This paper focuses on modeling the gait characteristics of a quadrupedal gallop. There have been a number of studies of the mechanics of the stance phase in which a foot is in contact with the ground. We seek to put these studies in the context of the stride, or overall motion cycle. The model used is theoretical, and is kept simple in the interest of transparency. It is compared to empirical data from observations of animals, and to data from experiments with robots such as our KOLT machine, and results from sophisticated simulation studies. Modeling of the energy loss inherent in the interaction between the system and the environment plays a key role in the study. Results include the discovery of a hidden symmetry in the gait pattern, usually regarded as being completely asymmetrical. Another result demonstrates that the velocities with which the two front feet impact and leave the ground are different, and similarly for the rear feet. The velocities of the foot pairs mirror each other. This is consistent with empirical observation, but is at variance with the assumption used almost universally when modeling stance. A further result elicits the importance of the pitch moment of inertia and other effects that make the mammalian architecture, in which the center of mass is closer to the shoulders than to the hips, beneficial..

1.
Waldron
,
K. J.
, 2007, “
A Coordination Scheme for an Asymmetrically Running Quadruped
,”
Proceedings of the IFToMM World Congress
(
CD-ROM Proceedings
),
Besançon, France
, Session No. RB-6, Paper No. 757.
2.
Krasny
,
D. P.
, and
Orin
,
D. E.
, 2004, “
Generating High-Speed Dynamic Running Gaits in a Quadruped Robot Using an Evolutionary Search
,”
IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Part B: Cybern.
1083-4419,
34
(
4
), pp.
1685
1696
.
3.
Walter
,
R. M.
, and
Carrier
,
D. R.
, 2007, “
Ground Forces Applied by Galloping Dogs
,”
J. Exp. Biol.
0022-0949,
210
, pp.
208
216
.
4.
Schmiedeler
,
J. P.
,
Siston
,
R.
, and
Waldron
,
K. J.
, 2002, “
The Significance of Leg Mass in Modeling Quadrupedal Running Gaits
,”
ROMANSY 14: Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators
,
G.
Bianchi
,
J. C.
Guinot
, and
C.
Rzymkowski
, eds.,
Springer
,
New York
, pp.
481
488
.
5.
Jayes
,
A. S.
, and
Alexander
,
R. M.
, 1978, “
Mechanics of Locomotion of Dogs and Sheep
,”
J. Zool.
0022-5460,
185
, pp.
289
308
.
6.
Pandy
,
M. G.
,
Kumar
,
V.
,
Waldron
,
K. J.
, and
Berme
,
N.
, 1988, “
The Dynamics of Quadrupedal Locomotion
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
110
(
3
), pp.
230
237
.
7.
Alexander
,
R. McN.
, and
Jayes
,
A. S.
, 1983, “
A Dynamic Similarity Hypothesis for the Gaits of Quadrupedal Mammals
,”
J. Zool.
0022-5460,
201
, pp.
135
152
.
8.
Gambaryan
,
P. P.
, 1974,
How Mammals Run: Anatomical Adaptions
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
9.
Abdallah
,
M. E.
, and
Waldron
,
K. J.
, 2007, “
Stiffness and Duty Factor Models for the Design of Running Bipeds
,”
Advances in Climbing and Walking Robots
,
M.
Xie
,
S.
Dubowsky
,
J. G.
Fontaine
,
M. O.
Tokhi
, and
G. S.
Virk
, eds.,
World Scientific
,
Singapore
, pp.
329
339
.
10.
Schmiedeler
,
J. P.
, and
Waldron
,
K. J.
, 1999, “
The Effect of Drag on Gait Selection in Dynamic Quadrupedal Locomotion
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
0278-3649,
18
(
12
), pp.
1224
1234
.
11.
Raibert
,
M. H.
, 1986,
Legged Robots That Balance
,
MIT
,
Cambridge, MA
.
12.
Saranli
,
U.
,
Schwind
,
J.
, and
Koditschek
,
D.
, 1998, “
Toward the Control of a Multi-Jointed, Monopod Runner
,”
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
,
Leuven, Belgium
.
13.
Heglund
,
N. C.
,
Cavagna
,
G. A.
, and
Taylor
,
C. R.
, 1982, “
Energetics and Mechanics of Locomotion III: Energy Changes of the Centre of Mass as a Function of Speed and Body Size in Birds and Mammals
,”
J. Exp. Biol.
0022-0949,
79
, pp.
41
56
.
14.
Raibert
,
M. H.
, and
Hodgins
,
J.
, 1991, “
Animation of Dynamic Legged Locomotion
,”
Comput. Graph.
0097-8930,
25
, pp.
349
358
.
15.
Estremera
,
J.
, and
Waldron
,
K. J.
, 2006, “
Leg Thrust Control for Stabilization of Dynamic Gaits in a Quadruped Robot
,”
Proceedings of ROMANSY 2006
,
Warsaw, Poland
, Jun. 20–22, pp.
213
220
.
16.
Estremera
,
J.
, and
Waldron
,
K. J.
, 2008, “
Thrust Control, Stabilization and Energetics of a Quadruped Running Robot
,”
Int. J. Robot. Res.
0278-3649, in press.
17.
Ruina
,
A.
,
Bertram
,
J. E. A.
, and
Srinivasan
,
M.
, 2005, “
A Collisional Model of the Energetic Cost of Support Work in Walking and Galloping, Pseudoelastic Leg Behavior in Running and the Walk-to-Run Transition
,”
J. Theor. Biol.
0022-5193,
237
, pp.
170
192
.
18.
Minetti
,
A. E.
, 1998, “
The Biomechanics of Skipping Gaits: A Third Locomotion Paradigm?
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B
0962-8452,
265
, pp.
1227
1235
.
19.
Waldron
,
K. J.
, and
Kallem
,
V.
, 2004, “
Control Modes for a Three-Dimensional Galloping Machine
,”
Proceedings of ASME Mechanisms Conference
, Paper No. DETC2004-57587.
20.
Singh
,
S.
, and
Waldron
,
K.
, 2007, “
Robotic Harness for the Field Assessment of Galloping Gaits
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
, pp.
4247
2452
.
You do not currently have access to this content.