RedesignIT is a computer program that uses model-based reasoning to generate and evaluate proposals of redesign plans for engineered devices. These proposals describe how the design parameters could be changed to achieve a specified performance goal. Equally important, the program proposes complementary modifications that may be necessary to counteract the undesirable side effects of the primary changes. RedesignIT is intended for use during the first stages of a redesign project, when engineers need to make a quick, yet accurate assessment of the overall effects of a particular design change. The program uses qualitative device models, which allow it to compute redesign plans efficiently. With its ability to predict the collateral, and probably undesirable, effects of a design change, the program is well suited to aid product designers in deciding on the feasibility of introducing design changes to a product.

1.
Sembugamoorthy, V., and Chandrasekaran, B., 1986, “Functional Representation of Devices and Compilation of Diagnostic Problem-Solving Systems,” Janet L. Kolodner and Christopher K. Riesbeck, eds., Experience, Memory, and Reasoning, pp. 47–73. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
2.
Keller, Richard, M., Baudin, Catherine, Iwasaki, Yumi, Nayak, Pandurang, and Tanaka, Kazuo, 1989, Compiling Diagnostic Rules and Redesign Plans From a Structure/Behavior Device Model: The Details, Technical Report KSL 89-50, Stanford University, Knowledge Systems Laboratory.
3.
Kuipers, Benjamin, 1994, Qualitative Reasoning: Modeling and Simulation with Incomplete Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4.
Goel, Ashok, and Chandrasekaran, B., 1989, “Functional Representation of Designs and Redesign Problem Solving,” Proc. Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-89), pp. 1388–1394, Los Altos, CA, Morgan Kuaufmann Publishers.
5.
Otto
,
Kevin
, and
Wood
,
Kristin
, 1998, “Product Evolution: A Reverse Engineering and Redesign Methodology,” Res. Eng. Des., pp. 226–243.
6.
Vanderplaats, Garrett N., 1984, Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: with Applications. McGraw Hill.
7.
Goel
,
Ashok K.
, and
Stroulia
,
Eleni
,
1996
, “
Functional Device Models and Model-Based Diagnosis in Adaptive Design
,”
Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, and Manufacturing
,
10
, pp.
355
370
.
8.
Stahovich
,
Thomas F.
,
2000
, “
Learnit: An Instance-Based Approach to Learning and Reusing Design Strategies
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
3
), pp.
249
256
.
9.
Stahovich
,
Thomas F.
, and
Bal
,
Hrishikesh
,
2002
, “
An Inductive Approach to Learning and Reusing Design Strategies
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
13
(
2
), pp.
109
121
.
10.
Korf
,
R. E.
,
1985
, “
Depth-First Iterative Deepening: An Optimal Admissible Tree Search
,”
Artif. Intell.
,
27
(
1
), pp.
97
109
.
11.
Taylor, Charles Fayette, 1985, The Internal-Combustion Engine in Theory and Practice, 2nd Edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12.
Merrion, David F., 1994, Diesel Engine Design for the 1990s, The L. Ray Buckendale lecture series, Society of Automobile Engineers, Warrendale, PA, International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI.
13.
Williams
,
Brian C.
,
1984
, “
Qualitative Analysis of Mos Circuits
,”
Artif. Intell.
,
24
(
1–3
), pp.
281
346
.
14.
Shimomura, Yoshiki, Takeda, Hideaki, Yoshioka, Masaharu, Umeda, Yasushi, and Tomiyama, Tetsuo, 1995, “Representation of Design Object Based on the Functional Evolution Process Model,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Volume DE-Vol. 83, pp. 351–360.
You do not currently have access to this content.