This study presents a systematic decomposition process to carry out assembly synthesis as a tool during the conceptual design phase of a product. Two configurations obtained by structural topology optimization are decomposed automatically into assemblies consisting of multiple members with simpler geometries. Generating topology graphs for both products, the search for an optimal decomposition can then be posed as a graph partitioning problem. Considering the complexity and the corresponding computational overhead of the problem, a steady-state genetic algorithm is employed as the optimization method. The final objective function attempts to find a solution that brings about two structures with maximum structural strength, maximum assemblability, and one or more components that can be shared by both products. The software implementation is carried out and a bicycle frame design problem is solved using the procedure. It is observed that the algorithm manages to find an acceptable solution, allowing the commonality of one component in both end products and still maintaining a good structural strength and assemblability.

1.
Mantripragada
,
R.
, and
Whitney
,
D. E.
,
1998
, “
The Datum Flow Chain: A Systematic Approach to Assembly Design and Modeling
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
10
(
3
), pp.
150
165
.
2.
Saitou, K., and Yetis, A., 2000, “Decomposition-Based Assembly Synthesis of Structural Products: Preliminary Results,” Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands, April 18–21.
3.
Smith
,
R. P.
,
1998
, “
Teaching Design for Assembly Using Product Disassembly
,”
IEEE Trans. Educ.
,
41
(
1
), pp.
50
53
.
4.
Yetis, A., 2000, “Decomposition-based Assembly Synthesis of Structural Products,” Master’s thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor.
5.
Yetis
,
A.
, and
Saitou
,
K.
,
2002
, “
Decomposition-Based Assembly Synthesis Based on Structural Considerations
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
124
, pp.
593
601
.
6.
Chirehdast
,
M.
,
Gea
,
H.-C.
,
Kikuchi
,
N.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
,
1994
, “
Structural Configuration Examples of an Integrated Optimal Design Process
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
(
4
), pp.
997
1004
.
7.
Chirehdast, M., 1992, “An Integrated Optimization Environment for Structural Configuration Design,” PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
8.
Bendsoe
,
M.
, and
Kikuchi
,
N.
,
1988
, “
Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design using a Homegenization Method
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
71
, pp.
197
224
.
9.
Chapman
,
C. D.
,
Saitou
,
K.
, and
Jakiela
,
M. J.
,
1994
, “
Genetic Algorithms as an Approach to Configuration and Topology Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
, pp.
1005
1012
.
10.
Shea
,
K.
, and
Cagan
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Languages and Semantics of Grammatical Discrete Structures
,”
Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
,
13
, pp.
241
251
.
11.
Chang
,
K.-H.
, and
Tang
,
P.-S.
,
2001
, “
Integration of Design and Manufacturing for Structural Shape Optimization
,”
Adv. Eng. Software
,
32
(
7
), pp.
555
567
.
12.
Johanson
,
R.
,
Kikuchi
,
N.
, and
Papalambros
,
P.
, 1994, “Simultaneous Topology and Material Microstructure Design,”Advances in Structural Optimization, B. H. V. Topping and M. Papadrakakis (ed.), Civil-Comp Ltd., Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 143–149.
13.
Jiang
,
T.
, and
Chirehdast
,
M.
,
1997
, “
A Systems Approach to Structural Topology Optimization: Designing Optimal Connections
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
119
, pp.
40
47
.
14.
Chickermane
,
H.
, and
Gea
,
H. C.
,
1997
, “
Design of Multi-Component Structural Systems for Optimal Layout Topology and Joint Locations
,”
Eng. Comput.
,
13
, pp.
235
243
.
15.
Li
,
Q.
,
Steven
,
G. P.
, and
Xie
,
Y. M.
,
2001
, “
Evolutionary Structural Optimization for Connection Topology Design of Multi-Component Systems
,”
Engineering Computations
,
18
(
3/4
), pp.
460
479
.
16.
Eng
,
T.-H.
,
Ling
,
Z.-K.
,
Olson
,
W.
, and
McLean
,
C.
,
1999
, “
Feature-based Assembly Modeling and Sequence Generation
,”
Computers & Industrial Engineering
,
36
(
1
) , pp.
17
33
.
17.
van Holland
,
W.
, and
Bronsvoort
,
W. F.
,
2000
, “
Assembly Features in Modeling and Planning
,”
Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manufact.
,
16
(
4
), pp.
