Microgeometry optimization has become an important phase of gear design that can remarkably enhance gear performance. For spiral bevel and hypoid gears, microgeometry is typically represented by ease-off topography. The optimal ease-off shape can be defined as the outcome of a process where generally conflicting objective functions are simultaneously minimized (or maximized), in the presence of constraints. This matter naturally lends itself to be framed as a multi-objective optimization problem. This paper proposes a general algorithmic framework for ease-off multi-objective optimization, with special attention given to computational efficiency. Its implementation is fully detailed. A simulation model for loaded tooth contact analysis is assumed to be available. The proposed method is demonstrated on a face-hobbed hypoid gear set. Three objectives are defined: maximization of gear mesh mechanical efficiency, minimization of loaded transmission error, minimization of maximum contact pressure. Bound constraints on the design variables are imposed, as well as a nonlinear constraint aimed at keeping the loaded contact pattern inside a predefined allowable contact region. The results show that the proposed method can obtain optimal ease-off topographies that significantly improve the basic design performances. It is also evident that the method is general enough to handle geometry optimization of any gear type.

References

1.
Litvin
,
F. L.
, 1989,
Theory of Gearing
,
NASA, Reference Publication
1212
.
2.
Stadtfeld
,
H. J.
, 1993,
Handbook of Bevel and Hypoid Gears
,
Rochester Institute of Technology
,
Rochester, NY
.
3.
Achtmann
,
J.
, and
Bär
,
G.
, 2003, “
Optimized Bearing Ellipses of Hypoid Gears
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
125
, pp.
739
745
.
4.
Stadtfeld
,
H. J.
, and
Gaiser
,
U.
, 2000, “
The Ultimate Motion Graph
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
122
, pp.
317
322
.
5.
Wang
,
P.-Y.
, and
Fong
,
Z.-H.
, 2006, “
Fourth-Order Kinematic Synthesis for Face-Milling Spiral Bevel Gears With Modified Radial Motion (MRM) Correction
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
128
, pp.
457
467
.
6.
Artoni
,
A.
,
Bracci
,
A.
,
Gabiccini
,
M.
, and
Guiggiani
,
M.
, 2009, “
Optimization of the Loaded Contact Pattern in Hypoid Gears by Automatic Topography Modification
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
131
,
011008
.
7.
Artoni
,
A.
,
Kolivand
,
M.
, and
Kahraman
,
A.
, 2010. “
An Ease-Off Based Optimization of the Loaded Transmission Error of hypoid Gears
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
132
,
011010
.
8.
Gabiccini
,
M.
,
Bracci
,
A.
, and
Guiggiani
,
M.
, 2010. “
Robust Optimization of the Loaded Contact Pattern in Hypoid Gears With Uncertain Misalignments
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
132
,
041010
.
9.
Kolivand
,
M.
, and
Kahraman
,
A.
, 2009. “
A Load Distribution Model for Hypoid Gears Using Ease-Off Topography and Shell Theory
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
44
(
10
), pp.
1848
1865
.
10.
Artoni
,
A.
,
Gabiccini
,
M.
, and
Guiggiani
,
M.
, 2008, “
Nonlinear Identification of Machine Settings for Flank Form Modifications in Hypoid Fears
,”
J. Mech. Des.
,
130
,
112602
.
11.
Miettinen
,
K. M.
, 1999,
Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization
,
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
Norwell, MA
.
12.
Deb
,
K.
, 2001,
Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
Chichester, West Sussex, England
.
13.
Branke
,
J.
,
Deb
,
K.
,
Miettinen
,
K.
, and
Słowiński
,
R.
, eds., 2008, “
Multiobjective Optimization—Interactive and Evolutionary Approaches
,”
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
, Vol.
5252
.
14.
Wierzbicki
,
A. P.
, 1979, “
The Use of Reference Objectives in Multiobjective Optimization—Theoretical Implications and Practical Experience, WP-79-66
,” International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
15.
Gill
,
P. E.
,
Murray
,
W.
, and
Wright
,
M. H.
, 1982,
Practical Optimization
,
Academic Press
,
London and New York
.
16.
Nocedal
,
J.
, and
Wright
,
S. J.
, 2006, “
Numerical Optimization
,”
Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering
,
Springer
,
New York
.
17.
Neumaier
,
A.
, Global Optimization Software, retrieved date December 16, 2010, www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/glopt/software_g.htmlwww.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/glopt/software_g.html
18.
Jones
,
D. R.
, 2001, “
Direct Global Optimization Algorithm
,” in
Encyclopedia of Optimization
,
C. A.
Floudas
and
P. M.
Pardalos
, eds.,
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands
, pp.
431
440
.
19.
Kelley
,
C. T.
, Implicit Filtering, retrieved date December 16, 2010, www4.ncsu.edu/~ctk/iffco.htmlwww4.ncsu.edu/~ctk/iffco.html
20.
TOMLAB, TOMLAB Base Module Solvers, retrieved date December 22, 2010, http://tomopt.com/tomlab/products/base/solvers/http://tomopt.com/tomlab/products/base/solvers/
21.
Kolivand
,
M.
,
Li
,
S.
, and
Kahraman
,
A.
, 2010, “
Prediction of Mechanical Gear Mesh Efficiency of Hypoid Gear Pairs
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
45
(
11
), pp.
1568
1582
.
22.
ANSI/AGMA 2005–D03, 2003, Design Manual for Bevel Gears, American Gear Manufacturers Association, 500 Montgomery Street, Suite 350, Alexandria, VA, http://www.agma.orghttp://www.agma.org.
23.
Finkel
,
D. E.
, 2005, “
Global Optimization With the DIRECT Algorithm
,” Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
You do not currently have access to this content.