A new-generation common feeding (CF) fuel injection system without rail has been compared with the standard common rail (CR) apparatus for diesel engine passenger cars. The high-pressure pump in the CF apparatus is connected directly to the injectors, and a volume of about 2.5 cm3 is integrated at the pump delivery. Experimental tests on solenoid injectors have been carried out for the CF and CR apparatus at a hydraulic test rig. The dependence of the injected volumes and total injector leakages on the energizing time (ET) of the two systems has been investigated for different rail pressure levels. Furthermore, the measured injected flow-rates of the CF and CR systems have been compared for single and pilot–main injection events. In general, the injection performance of the two systems is very similar, even though the differences occur in the high-pressure transients. The dynamics of the pressure waves changes because the high-pressure hydraulic layouts of the two systems are different, and the propagation and reflection of the rarefaction waves, triggered by the injection events, occur in different ways. A previously developed one-dimensional (1D) code for the CF high-pressure layout has been further validated by means of a comparison with the experimental data. The effects of either a calibrated orifice installed at the pump delivery or an injector-integrated Minirail on the CF performance have been investigated by means of the model. Numerical parametrical tests have also been conducted on the pump-to-injector pipe length. The additional orifices that can be installed in the high-pressure circuit of the CF are effective, provided their diameter is smaller than the diameter of any other orifice inserted in the injector. Furthermore, the presence of a Minirail within the injector has an impact on the injected flow-rates of small injections, such as pilot, pre, after, and post, and also induces a reduction in the energy stored in the pressure waves. Another relevant active damping strategy of the pressure waves for the CF involves shortening the pump-to-injector pipe as much as possible. Finally, the fluid dynamical transients within the solenoid injector have been discussed for the CF and CR systems. The numerical time distributions of the main variables within the injector are shown to be independent of the presence of the rail in the layout.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2016
Research-Article
Hydraulic Performance Comparison Between the Newly Designed Common Feeding and Standard Common Rail Injection Systems for Diesel Engines
A. Ferrari,
A. Ferrari
Department of Energy,
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
F. Paolicelli,
F. Paolicelli
Department of Energy,
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
P. Pizzo
P. Pizzo
Department of Energy,
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Ferrari
Department of Energy,
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
F. Paolicelli
Department of Energy,
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
P. Pizzo
Department of Energy,
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
Politecnico di Torino,
Turin 10129, Italy
Contributed by the IC Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 28, 2015; final manuscript received December 14, 2015; published online March 22, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Timothy J. Jacobs.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Sep 2016, 138(9): 092801 (13 pages)
Published Online: March 22, 2016
Article history
Received:
July 28, 2015
Revised:
December 14, 2015
Citation
Ferrari, A., Paolicelli, F., and Pizzo, P. (March 22, 2016). "Hydraulic Performance Comparison Between the Newly Designed Common Feeding and Standard Common Rail Injection Systems for Diesel Engines." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. September 2016; 138(9): 092801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032644
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Image-based flashback detection in a hydrogen-fired gas turbine using a convolutional autoencoder
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Fuel Thermal Management and Injector Part Design for LPBF Manufacturing
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
An investigation of a multi-injector, premix/micromix burner burning pure methane to pure hydrogen
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
Development and Application of a Complete Multijet Common-Rail Injection-System Mathematical Model for Hydrodynamic Analysis and Diagnostics
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (November,2008)
The Development of a Dual-Injection Hydrogen-Fueled Engine With High Power and High Efficiency
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2006)
Numerical-Experimental Study and Solutions to Reduce the Dwell-Time Threshold for Fusion-Free Consecutive Injections in a Multijet Solenoid-Type CR System
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (March,2009)
Numerical Analysis and Experimental Investigation of a Common Rail-Type Diesel Injector
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (October,2004)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction I: Role of Engineering Science
Fundamentals of heat Engines: Reciprocating and Gas Turbine Internal Combustion Engines
Dynamic Behavior of Pumping Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach
Section III: Subsections NC and ND — Class 2 and 3 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Third Edition