Drag-reducing solutions exhibit simultaneous friction and heat transfer reductions, yet it has been widely believed that there is no direct coupling between the two. In this work, we have conducted a study to re-examine this issue, using measurements of friction and heat transfer over a wide range of flow conditions from onset to asymptotic, various pipe diameters, and several polymer and surfactant solutions. Contrary to some earlier suggestions, our tests show that no decoupling of the momentum and heat transfer mechanisms was seen at the onset of drag reduction, nor upon departure from the asymptotes, but rather that the friction and heat transfer reductions change simultaneously in those regions. For asymptotic surfactant and polymer solutions, the ratio of heat transfer and drag reductions was seen to be constant over a large range of Reynolds numbers, if modified definitions of the reduction parameters are used. In the nonasymptotic region, however, the ratio of heat transfer to drag reductions is higher and is a function of the reduction level, but is approximately the same for polymer and surfactant solutions. This variation is consistent with the concept of a direct coupling through a nonunity constant Prt, as also suggested by our local measurements of temperature and velocity profiles. We also saw that our diameter scaling technique for friction applies equally well to heat transfer. These findings allow us to predict directly the heat transfer from friction measurements or vice versa for these drag-reducing fluids, and also suggest that a strong coupling exists between the heat and momentum transfer mechanisms.

1.
Aguilar, G., 1995, “Study of the Diameter Effect and Scaling Procedures for Drag-Reducing Surfactant and Polymer Solutions,” M.Sc. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
2.
Aguilar, G., Gasljevic, K., and Matthys, E. F., 1998, “On the Relationship Between Heat Transfer and Drag Reductions for Polymer and Surfactant Solutions,” Heat Transfer in Flowing Systems, ASME, New York, pp. 139–146.
3.
Astarita
G.
,
Greco
G.
, and
Nicodemo
L.
,
1969
, “
A Phenomenological Interpretation and Correlation of Drag Reduction
,”
AIChE J.
, Vol.
14
, No.
4
, pp.
564
567
.
4.
Blasius, H., 1913, “Das Ahnlichkeitsgesetz bei Reibungsvorgangen in Flussigkeiten,” Forschg. Arb. Ing.-Wes., No. 134, Berlin.
5.
Cho
Y. I.
, and
Hartnett
J. P.
,
1982
, “
Non-Newtonian Fluids in Circular Pipe Flows
,”
Advances in Heat Transfer
, Vol.
15
, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp.
60
141
.
6.
Filomenko
G. K.
,
1954
,
Hydraulic Resistance in Pipes
, Vol.
1
, No.
4
, pp.
40
44
.
7.
Gasljevic, K., 1990, “Design and Construction of an Experimental Installation for the Investigation of Heat Transfer and Drag Reductions in Turbulent Flow of Viscoelastic Fluids,” M.Sc. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
8.
Gasljevic
K.
,
Aguilar
G.
, and
Matthys
E. F.
,
1999
, “
An Improved Diameter Scaling Correlation for Turbulent Flow of Drag-Reducing Polymer Solutions
,”
J. of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics
, Vol.
84
, No.
3
, pp.
131
148
.
9.
Gasljevic
K.
, and
Matthys
E. F.
,
1997
, “
Experimental Investigation of Thermal and Hydrodynamic Development Regions for Drag-Reducing Surfactant Solutions
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER
, Vol.
119
, pp.
80
88
.
10.
Gasljevic
K.
, and
Matthys
E. F.
,
1999
, “
Improved Quantification of the Drag Reduction Phenomenon Through Turbulence Reduction Parameters
,”
J. of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics
, Vol.
84
, No.
3
, pp.
123
130
.
11.
Kale
D. D.
,
1997
, “
An Analysis of Heat Transfer to Turbulent Flow of Drag-Reducing Fluids
,”
Int. J. of Heat and Mass Transfer
, Vol.
20
, pp.
1077
1081
.
12.
Kays, W. M., 1966, Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York.
13.
