Notch hinges are flexural hinges used to make complex, precise mechanisms. They are typically modeled as single degree-of-freedom hinges with an associated joint stiffness. This is not adequate for all purposes. This paper computes the six degree-of-freedom stiffness properties of notch hinges using finite element methods. The results are parameterized in terms of meaningful design parameters.
Issue Section:
Technical Papers
1.
Paros, J., and Weisbord, L., 1965, “How to Design Flexure Hinges,” Mach. Des., Nov., pp. 151–156.
2.
Smith
, S.
, Chetwynd
, D.
, and Bowen
, D.
, 1987
, “The Design and Assessment of High Precision Monolithic Translation Mechanisms
,” J. Phys. E
, 20
, pp. 977
–983
.3.
Smith, S., and Chetwynd, D., 1992, Foundations of Ultraprecision Mechanism Design, Gordon and Breach, New York.
4.
Koster, M., 1998, Constructieprincipes voor het nauwkeurig bewegen en positioneren (second ed.), Twente University Press (in Dutch).
5.
Braak, L., 1999. personal communication.
6.
Fasse
, E.
, and Breedveld
, P.
, 1998
, “Modelling of Elastically Coupled Bodies: Part 1: General Theory and Geometric Potential Function Method
,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
, 120
, pp. 496
–500
.7.
Fasse
, E.
, and Breedveld
, P.
, 1998
, “Modelling of Elastically Coupled Bodies: Part II: Exponential and Generalized Coordinate Methods
,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
, 120
, pp. 501
–506
.8.
Zhang
, S.
, and Fasse
, E.
, 2000
, “Spatial Compliance Modeling Using a Quaternion-Based Potential Function Method
,” Multibody System Dynamics
, 4
, pp. 75
–101
.9.
Griffis
, M.
, and Duffy
, J.
, 1991
, “Kinestatic Control: A Novel Theory for Simultaneously Regulating Force and Displacement
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 113
, pp. 508
–515
.10.
Patterson
, T.
, and Lipkin
, H.
, 1993
, “Structure of Robot Compliance
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 115
, pp. 576
–580
.11.
Patterson
, T.
, and Lipkin
, H.
, 1993
, “A Classification of Robot Compliance
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 115
, pp. 581
–584
.12.
Huang
, S.
, and Schimmels
, J.
, 1998
, “Achieving an Arbitrary Spatial Stiffness With Springs Connected in Parallel
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 120
, pp. 520
–526
.13.
Huang
, S.
, and Schimmels
, J.
, 1998
, “The Bounds and Realization of Spatial Stiffness Achieved With Simple Springs Connected in Parallel.
” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
, 14
, pp. 466
–475
.14.
Zˇefran, M., and Kumar, V., 1997, “Affine Connections for the Cartesian Stiffness Matrix,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1376–1381.
15.
Zˇefran, M., and Kumar, V., 1999, “A Geometric Approach to the Study of the Cartesian Stiffness Matrix,” ASME J. Mech. Des., accepted for publication.
16.
Ciblak, N., 1998, “Analysis of Cartesian Stiffness and Compliance with Application,” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology.
17.
Ciblak, N., and Lipkin, H., 1996, “Centers of Stiffness, Compliance, and Elasticity in the Modelling of Robotic Systems,” in Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf., 26, pp. 185–195.
18.
Ciblak, N., and Lipkin, H., 1996, “Remote Center of Compliance Reconsidered,” in Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conf., Number 96-DETC-MECH-1167, CD-ROM.
19.
Loncˇaric´
, J.
, 1987
, “Normal Forms of Stiffness and Compliance Matrices
,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
, 3
, pp. 567
–572
.20.
Zhang, S., 1999, “Lumped-Parameter Modelling of Elastically Coupled Bodies: Derivation of Constitutive Equations and Determination of Stiffness Matrices,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Arizona.
Copyright © 2001
by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
