Nowadays, vehicle lightweight design is a main topic in automotive industry. Crashworthiness, which is the most important performance of a full vehicle, must be always satisfied in the study on body lightweight design. This paper presents research, from the point of view of safety, of structural lightweight design of the front side rail of a passenger car. The response surface method is used to create mathematical models that represent the relationship between structural sheet thicknesses and absorbed energy of the entire structure in the frontal crash simulation, and the relationship between structural sheet thicknesses and the mass of the entire structure. Then an optimization process is performed, and the structural mass and original absorbed energy are defined as objective and constraint functions, respectively. Minimum mass and structural sheet thicknesses are obtained with the satisfaction of original absorbed energy of the front side rail structure. The weight reduction of the front side rail is 26.95%.

1.
Joseph
,
C.
, and
Benedy
,
K.
, 2000, “
Light Metals in Automotive Applications
,”
Light Met. Age
0024-3345,
58
(
10
), pp.
34
35
.
2.
Osuga
,
R.
, 2001, “
Fuel Economy and Weight Reduction of Motor Vehicles
,”
J. Soc. Autom. Eng. Jpn.
,
55
(
4
), pp.
4
8
.
3.
Tamaki
,
Y.
, 1999, “
Research Into Achieving a Lightweight Vehicle Body Utilizing Structure Optimizing Analysis: Aim for a Lightweight and High and Rigid Vehicle Body
,”
JSAE Rev.
0389-4304,
53
(
20
), pp.
55
56
.
4.
Merklein
,
M.
, and
Geiger
,
M.
, 2002, “
New Materials and Production Technologies for Innovative Lightweight Constructions
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
25
(
125-126
), pp.
532
536
.
5.
Schubert
,
E.
,
Klassen
,
M.
,
Zerner
,
I.
,
Walz
,
C.
, and
Sepold
,
G.
, 2001, “
Light-Weight Structures Produced by Laser Beam Joining for Future Applications in Automobile and Aerospace Industry
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
24
(
115
), pp.
2
8
.
6.
Hopf
,
B.
, and
Birmans
,
C.
, 2001, “
Light-Weight Body-Current Status and Future Challenges
,” Chinese-German Ultralight Symposium, Beijing, Vol.
9
, pp.
201
207
.
7.
Asnafi
,
N.
, and
Langstedt
,
G.
, 2000, “
A New Lightweight Metal-Composite-Metal Panel for Applications in the Automotive and Other Industries
,”
Thin-Walled Struct.
0263-8231,
18
(
36
), pp.
289
310
.
8.
Craig
,
K. J.
,
Stander
,
N.
,
Dooge
,
D. A.
, and
Varadappa
,
S.
, 2005, “
Automotive Crashworthiness Design Using Response Surface-Based Variable Screening and Optimization
,”
Eng. Comput.
0177-0667,
22
(
1
), pp.
38
61
.
9.
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
Booker
,
A. J.
,
Ghosh
,
D.
,
Giunta
,
A. A.
,
Koch
,
P. N.
, and
Yang
,
R. J.
, 2004, “
Approximation Methods in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization: A Panel Discussion
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
1615-147X,
27
, pp.
302
313
.
10.
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
Clarke
,
S. M.
, and
Griebsch
,
J. H.
, 2005, “
Analysis of Support Vector Regression for Approximation of Complex Engineering Analyses
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
1050-0472,
127
, pp.
1077
1087
.
11.
Kim
,
H. S.
, and
Wierzbicki
,
T.
, 2000, “
Effect of the Cross-Sectional Shape on Crash Behavior of a 3-D Space Frame
,” Impact and Crashworthiness Laboratory Report No. 34, MIT.
You do not currently have access to this content.