Peak power of an engine is typically constrained by the maximum obtainable airflow. This constraint could arise directly from the airflow limitation imposed by the throttle restriction (typical for a naturally aspirated engine), or indirectly from other factors, such as various temperature limits for component protection. In this work, we evaluate the airflow limit for a turbocharged gasoline engine as dictated by the constraints on the turbine inlet temperature. Increasing the limit on the turbine inlet temperature requires the exhaust manifolds and turbine to be made out of more expensive materials that withstand higher temperatures. This expense is justifiable if operating with higher turbine inlet temperature allows noticeably higher power output, and not merely increases the allowable airflow. Experimental data show that under some conditions the increase in airflow does not increase the peak power. The effects of increasing airflow on the peak power and turbine inlet temperatures are systematically analyzed through individual accounting for the different losses affecting the engine torque. The breakdown analysis presented in this work indicates combustion phasing as a major contributing factor to whether increasing the flange temperature limit would increase the peak power.

1.
Lake
,
T.
,
Murphy
,
R.
,
Osborne
,
R.
,
Russell
,
J.
, and
Schamel
,
A.
, 2004, “
Turbocharging Concepts for Downsized DI Gasoline Engines
,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0036.
2.
Ichikawa
,
H.
,
Nakada
,
N.
, and
Yajima
,
J.
, 2009 “
The New High-Performance V6 Gasoline Turbocharged Engine From NISSAN
,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1067.
3.
Luttermann
,
C.
, and
Mährle
,
W.
, 2007, “
BMW High Precision Fuel Injection in Conjunction With Twin-Turbo Technology: A Combination for Maximum Dynamic and High Fuel Efficiency
,” SAE Paper No. 2007-01-1560.
4.
Fraser
,
N.
,
Blaxill
,
H.
,
Lumsden
,
G.
, and
Bassett
,
M.
, 2009, “
Challenges for Increased Efficiency Through Gasoline Engine Downsizing
,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1053.
5.
Yi
,
J.
,
Wooldridge
,
S.
,
Coulson
,
G.
,
Hilditch
,
J.
,
Iyer
,
C.
,
Moilanen
,
P.
,
Papaioannou
,
G.
,
Reiche
,
D.
,
Shelby
,
M.
,
VanDerWege
,
B.
,
Weaver
,
C.
,
Xu
,
Z.
,
Davis
,
G.
,
Hinds
,
B.
, and
Schamel
,
A.
, 2009, “
Development and Optimization of the Ford 3.5 L V6 EcoBoost Combustion System
,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1494.
6.
Zaccardi
,
J.
,
Pagot
,
A.
,
Vangraefschepe
,
F.
,
Dognin
,
C.
, and
Mokhtari
,
S.
, 2009, “
Optimal Design for a Highly Downsized Gasoline Engine
,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1794.
7.
Heywood
,
J.
, 1988,
Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
8.
Tetsui
,
T.
, 2002, “
Development of a TiAl Turbocharger for Passenger Vehicles
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
0921-5093,
329–331
, pp.
582
588
.
9.
Kenji
,
I.
,
Keijiro
,
H.
, and
Tomomi
,
S.
, 2006, “
Development of HERCUNITE-S NSHR-A5N for High Performance Gasoline Engines
,”
Hitachi Rev.
0018-277X,
22
, pp.
51
56
.
10.
Ayala
,
F.
,
Gerty
,
M.
, and
Heywood
,
J.
, 2006, “
Effects of Combustion Phasing, Relative Air Fuel Ratio, Compression Ratio, and Load on SI Engine Efficiency
,” SAE Paper No. 2006-01-0229.
11.
Stein
,
R.
, and
Mencik
,
D.
, 1982, “
Analysis Methodology for WOT Engine Dynamometer Data for Naturally Aspirated Four Stroke Engines
,” Ford Internal Report No. SRM-82-023.
12.
Taylor
,
C.
, 1985,
The Internal-Combustion Engine in Theory and Practice
,
MIT
,
Cambridge, MA
, Vol.
II
.
13.
Pipitone
,
E.
, 2008, “
A Comparison Between Combustion Phase Indicators for Optimal Spark Timing
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
130
(
5
), p.
052808
.
You do not currently have access to this content.