277
294
.
18.
Wang
,
C.-H.
, and
Bourne
,
D. A.
,
1997
, “
Design and Manufacturing of Sheet Metal Parts: Using Features to Aid Process Planning and Resolve Manufacturability Problems
,”
Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manufact.
,
13
(
3
), pp.
281
294
.
19.
Whitney
,
D. E.
,
Mantripragada
,
R.
,
Adams
,
J. D.
, and
Rhee
,
S. J.
,
1999
, “
Designing Assemblies
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
11
(
4
), pp.
228
253
.
20.
Senin
,
N.
,
Groppetti
,
R.
, and
Wallace
,
D. R.
,
2000
, “
Concurrent Assembly Planning with Genetic Algorithms
,”
International Journal of Product Design and Process Development
,
16
(
1
), pp.
65
72
.
21.
Lazzerini
,
B.
, and
Marcelloni
,
F.
,
2000
, “
A Genetic Algorithm for Generating Optimal Assembly Plans
,”
Artif. Intell. Eng.
,
14
(
4
), pp.
319
329
.
22.
Stake, R. B., 1999, “A Hierarchical Classification of the Reasons for Dividing Products into Modules-A Theoretical Analysis,” Licentiate thesis, Department of Manufacturing Systems, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.
23.
Ishii, K., 1998, “The Life-cycle of an Enterprise,” A. Molina, J. M. Sanchez, and A. Kusiak, eds., Handbook of Life-cycle Engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers & Chapman and Hall, London ISBN: 0-412812509.
24.
He
,
D.
,
Kusiak
,
A.
, and
Tseng
,
T. L.
,
1998
, “
Delayed Product Differentiation: A Design and Manufacturing Perspective
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
30
(
2
), pp.
105
113
.
25.
Conner, C. G., De Kroon, J. P., and Mistree, F., 1999, “A Product Variety Tradeoff Evaluation Method for a Family of Cordless Drill Transmissions,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DETC99/DAC-8625, Las Vegas, Nevada, September 12–15.
26.
Newcomb
,
P. J.
,
Bras
,
B. A.
, and
Rosen
,
D. W.
,
1998
, “
Implications of Modularity on Product Design for the Life Cycle
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
120
(
3
), pp.
483
490
.
27.
Kota
,
S.
,
Sethuraman
,
K.
, and
Miller
,
R.
,
2000
, “
A Metric for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
4
), pp.
403
410
.
28.
Yu
,
J. S.
,
Gonzalez-Zugasti
,
J. P.
, and
Otto
,
K. N.
,
1999
, “
Product Architecture Definition Based Upon Customer Demands
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
129
(
3
), pp.
329
335
.
29.
Nelson
,
S.
,
Parkinson
,
M. B.
, and
Papalambros
,
P. Y.
,
2001
, “
Multicriteria Optimization in Product Platform Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
123
(
2
), pp.
199
204
.
30.
Fujita, K., Sakaguchi, H., and Akagi, S., 1999, “Product Variety Deployment and Its Optimization under Modular Architecture and Module Commonalization,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DETC99/DFM-8923, Las Vegas, Nevada, September 12–15.
31.
van Vliet, J. W., van Luttervelt, C. A., and Kals, H. J. J., 1999, “State-of-the-art Report On Design for Manufacturing,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DETC99/DFM-8970, Las Vegas, Nevada, September 12–15.
32.
Yao
,
Z.
,
Bradley
,
H. D.
, and
Maropoulos
,
P. G.
,
1998
, “
An Aggregate Weld Product Model for the Early Design Stages
,”
Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
,
12
(
5
), pp.
447
461
.
33.
Hahn
,
O.
,
Gieske
,
D.
,
Klasfauseweh
,
U.
, and
Rohde
,
A.
,
1997
, “
Fatigue Resistance of Spot Welds under Multiaxial Loads
,”
Weld. World
,
37
(
5
), pp.
15
22
.
34.
Sigmund
,
O.
,
2001
, “
A 99 Line Topology Optimization Code Written in Matlab
,”
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
,
21
, pp.
120
127
.
35.
Garey, M. R., and Johnson, D. S., 1979, Computers and Intractability, A Guide to the Theory of NP-completeness, W. H. Freeman and Co. New York.
36.
Davis, L., 1991, Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, Van Nostrand, Reinhold, New York.
You do not currently have access to this content.