The purpose of this study is to derive a linearized form of dynamic equations for constrained mechanical systems. The governing equations for constrained mechanical systems are generally expressed in terms of Differential-Algebraic Equations (DAEs). Conventional methods of linearization are based on the perturbation of the nonlinear DAE, where small amounts of perturbations are taken to guarantee linear characteristics of the equations. On the other hand, the proposed linearized dynamic equations are derived directly from a force equilibrium condition, not from the DAEs, with small motion assumption. This approach is straightforward and simple compared to conventional perturbation methods, and can be applicable to any constrained mechanical systems that undergo small displacement under external forces. The modeling procedure and formulation of linearized dynamic equations are demonstrated by the example of a vehicle suspension system, a typical constrained multibody system. The solution is validated by comparison with conventional nonlinear dynamic analysis and modal test results.

1.
Orlandea
,
N.
,
Chase
,
M. A.
, and
Calahan
,
D. A.
,
1977
, “
A Sparsity-Oriented Approach to the Dynamic Analysis and Design of Mechanical Systems—Parts I and II
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
99
, pp.
773
784
.
2.
Wehage
,
R. A.
, and
Haug
,
E. J.
,
1982
, “
Generalized Coordinate Partitioning for Dimension Reduction in Analysis of Constrained Dynamic System
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
104
, pp.
247
255
.
3.
Mani
,
N. K.
,
Haug
,
E. J.
, and
Atkinson
,
K. E.
,
1985
, “
Application of Singular Value Decomposition for Analysis of Mechanical System Dynamics
,”
ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
,
107
, pp.
82
87
.
4.
Bae
,
D.-S.
,
Hwang
,
R.-S.
, and
Haug
,
E. J.
,
1991
, “
A Recursive Formulation for Real-Time Dynamic Simulation of Mechanical Systems.
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
113
, pp.
158
166
.
5.
Franchi
,
C. G.
,
1995
, “
General Formulation in Rigid Multibody Dynamics
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
38
(
12
), pp.
1985
2016
.
6.
Gear, W. C., 1971, Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7.
Gear
,
W. C.
,
1971
, “
Simultaneous Numerical Solution of Differential-Algebraic Equations
,”
IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory
,
18
(
1
), pp.
89
95
.
8.
Brayton
,
R. K.
,
Gustavson
,
F. G.
, and
Hatchel
,
G. D.
,
1972
, “
A New Efficient Algorithm for Solving Differential-Algebraic Systems Using Implicit Backward Differentiation Formulas
,”
Proc. IEEE
,
60
(
1
), pp.
98
108
.
9.
Sohoni
,
V. N.
, and
Whilesell
,
J.
,
1986
, “
Automatic Linearization of Constrained Dynamical Models
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
108
, pp.
300
304
.
10.
Lin
,
T.-C.
, and
Yae
,
K. H.
,
1994
, “
Recursive Linearization of Multibody Dynamics and Application to Control Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
116
(
2
), pp.
445
451
.
11.
Vukibratovic
,
M.
, and
Nenad
,
K.
,
1982
, “
Computer-Oriented Method for Linearization of Dynamic Models of Active Spatial Mechanisms
,”
Mech. Mach. Theory
,
17
(
1
), pp.
21
32
.
12.
Balafoutis
,
C. A.
,
Mirsa
,
P. P.
, and
Patel
,
R. V.
,
1986
, “
Recursive Evaluation of Linearized Dynamic Robot Models
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
RA-2
(
4
), pp.
146
155
.
13.
Kang, J. S., Yun, J. R., Lee, J. M., and Tak, T. O., 1997 “Elastokinematic Analysis and Optimization of Suspension Compliance Characteristics,” SAE paper No. 970104.
14.
Nikravesh, P. E., 1988, Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
You do not currently have access to this content.