Kwack
E. Y.
,
Hartnett
J. P.
, and
Cho
Y. I.
,
1982
, “
Turbulent Heat Transfer in Circular Tube Flows of Viscoelastic Fluids
,”
Warme und-Stoffubertragung
, Vol.
16
, pp.
34
55
.
14.
Matthys
E. F.
,
1991
, “
Heat Transfer, Drag Reduction, and Fluid Characterization for Turbulent Flow in Polymer Solutions; Recent Resluts and Research Needs
,”
J. of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics
, Vol.
38
, pp.
313
342
.
15.
Mizushina
T.
, and
Usui
H.
,
1997
, “
Reduction of Eddy Diffusion for Momentum and Heat in Viscoelastic Fluid Flow in a Circular Tube
,”
Phys. Fluids
, Vol.
20
, pp.
S100–S108
S100–S108
.
16.
Mizushina
T.
,
Usui
H.
, and
Yamamoto
T.
,
1975
, “
Turbulent Heat Transfer of Viscoelastic Fluid Flow in Pipes
,”
Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer
, Vol.
2
, pp.
19
26
.
17.
Ng, K. S., Cho, Y. I., and Hartnett, J. P., 1980, “Heat Transfer Performance of Concentrated Polyethylene Oxide and Polyacrylamide Solutions,” AIChE Symposium Series (19th National Heat Transfer Conference), Vol. 76, No. 199, pp. 250–256.
18.
Ng, K. S., and Hartnett, J. P., 1979, “Effects of Mechanical Degradation on Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer Performance of Polyacrylamide Solutions in Turbulent Pipe Flow,” Studies in Heat Transfer, T. F. Irvine, Jr., et al., eds., McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 297–307.
19.
Petukov
B. S.
,
1970
, “
Heat Transfer and Friction in Turbulent Pipe Flow With Variable Physical Properties
,”
Advances in Heat Transfer
, Vol.
6
, pp.
503
564
.
20.
Poreh
M.
, and
Paz
U.
,
1968
, “
Turbulent Heat Transfer to Dilute Polymer Solutions
,”
Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer
, Vol.
11
, pp.
805
810
.
21.
Roethig, T. R., and Matthys, E. F., 1988, “Eddy Diffusivities for Non-Isothermal Tube Flow of Drag-Reducing Polymer Solutions,” Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Rheology, Vol. 2, P. Uhlherr, ed., ASR, Sydney, Australia, pp. 227–229.
22.
Schmitt, K., Brunn, P. O., and Durst, F., 1988, “Scaling-Up Correlations for Drag Reducing Surfactants,” Progress and Trends in Rheology II, pp. 249–252.
23.
Sleicher
C. A.
, and
Rouse
M. W.
,
1975
, “
A Convenient Correlation for Heat Transfer to Constant and Variable Property Fluids in Turbulent Pipe Flow
,”
Int. J. of Heat and Mass Transfer
, Vol.
18
, pp.
677
683
.
24.
Smith
R.
, and
Edwards
M.
,
1981
, “
Heat Transfer to non-Newtonian and Drag-Reducing Fluids in Turbulent Pipe Flow
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
, Vol.
24
, pp.
1059
1069
.
25.
Toh
K. H.
, and
Ghajar
A. J.
,
1998
, “
Heat Transfer in the Thermal Entrance Region for Viscoelastic Fluids in Turbulent Pipe Flow
,”
Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer
, Vol.
31
, No.
6
, pp.
1261
1267
.
26.
Yoon, H. K., and Ghajar, A. J., 1987, “A Heat Transfer Correlation for Viscoelastic Turbulent Pipe Flows Under Constant Wall Heat Flux,” Proceedings of the 1987 ASME/AIChE National Heat Transfer Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, Aug. 9-12, ASME New York, pp. 1–7.
27.
Zakin
J. L.
,
Myska
J.
, and
Chara
Z.
,
1996
, “
New Limiting Drag Reduction and Velocity Profile Asymptotes for Non-polymeric Additives Systems
,”
AIChE Journal
, Vol.
42
, No.
12
, pp.
3544
3546
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.