The beam flexure is an important constraint element in flexure mechanism design. Nonlinearities arising from the force equilibrium conditions in a beam significantly affect its properties as a constraint element. Consequently, beam-based flexure mechanisms suffer from performance tradeoffs in terms of motion range, accuracy and stiffness, while benefiting from elastic averaging. This paper presents simple yet accurate approximations that capture the effects of load-stiffening and elastokinematic nonlinearities in beams. A general analytical framework is developed that enables a designer to parametrically predict the performance characteristics such as mobility, over-constraint, stiffness variation, and error motions, of beam-based flexure mechanisms without resorting to tedious numerical or computational methods. To illustrate their effectiveness, these approximations and analysis approach are used in deriving the force–displacement relationships of several important beam-based flexure constraint modules, and the results are validated using finite element analysis. Effects of variations in shape and geometry are also analytically quantified.

1.
Slocum
,
A. H.
, 1992,
Precision Machine Design
,
Society of Manufacturing Engineers
,
Dearborn, MI
.
2.
Blanding
,
D. K.
, 1999,
Exact Constraint: Machine Design Using Kinematic Principles
,
ASME
,
New York
.
3.
Smith
,
S. T.
, 2000,
Flexures: Elements of Elastic Mechanisms
,
Gordon and Breach Science
,
New York
.
4.
Ejik
,
J. V.
, 1985, “
On the Design of Plate Spring Mechanism
,” Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
5.
Awtar
,
S.
, 2004, “
Analysis and Synthesis of Planer Kinematic XY Mechanisms
,” Sc.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA (http://web.mit.edu/shorya/wwwhttp://web.mit.edu/shorya/www).
6.
Bisshopp
,
K. E.
, and
Drucker
,
D. C.
, 1945, “
Large Deflection of Cantilever Beams
,”
Q. Appl. Math.
0033-569X,
3
(
3
), pp.
272
275
.
7.
Frisch-Fay
,
R.
, 1963,
Flexible Bars
,
Butterworth
,
Washington, D.C
.
8.
Mattiasson
,
K.
, 1981, “
Numerical Results From Large Deflection Beam and Frame Problems Analyzed by Means of Elliptic Integrals
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
0029-5981,
17
, pp.
145
153
.
9.
Howell
,
L. L.
, 2001,
Compliant Mechanisms
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
10.
Plainevaux
,
J. E.
, 1956, “
Etude des Deformations d’une Lame de Suspension Elastique
,”
Nuovo Cimento
0029-6341,
4
, pp.
922
928
.
11.
Legtenberg
,
R.
,
Groeneveld
,
A. W.
, and
Elwenspoek
,
M.
, 1996, “
Comb-drive Actuators for Large Displacements
,”
J. Micromech. Microeng.
0960-1317,
6
, pp.
320
329
.
12.
Haringx
,
J. A.
, 1949, “
The Cross-Spring Pivot as a Constructional Element
,”
Appl. Sci. Res., Sect. A
0365-7132,
A1
(
4
), pp.
313
332
.
13.
Zelenika
,
S.
, and
DeBona
,
F.
, 2002, “
Analytical and Experimental Characterization of High Precision Flexural Pivots Subjected to Lateral Loads
,”
Precis. Eng.
0141-6359,
26
, pp.
381
388
.
14.
Jones
,
R. V.
, 1988,
Instruments and Experiences: Papers on Measurement and Instrument Design
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
15.
Zhou
,
G.
, and
Dowd
,
P.
, 2003, “
Tilted Folded-Beam Suspension for Extending the Stage Travel Range of Comb-Drive Actuators
,”
J. Micromech. Microeng.
0960-1317,
13
, pp.
178
183
.
16.
Saggere
,
L.
,
Kota
,
S.
, and
Crary
,
S. B.
, 1994, “
A New Design for Suspension of Linear Microactuators
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
2
, pp.
671
675
.
You do not currently have access to this content.