This paper presents a computationally efficient methodology for generating training data for a transient neural network model of a tip-jet reaction drive system for potential use as an onboard model in a model based control application. This methodology significantly reduces the number of training points required to capture the transient performance of the system. The challenge in developing an onboard model for a tip-jet reaction drive system is that the model has to operate over the whole flight envelope, to account for the different dynamics present in the system, and to adjust to system degradation or potential faults. In addition, the onboard model must execute in less time than the update interval of the controller. To address these issues, a computationally efficient training methodology and neural network surrogate model have been developed that captures the transient performance of the tip-jet reaction system. As the number of inputs to a neural network becomes large, the computational time needed to generate the number of training points required to accurately represent the range of operating conditions of the system may become quite large also. A challenge for the tip-jet reaction drive system is to minimize the number of neural network training points, while maintaining the high accuracy. To address this issue, a novel training methodology is presented which first trains a steady-state neural network model and uses deviations from steady-state operating conditions to define the transient portion of the training data. The combined results from both the transient and the steady-state training data can then be used to create a single transient neural network of the system. The results in this paper demonstrate that a transient neural network using this new computationally efficient training methodology has the potential to be a feasible option for use as an onboard real-time model for model based control of a tip-jet reaction drive system.

References

1.
Skogestad
,
S.
and
Postlethwaite
,
I.
, 2005,
Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
2.
Kobayashi
,
T.
,
Simon
,
D. L.
, and
Litt
,
J. S.
, 2005, “
Application of Constant Gain Extended Kalman Filter for In-Flight Estimation of Aircraft Engine Performance
,” Report No. NASA/TM-2005-213865.
3.
Arulampalam
,
M. S.
,
Maskell
,
S.
,
Gordon
,
S.
, and
Clapp
,
T.
, 2002, “
A Tutorial on Particle Filters for Online Nonlinear/Non-Gaussian Bayesian Tracking
,”
IEEE Trans. Signal Process.
,
50
(
2
), pp.
174
188
.
4.
Adibhatla
,
S.
, and
Gastineau
,
Z.
, 1994, “
Tracking Filter Selection and Control Model Selection for Model Based Control
,”
30th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference
,
Indianapolis, IN
.
5.
Volponi
,
A.
, 2008, “
Enhanced Self Tuning On-Board Real-Time Model (eSTORM) for Aircraft Engine Performance Health Tracking
,” Report No. NASA/CR-2008-215272.
6.
Jaw
,
L.
, and
Garg
,
S.
, 2005, “
Propulsion Control Technology Development in the United States: A Historical Perspective
,” Report No. NASA/TM-20050213978.
7.
Fuller
,
J.
,
Seto
,
D.
, and
Meisner
,
R.
, 2000, “
Optimization-Based Control for Flight Vehicles
” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Denver, CO, Report No. AIAA 2000-4055.
8.
Ballin
,
M. G.
, 1988, “
A High Fidelity Real-Time Simulation of a Small Turboshaft Engine
,” Report No. NASA/TM-1988-100991.
9.
Szuch
,
J. R.
, and
Seldner
,
K.
, 1975, “
Real-Time Simulation of F100-PW-100 Turbofan Engine Using the Hybrid Computer
,” Report No. NASA TM X-3261.
10.
French
,
M. W.
, 1982, “
Development of a Compact Real-Time Turbofan Engine Dynamic Simulation
,” SAE Paper No. 821401.
11.
Luppold
,
R. H.
,
Roman
,
J. R.
,
Gallops
,
G. W.
, and
Kerr
,
L. J.
, 1989, “
Estimating In-Flight Engine Performance Variations Using Kalman Filter Concepts
,”
AIAA/ASME SAE/ASEE 25th Joint Propulsion Conference
,
Monterey, CA
, pp.
1
8
.
12.
Mihaloew
,
J. R.
,
Roth
,
S. P
, and
Creekmore
,
R.
, 1984, “
Real-Time Pegasus Propulsion System Model V/STOL-Piloted Simulation Evaluation
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn
.,
7
, pp.
45
52
.
13.
Shaoji
,
J.
, 1992, “
A Simplified Real-Time Engine Model For Developing Aeroengine Control System
,”
AIAA Conference
,
Nashville TN
, Report No. AIAA 1992-3321.
14.
Lichtsinder
,
M.
, and
Levy
,
Y.
, 2006, “
Jet Engine Model for Control and Real-Time Simulations
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
128
, pp.
745
753
.
15.
Chiras
,
N.
,
Evans
,
C.
, and
Rees
,
D.
, 2002, “
Nonlinear Gas Turbine Modeling Using Feedforward Neural Networks
,” ASME Paper No. GT2002–20035.
16.
Venturini
,
M.
, 2006, “
Simulation of Compressor Transient Behavior Through Recurrent Neural Network Models
,”
ASME J. Turbomach
.,
128
, pp.
444
454
.
17.
Sanghi
,
V.
,
Lakshmanan
,
B. K.
, and
Sundararajan
,
V.
, 2000, “
Survey of Advancements in Jet-Engine Thermodynamic Simulation
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
16
(
5
), pp.
797
807
.
18.
SAE
, 2001, “
Real-Time Modeling Methods for Gas Turbine Engine Performance
,” Tech. Report No. AIR 4548A.
19.
Rao
,
M. A.
, and
Srinivas
,
J.
, 2003, “
Neural Networks Algorithms and Applications
,” Alpha Science International Ltd.
20.
Talbot
,
P. D.
1991, “
High Speed Rotorcraft: Comparison of Leading Concepts and Technology Needs
,”
47th Annual Forum of the American Helicoptor Society
,
Phoenix, AZ
, pp.
1187
1212
.
21.
Mitchell
,
C. A.
, and
Vogel
,
B. J.
2003, “
The Canard Rotor Wing (CRW) Aircraft – A New Way to Fly
,”
AIAA International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: The Next 100 Years
,
Dayton, OH
, Paper No. AIAA 2003-2517.
22.
Mavris
,
D. N.
,
Tai
,
J.
, and
Schrage
,
D. P.
, 1994, “
A Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Approach to Sizing Stopped Rotor Configurations Utilizing Reaction Drive and Circulation Control
,” Paper No. AIAA-94-4296.
23.
MATLAB, 2008, Version 7.6.0.324 (R2008a), MathWorks, Natick, MA.
24.
BRAINN
, 2008, “
Basic Regression Analysis for Integrated Neural Networks
,” Version 2.2, ASDL, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
25.
Kong
,
C.
,
Park
,
J.
, and
Kang
,
M.
, 2006, “
A Study on Transient Performance Characteristics of the Canard Rotor Wing Type Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Propulsion System During Flight Mode Transition
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
128
, pp.
573
578
.
26.
Tai
,
J. C. M.
1998, “
A Multidisciplinary Design Approach to Size Stopped Rotor/Wing Configurations Using Reaction Drive and Circulation Control
,” Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
27.
Kestner
,
B.
,
Tai
,
J. C. M.
, and
Mavris
,
D. N.
, 2009, “
Multivariable PI Control for Tip-Jet Reaction Drive Systems
,” 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO, Paper No. AIAA 2009-4808.
28.
Park
,
J.
, 1994, “
Optimal Latin-Hypercube Designs for Computer Experiments
,”
J. Statist. Plann. Inference
,
39
,
95
111
.
29.
Brown
,
H.
, and
Elgin
,
J. A.
, 1985, “
Aircraft Engine Control Mode Analysis
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
, pp.
838
844
.
You do not currently have access to this content.