Abstract

Steam turbines are among the most important systems in commercial and industrial power conversion. As the amount of renewable energies increases, power plants formerly operated at steady-state base load are now experiencing increased times at part load conditions. Besides other methods, the use of control valves is a widely spread method for controlling the power output of a steam turbine. In difference to other throttling approaches, the control valve enables fast load gradients as the boiler can be operated at constant conditions and allows a quicker response on variable power requirements. At part load, a significant amount of energy is dissipated across the valve, as the total inlet pressure of the turbine is decreased across the valve. At these conditions, the flow through the valve becomes trans- and supersonic and large pressure fluctuations appear within the downstream part of the valve. As a result, unsteady forces are acting on the valve structure and vibrations can be triggered, leading to mechanical stresses and possible failures of the valve. Besides more complex valve geometries, a spherical valve shape is still often used in smaller and industrial steam turbines. Because of the smooth head contour, the flow is prone to remain attached to the head surface and interact with the flow coming from the opposite side. This behavior is accompanied by flow instabilities and large pressure fluctuations, leading to unsteady forces and possible couplings with mechanical frequencies. The spherical valve shape was therefore chosen as the experimental test geometry for the investigation of the unsteady flow field and fluid–structure interactions within a scaled steam turbine control valve. Using numerical methods, the test valve is investigated and the time dependent pressure distribution in the downstream diffuser is evaluated. The evolution of the flow stability will be discussed for different pressure ratios (PRs). Pressure signals retrieved from the control valve test rig will be used to compare the numerical results with the experimental data.

References

1.
Hardin
,
J.
,
Kushner
,
F.
, and
Koester
,
S.
,
2003
, “
Elimination of Flow-Induced Instability From Steam Turbine Control Valves
,”
Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Turbomachinery Symposium
, Houston, TX, Sept. 8–11, pp.
99
108
.10.21423/R1N94S
2.
Ziada
,
S.
,
Bühlmann
,
E.
, and
Bolleter
,
U.
,
1989
, “
Flow Impingement as an Excitation Source in Control Valves
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
3
(
5
), pp.
529
549
.10.1016/S0889-9746(89)80029-5
3.
Zhang
,
D.
, and
Engeda
,
A.
,
2003
, “
Venturi Valves for Steam Turbines and Improved Design Considerations
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. A
,
217
(
2
), pp.
219
230
.10.1243/09576500360611254
4.
Clari
,
M. B.
,
Polklas
,
T.
, and
Joos
,
F.
,
2011
, “
Three-Dimensional Flow Separations in the Diffuser of a Steam Turbine Control Valve
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011-45617.10.1115/GT2011-45617
5.
Domnick
,
C. B.
,
Benra
,
F.-K.
,
Dohmen
,
H. J.
, and
Musch
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Numerical Investigation on the Time-Variant Flow Field and Dynamic Forces Acting in Steam Turbine Inlet Valves
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25632.10.1115/GT2014-25632
6.
Schramm
,
A.
,
Müller
,
T.
,
Polklas
,
T.
,
Brunn
,
O.
, and
Mailach
,
R.
,
2014
, “
Unsteady Flow in Extraction Modules of Industrial Steam Turbines
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25394.10.1115/GT2014-25394
7.
Zhang
,
D.
,
Engeda
,
A.
,
Hardin
,
J. R.
, and
Aungier
,
R. H.
,
2004
, “
Experimental Study of Steam Turbine Control Valves
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C
,
218
(
5
), pp.
493
507
.10.1243/095440604323052283
8.
Morita
,
R.
,
Inada
,
F.
,
Mori
,
M.
,
Tezuka
,
K.
, and
Tsujimoto
,
Y.
,
2004
, “
CFD Calculation and Experiments of Unsteady Flow on Control Valve
,”
ASME
Paper No. HT-FED2004-56017.10.1115/HT-FED2004-56017
9.
Yonezawa
,
K.
,
Ogi
,
K.
,
Takino
,
T.
,
Tsujimoto
,
Y.
,
Endo
,
T.
,
Tezuka
,
K.
,
Morita
,
R.
, and
Inada
,
F.
,
2010
, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Flow Induced Vibration of Steam Control Valve
,”
ASME
Paper No. FEDSM-ICNMM2010-30676.10.1115/FEDSM-ICNMM2010-30676
10.
Zanazzi
,
G.
,
Schaefer
,
O.
,
Sell
,
M.
, and
Ridoutt
,
C.
,
2013
, “
Unsteady CFD Simulation of Control Valve in Throttling Conditions and Comparison With Experiments
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94788.10.1115/GT2013-94788
11.
Domnick
,
C. B.
,
Benra
,
F.-K.
,
Brillert
,
D.
,
Dohmen
,
H. J.
, and
Musch
,
C.
,
2015
, “
Improving the Design of Steam Turbine Inlet Valves by Numerical Methods for Enhanced Part Load Operation
,” Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, Madrid, Spain, Mar. 23–27, Paper No.
ETC2015-107
.https://www.euroturbo.eu/publications/proceedings-papers/etc2015-107/
12.
Domnick
,
C. B.
,
Benra
,
F.-K.
,
Brillert
,
D.
,
Dohmen
,
H. J.
, and
Musch
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Investigation on Flow Induced Vibrations of a Steam Turbine Inlet Valve Considering Fluid Structure Interaction Effects
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56314.10.1115/GT2016-56314
13.
Windemuth
,
C.
,
Lange
,
M.
, and
Mailach
,
R.
,
2019
, “
Introduction of a Novel Test Rig for the Investigation of Fluid-Structure Interaction Effects in Steam Turbine Control Valves Using an Elastic Model
,” 13th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics, Lausanne, Switzerland, Apr. 8–12, Paper No.
ETC2019-006
.10.29008/ETC2019-006
14.
Domnick
,
C. B.
,
2017
, “
Untersuchung des Strömungs- und Strukturdynamischen Verhaltens von Dampfturbineneinlassventilen im Teillastbetrieb
,” Doctoral thesis,
Universität Duisburg-Essen
,
Duisburg, Germany
.
15.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
2015
, “
Best Practice: Scale-Resolving Simulations in ANSYS CFD
, Version 2.00,” ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA.
You do not currently have access to this content.