Experiments were performed to characterize the performance of Schmidt–Boelter heat flux gauges in stagnation and shear convective air flows. The gauges were of a standard design (25.4 mm and 38 mm in diameter), using a copper heat sink with water cooling channels around the active sensing element. A simple model of the gauges using an internal thermal resistance between the sensor surface and the heat sink is used to interpret the results. The model predicts a nonlinear dependence of the gauge sensitivity as a function of the heat transfer coefficient. Experimental calibration systems were developed to simultaneously measure the heat flux gauge response relative to a secondary standard under the same flow and thermal conditions. The measured gauge sensitivities in the stagnation flow matched the model, and were used to estimate the value of the internal thermal resistance for each of the four gauges tested. For shear flow, the effect of the varying gauge surface temperature on the boundary layer was included. The results matched the model with a constant factor of 15–25% lower effective heat transfer coefficient. When the gauge was water cooled, the effect of the internal thermal resistance of the gauge was markedly different for the two flow conditions. In the stagnation flow, the internal resistance further decreased the apparent gauge sensitivity. Conversely, in shear flow, the resistance was effectively offset by the cooler heat sink of the gauge, and the resulting sensitivities were nearly the same as, or larger than, for radiation.

1.
Diller
,
T. E.
, 1993, “
Advances in Heat Flux Measurements
,”
Adv. Heat Transfer
0065-2717,
23
, pp.
279
368
.
2.
Kuo
,
C. H.
, and
Kulkarni
,
A. K.
, 1991, “
Analysis of Heat Flux Measurement by Circular Foil Gages in Mixed Convection/Radiation Environment
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
0022-1481,
113
, pp.
1037
1040
.
3.
Holmberg
,
D. G.
, and
Diller
,
T. E.
, 1995, “
High-Frequency Heat Flux Sensor Calibration and Modelling
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
127
, pp.
502
506
.
4.
Hager
,
J. M.
,
Terrell
,
J. P.
,
Sivertson
,
E.
, and
Diller
,
T. E.
, 1994, “
In-Situ Calibration of a Heat Flux Microsensor Using Surface Temperature Measurements
,”
Proceedings of the 40th International Instrumentation Symposium, ISA
, Research Triangle Park, NC, ISA Paper No. 94-1034, pp.
261
270
.
5.
Kidd
,
C. T.
, and
Nelson
,
C. G.
, 1995, “
How the Schmidt-Boelter Gage Really Works
,”
Proceedings of the 41st International Instrumentation Symposium, ISA
, Research Triangle Park, NC, pp.
347
368
.
6.
Murthy
,
A. V.
,
Fraser
,
G. T.
, and
De Witt
,
D. P.
, 2006, “
Experimental In-Cavity Radiative Calibration of High-Heat-Flux Meters
,”
J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer
0887-8722,
20
, pp.
327
335
.
7.
Hoffie
,
A.
, 2006, “
Convection Calibration of Schmidt-Boelter Heat Flux Gages in Shear and Stagnation Air Flows
,” MS thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
8.
Taylor
,
B. B.
, and
Kuyatt
,
C. E.
, 1994, “
Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results
,” NIST Technical Note 1297.
9.
Borell
,
G. J.
, and
Diller
,
T. E.
, 1987, “
A Convection Calibration Method for Local Heat Flux Gages
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
0022-1481,
109
, pp.
83
89
.
10.
Mukerji
,
D.
,
Eaton
,
J. K.
, and
Moffat
,
R. J.
, 2004, “
Convective Heat Transfer Near One-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Steps
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
0022-1481,
126
, pp.
202
210
.
You do not currently have access to this content.