An inverse Boundary Element Method (BEM) procedure has been used to determine unknown heat transfer coefficients on surfaces of arbitrarily shaped solids. The procedure is noniterative and cost effective, involving only a simple modification to any existing steady-state heat conduction BEM algorithm. Its main advantage is that this method does not require any knowledge of, or solution to, the fluid flow field. Thermal boundary conditions can be prescribed on only part of the boundary of the solid object, while the heat transfer coefficients on boundaries exposed to a moving fluid can be partially or entirely unknown. Over-specified boundary conditions or internal temperature measurements on other, more accessible boundaries are required in order to compensate for the unknown conditions. An ill-conditioned matrix results from the inverse BEM formulation, which must be properly inverted to obtain the solution to the ill-posed problem. Accuracy of numerical results has been demonstrated for several steady two-dimensional heat conduction problems including sensitivity of the algorithm to errors in the measurement data of surface temperatures and heat fluxes.

Issue Section:
Conduction Heat Transfer
Keywords:
Conduction, Conjugate Heat Transfer, Mixed Convection
Topics:
Algorithms, Boundary element methods, Boundary-value problems, Convection, Errors, Fluid dynamics, Fluids, Flux (Metallurgy), Heat, Heat conduction, Heat transfer, Heat transfer coefficients, Mixed convection, Solids, Steady state, Temperature, Temperature measurement
1.
Brebbia, C. A., and Dominguez, J., 1989, Boundary Elements, An Introductory Course, McGraw-Hill, New York.
2.
Dulikravich, G. S., and Martin, T. J., 1996, “Inverse Shape and Boundary Condition Problems and Optimization in Heat Conduction,” Advances in Numerical Heat Transfer, W. J. Minkowycz and E. M. Sparrow, eds., Taylor & Francis, Chap. 10, pp. 324–367.
3.
Martin
T. J.
,
Halderman
J.
, and
Dulikravich
G. S.
,
1994
, “
An Inverse Method for Finding Unknown Surface Tractions and Deformations in Elastostatics
,”
Computers and Structures
, Vol.
56
, No.
5
, pp.
825
–
836
.
4.
Martin
T. J.
, and
Dulikravich
G. S.
,
1996
, “
Inverse Determination of Boundary Conditions in Steady Heat Conduction With Heat Generation
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER
, Vol.
118
, pp.
546
–
554
.
5.
Martin, T. J., and Dulikravich, G. S., 1997, “Non-iterative Determination of Temperature-Dependent Thermal Conductivity,” Symposium on Inverse Design Problems in Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, G. S. Dulikravich and K. A. Woodbury, eds., ASME HTD-Vol. 340, Vol. 2, pp. 151–158.
6.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P., 1986, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN, The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7.
Tikhonov, A. N., and Arsenin, V. Y., 1977, Solutions of Ill Posed Problems, Halsted Press, V. H. Winston & Sons, Washington, DC.
8.
White, F. M., 1988, Heat and Mass Transfer, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, p. 272.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.