Product recovery has become a field of rapidly growing interest for product manufacturers as a promising solution for product stewardship as well as for economic viability. Because product recovery is highly dependent on the way a product is designed, it should be considered in the design stage so that the product is designed to have high recovery potential. To make a product easy to recover, manufacturers first need to understand the links between product design and recovery profit and be able to evaluate which design is better than others and why. This study proposes a framework for analyzing how design differences affect product recovery and what architectural characteristics are desirable from the end-of-life perspective. For better design evaluation, an optimization-based model is developed, which considers product design and recovery network design simultaneously. For illustration, a comparative study with cell phone examples is presented. Three cell phone handset designs that share the same design concept but have different architectural characteristics are created, and the recovery potential of each design variant is evaluated under three different recovery scenarios. The results show that the framework can highlight preferred design alternatives and their design implications for the economic viability of end-of-life recovery.

1.
Kwak
,
M. J.
, and
Kim
,
H. M.
, 2009, “
Simultaneous Consideration of Product Design and End-of-Life Recovery Network Design
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design
, Stanford, CA.
2.
Mangun
,
D.
, and
Thurston
,
D. L.
, 2002, “
Incorporating Component Reuse, Remanufacture, and Recycle into Product Portfolio Design
,”
IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
0018-9391,
49
(
4
), pp.
479
490
.
3.
Fixson
,
S. K.
, 2004, “
Assessing Product Architecture Costing: Product Life Cycles, Allocation Rules, and Cost Models
,”
Proceedings of the ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences
, Salt Lake City, UT.
4.
Zhang
,
Y.
, and
Gershenson
,
J. K.
, 2002, “
Questioning the Direct Relationship between Product Modularity and Retirement Cost
,”
The Journal of Sustainable Product Design
1367-6679,
2
(
1–2
), pp.
53
68
.
5.
Kwak
,
M. J.
,
Hong
,
Y. S.
, and
Cho
,
N. W.
, 2009, “
Eco-Architecture Analysis for End-of-Life Decision Making
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
47
(
22
), pp.
6233
6259
.
6.
Dekker
,
R.
,
Fleischmann
,
M.
,
Inderfurth
,
K.
, and
Van Wasswnhove
,
L. N.
, 2004,
Reverse Logistics
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
7.
Fleischmann
,
M.
,
Beullens
,
P.
,
Bloemhof-Ruwaard
,
J. M.
, and
Van Wassenhove
,
L. N.
, 2001, “
The Impact of Product Recovery on Logistics Network Design
,”
Production and Operations Management
1059-1478,
10
(
2
), pp.
156
173
.
8.
Dowie
,
T.
, and
Kelly
,
P.
, 1994,
Estimation of Disassembly Times. Unpublished Technical Report
,
Manchester Metropolitan University
,
Manchester, UK
.
9.
Kroll
,
E.
, and
Carver
,
B. S.
, 1999, “
Disassembly Analysis Through Time Estimation and Other Metrics
,”
Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manufact.
0736-5845,
15
(
3
), pp.
191
200
.
10.
Das
,
S.
,
Yedlarajiah
,
P.
, and
Narendra
,
R.
, 2000, “
An Approach for Estimating the EOL Product Disassembly Effort and Cost
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
38
(
3
), pp.
657
673
.
11.
Marks
,
M. D.
,
Eubanks
,
C. F.
, and
Ishii
,
K.
, 1993, “
Life-Cycle Clumping of Product Designs for Ownership and Retirement
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology
, Albuquerque, NM, pp.
83
90
.
12.
Veerakamolmal
,
P.
, and
Gupta
,
S. M.
, 1999, “
Analysis of Design Efficiency for the Disassembly of Modular Electronic Products
,”
J. Electron. Manuf.
0960-3131,
9
(
1
), pp.
79
95
.
13.
Hula
,
A.
,
Jalali
,
K.
,
Hamza
,
K.
,
Skerlos
,
S. J.
, and
Saitou
,
K.
, 2003, “
Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Optimization of Product Disassembly Under Multiple Situations
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
0013-936X,
37
(
23
), pp.
5303
5313
.
14.
Shalaby
,
M.
and
Saitou
,
K.
, 2008, “
Design for Disassembly With High-Stiffness Heat-Reversible Locator-Snap Systems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
130
(
12
), p.
121701
.
15.
Shalaby
,
M.
and
Saitou
,
K.
, 2009, “
High-Stiffness, Lock-and-Key Heat-Reversible Locator-Snap Systems for the Design for Disassembly
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
131
(
4
), p.
041005
.
16.
Collado-Ruiz
,
D.
and
Capuz-Rizo
,
S. F.
, 2010, “
Modularity and Ease of Disassembly: Study of Electrical and Electronic Equipment
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
132
(
1
), p.
014502
.
17.
Gonzalez
,
B.
, and
Adenso-diaz
,
B.
, 2005, “
A Bill of Materials-Based Approach for EOL Decision Making in Design for the Environment
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
43
(
10
), pp.
2071
2099
.
18.
Pnueli
,
Y.
, and
Zussman
,
E.
, 1997, “
Evaluating the EOL Value of a Product and Improving It by Redesign
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
35
(
4
), pp.
921
942
.
19.
Erdos
,
G.
,
Kis
,
T.
, and
Xirouchakis
,
P.
, 2001, “
Modeling and Evaluating Product EOL Options
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
39
(
6
), pp.
1203
1220
.
20.
Lambert
,
A. J. D.
, 2002, “
Determining Optimum Disassembly Sequences in Electronic Equipment
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
0360-8352,
43
(
3
), pp.
553
575
.
21.
Seliger
,
G.
,
Basdere
,
B.
,
Ciupek
,
M.
, and
Franke
,
C.
, 2003,
CIRP Seminar on Life Cycle Engineering, Contribution to Efficient Cellular Phone Remanufacturing
, Copenhagen, Denmark.
22.
Gupta
,
S. M.
,
Erbis
,
E.
, and
McGovern
,
S. M.
, 2004, “
Disassembly Sequencing Problem: A Case Study of a Cell Phone
,”
SPIE International Conference on Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing IV
, Philadelphia, PA, pp.
43
52
.
You do not currently have access to this content.