The ANSI Y14.5M Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing Standards have been used for many years by practitioners for size and form verification of manufactured parts. However, different parts may satisfy these tolerances and yet perform quite differently because of surface variations not specified in the standards. We present a statistically-based technique for the determination of the type of surface variation for cylindrical parts. This technique is based on a parametric-based part representation used for fitting. The method is illustrated with examples. [S1087-1357(00)00403-2]

1.
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1994, American National Standard Engineering Drawings & Related Documentation Practice, Dimensioning & Tolerancing, ANSI Y14.5M-1994, ASME, New York.
2.
Dowling
,
M. M.
,
Griffin
,
P. M.
,
Tsui
,
K. L.
, and
Zhou
,
C.
,
1995
, “
Comparison of the Orthogonal Least Squares and Minimum Enclosing Zone Methods for Form Error Estimation
,”
Manuf. Rev.
,
8
, pp.
120
138
.
3.
Griffin
,
P.
, and
Messimer
,
S.
,
1992
, “
Object Pose Determination from Range Data
,”
Comput. Ind. Eng.
,
22
, pp.
245
256
.
4.
Pentland
,
A. P.
,
1986
, “
Perceptual Organization and the Representation of Natural Forms
,”
Artif. Intel.
,
28
, pp.
293
331
.
5.
Solina
,
F.
, and
Bajcsy
,
R.
,
1990
, “
Recovery of Parametric Models from Range Images: The Case for Superquadrics with Global Deformations
,”
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.
,
12
, pp.
133
147
.
6.
Barr
,
A.
,
1981
, “
Superquadrics and Angle Preserving Transformations
,”
IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl.
,
1
, pp.
11
23
.
7.
Paul, R., 1981, Robot Manipulators, MIT Press, Massachusetts.
8.
Marquardt
,
D. W.
,
1963
, “
An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters
,”
SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Appl. Math.
,
11
,
431
441
.
9.
Murthy
,
T. S. R.
, and
Abdin
,
S. Z.
,
1980
, “
Minimum Zone Evaluation of Surfaces
,”
Int. J. Machine Tool Des. Res.
,
20
, pp.
123
136
.
10.
Dowling
,
M. M.
,
Griffin
,
P. M.
,
Tsui
,
K. L.
, and
Zhou
,
C.
,
1997
, “
Statistical Issues in Geometric Feature Inspection using Coordinate Measuring Machines
,”
Technometrics
,
39
, pp.
3
17
.
11.
Ba´rcenas, C., Griffin, P. M., and Heikes, R., 1999, “Statistical Comparison of Sampling and Fitting Procedures for Geometric Tolerance Verification,” Tech. Report 829, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
12.
Wilson, R. H., 1993, From Errors of Cylindrical Features for Specific Manufacturing Processes, Ph.D. thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, North Carolina State University at Charlotte.
13.
Ba´rcenas, C., and Griffin, P. M., “Geometric Tolerance Verification Using Superquadrics,” Tech. Report 830, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
14.
Phillips
,
S. D.
,
Eberhardt
,
K. R.
, and
Parry
,
B.
,
1997
, “
Guidelines for Expressing the Uncertainty of Measurement Results Containing Uncorrected Bias
,”
J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol.
,
102
, pp.
577
585
.
15.
Phillips
,
S. D.
,
Borchardt
,
B.
,
Estler
,
W. T.
, and
Buttress
,
J.
,
1998
, “
Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty of Small Circular Features Measured by Coordinate Measuring Machines
,”
Precis. Eng.
,
22
, pp.
87
97
.
16.
Srinivasan, V., and O’Conner, M. A., 1995, “Towards an ISO Standard for Statistical Tolerancing,” Proceedings of the 4th CIRP Seminar of Computer Aided Tolerancing, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 181–194.
You do not currently have access to this content.