Kalman filters are often used to estimate the state variables of a dynamic system. However, in the application of Kalman filters some known signal information is often either ignored or dealt with heuristically. For instance, state-variable constraints (which may be based on physical considerations) are often neglected because they do not fit easily into the structure of the Kalman filter. This paper develops an analytic method of incorporating state-variable inequality constraints in the Kalman filter. The resultant filter is a combination of a standard Kalman filter and a quadratic programming problem. The incorporation of state-variable constraints increases the computational effort of the filter but significantly improves its estimation accuracy. The improvement is proven theoretically and shown via simulation results obtained from application to a turbofan engine model. This model contains 16 state variables, 12 measurements, and 8 component health parameters. It is shown that the new algorithms provide improved performance in this example over unconstrained Kalman filtering.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation
Keywords:
aerospace engines, Kalman filters, quadratic programming, aerospace computing, state estimation, parameter estimation
Topics:
Engines, Filters, Filtration, Kalman filters, Theorems (Mathematics), Turbofans, Quadratic programming, Simulation results
1.
Massicotte
,
D.
,
Morawski
,
R.
, and
Barwicz
,
A.
,
1995
, “
Incorporation of a Positivity Constraint Into a Kalman-Filter-Based Algorithm for Correction of Spectrometric Data
,”
IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.
,
44
, pp.
2
–
7
.
2.
Simon
,
D.
, and
Chia
,
T.
,
2002
, “
Kalman Filtering With State Equality Constraints
,”
IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.
,
39
, pp.
128
–
136
.
3.
Doel
,
D.
,
1994
, “
TEMPER—A Gas-Path Analysis Tool for Commercial Jet Engines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
116
, pp.
82
–
89
.
4.
Doel
,
D.
,
1994
, “
An Assessment of Weighted-Least-Squares-Based Gas Path Analysis
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
116
, pp.
366
–
373
.
5.
DePold
,
H.
, and
Gass
,
F.
,
1999
, “
The Application of Expert Systems and Neural Networks to Gas Turbine Prognostics and Diagnostics
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
, pp.
607
–
612
.
6.
Volponi
,
A.
,
DePold
,
H.
,
Ganguli
,
R.
, and
Chen
,
D.
,
2000
, “
The Use of Kalman Filter and Neural Network Methodologies in Gas Turbine Performance Diagnostics: a Comparative Study
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
125
, pp.
917
–
924
.
7.
Kobayashi, T., and Simon, D. L., 2001, “A Hybrid Neural Network-Genetic Algorithm Technique for Aircraft Engine Performance Diagnostics,” 37th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.
8.
Daniele, C., Krosel, S., Szuch, J., and Westerkamp, E., 1983, “Digital Computer Program for Generating Dynamic Turbofan Engine Models (DIGTEM),” NASA Technical Memorandum 83446.
9.
Szuch, J., Krosel, S., and Bruton, W., 1982, “Automated Procedure for Developing Hybrid Computer Simulations of Turbofan Engines,” NASA Technical Paper 1851.
10.
Friedland
,
B.
,
1969
, “
Treatment of Bias in Recursive Filtering
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
,
AC14
, pp.
359
–
367
.
11.
Lambert, H., 1991, “A Simulation Study of Tubofan Engine Deterioration Estimation Using Kalman Filtering Techniques,” NASA Technical Memorandum 104233.
12.
Roemer, M., and Kacprzynski, G., 2000, “Advanced Diagnostics and Prognostics for Turbine Engine Risk Assessment,” IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT., pp. 345–353.
13.
Anderson, B., and Moore, J., 1979, Optimal Filtering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14.
Fletcher, R., 1981, Practical Methods of Optimization, Vol. 2: Constrained Optimization, Wiley, New York.
15.
Gill, P., Murray, W., and Wright, M., 1981, Practical Optimization, Academic, New York.
16.
Daniele, C., and McLaughlin, P., 1984, “The Real-Time Performance of a Parallel, Nonlinear Simulation Technique Applied to a Turbofan Engine,” Modeling and Simulation on Microcomputers, R. Swartz, ed., Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, CA, pp. 167–171.
17.
Merrill
,
W.
,
1984
, “
Identification of Multivariable High-Performance Turbofan Engine Dynamics From Closed-Loop Data
,”
J. Guid. Control Dyn.
,
7
, pp.
677
–
683
.
18.
Chen, C., 1999, Linear System Theory and Design, Oxford University Press, New York.
19.
Sasahara, O., 1985, “JT9D Engine/Module Performance Deterioration Results From Back to Back Testing,” International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines, Beijing, pp. 528–535.
20.
Gelb, A., 1974, Applied Optimal Estimation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.