebraic Geometry.
You do not currently have access to this content.