Robust design techniques are often applied to the design of manufacturing processes to determine the most robust operating points for a production system. However, such efforts have traditionally been focused on treating the output of each manufacturing operation in isolation. This approach ignores the fact that the sensitivity of each operation to input variation is a function of the operating point, which can only be changed in conjunction with the operating points of all other operations in that system. As such, applying robust design to each operation within a system individually does not guarantee lowest end-of-line variation. This is contrary to commonly held beliefs. What is needed instead is a method for conducting a system-wide parameter design where the operating points of each operation are optimized as a complete set to reduce final product variation. The logistics of such an integrated parameter design scheme become difficult or impossible on processes that may occur in different geographical locations. In this paper we outline the use of mathematical models to conduct system-wide parameter design. We demonstrate this technique on a model of a sheet stretch-forming manufacturing system. Through this example, we show that selecting operating points while considering the entire system results in a greater reduction in variation than Taguchi-style robust design conducted independently on each of the operations within the system.

1.
Phadke, M., 1989, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
2.
Box, G., and Draper, N. 1969, Evolutionary Operation: A Statistical Method for Process Improvement, New York, John Wiley and Sons.
3.
Montgomery, D. C., 1984, Design and Analysis of Experiments, New York, John Wiley and Sons.
4.
Suri, R., and Otto, K., 1998, “Concurrent Part and Process Design for Quality Improvement,” ASME Design Automation Conference, Atlanta, GA, DETC98/DFM-5727.
5.
Kazmer, D., and Barkan, P., et al., 1996, “Quantifying Design and Manufacturing Robustness Through Stochastic Optimization Techniques,” ASME Design Automation Conference, Irvine, CA.
6.
Hu
,
S.
,
1997
, “
Stream-of-Variation Theory for Automotive Body Assembly
,”
CIRP Ann.
,
46
, No.
1
, pp.
1
6
.
7.
Frey
,
D.
, and
Otto
,
K.
,
2000
, “
Evaluating Process Capability During the Design of Manufacturing Systems
,”
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
122
, No.
3
, pp.
513
519
.
8.
Frey
,
D.
, and
Otto
,
K.
, et al.
2001
, “
Manufacturing Block Diagrams and Optimal Adjustment Procedures
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
123
, No.
1
, pp.
119
127
.
9.
Suri, R., 1999, “An Integrated System Model for Reducing Variation in Manufacturing Systems,” Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
10.
Suri, R., and Otto, K., 1999, Process Capability to Guide Tolerancing in Manufacturing Systems. NAMRC XXVII, Berkeley, CA, NAMRI/SME, pp. 227–232.
11.
Chen
,
W.
, and
Allen
,
J.
, et al.
1996
, “
A Procedure for Robust Design: Minimizing Variations Caused by Noise Factors and Control Factors
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
118
, No.
4
, pp.
478
493
.
12.
Chinnam
,
R. B.
, and
Kolarik
,
W. J.
,
1997
, “
Neural Network-based Quality Controllers for Manufacturing Systems
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
35
, No.
9
, pp.
2601
2620
.
13.
Otto
,
K.
, and
Antonsson
,
E.
,
1993
, “
Tuning Parameters in Engineering Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
115
, pp.
14
19
.
14.
Sachs
,
E.
, and
Prueger
,
G.
, et al.
,
1992
, “
An Equipment Model for Polysilicon LPCVD
,”
IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf.
,
5
, No.
1
, pp.
3
13
.
15.
Soons, J., 1993, “Accuracy Analysis of Multi-Axis Machines,” Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
16.
Suri, R., and Otto, K., 1999, “Variation Modeling for a Sheet Stretch Forming Manufacturing System,” CIRP Ann., pp. 397–400.
17.
Guo
,
R.-S.
, and
Sachs
,
E.
,
1993
, “
Modeling, Optimization, and Control of Spatial Uniformity in Manufacturing Processes
,”
IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf.
,
6
, No.
1
, pp.
41
57
.
You do not currently have access to this content.