Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 1950
This article was originally published in
Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Closures
Closure to “Discussions of ‘Some Factors Influencing the Economics of Reheat Installations’ and ‘Selection of Steam Conditions for No. 4 Unit—Riverside Generating Station’ and ‘A Comparison of Costs of Reheat Versus Nonreheat for 100-Mw Units’” (1950, Trans. ASME, 72, pp. 561–564)
R. C. Dannettel,
R. C. Dannettel
Consolidated Gas Electric Light and Power Company of Baltimore, Baltimore, Md.
Search for other works by this author on:
G. S. Harris
G. S. Harris
Consolidated Gas Electric Light and Power Company of Baltimore, Baltimore, Md.
Search for other works by this author on:
R. C. Dannettel
Consolidated Gas Electric Light and Power Company of Baltimore, Baltimore, Md.
G. S. Harris
Consolidated Gas Electric Light and Power Company of Baltimore, Baltimore, Md.
Trans. ASME. Jul 1950, 72(5): 564-565 (2 pages)
Published Online: July 29, 2022
Article history
Published:
July 1, 1950
Online:
July 29, 2022
Article
Article discussed|
View article
Article discussed|
View article
Article discussed|
View article
Discussions
Discussion for this article|
View discussion
Discussion for this article|
View discussion
Discussion for this article|
View discussion
Discussion for this article|
View discussion
Discussion for this article|
View discussion
Discussion for this article|
View discussion
Closures
Closure for this article|
View closure
Connected Content
This is a commentary to:
A Comparison of Costs of Reheat Versus Nonreheat for 100-Mw Units
This is a commentary to:
Selection of Steam Conditions for No. 4 Unit—Riverside Generating Station
This is a commentary to:
Some Factors Influencing the Economics of Reheat Installations
A commentary has been published:
Closure to “Discussions of ‘Some Factors Influencing the Economics of Reheat Installations’ and ‘Selection of Steam Conditions for No. 4 Unit—Riverside Generating Station’ and ‘A Comparison of Costs of Reheat Versus Nonreheat for 100-Mw Units’” (1950, Trans. ASME, 72, pp. 561–564)
Citation
Dannettel, R. C., and Harris, G. S. (July 29, 2022). "Closure to “Discussions of ‘Some Factors Influencing the Economics of Reheat Installations’ and ‘Selection of Steam Conditions for No. 4 Unit—Riverside Generating Station’ and ‘A Comparison of Costs of Reheat Versus Nonreheat for 100-Mw Units’” (1950, Trans. ASME, 72, pp. 561–564)." ASME. Trans. ASME. July 1950; 72(5): 564–565. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4016761
Download citation file:
21
Views
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Performance and Economics of Advanced Energy Conversion Systems for Coal and Coal-Derived Fuels
J. Eng. Power (April,1978)
Preliminary Economics of Black Liquor Gasifier/Gas Turbine Cogeneration at Pulp and Paper Mills
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2000)
A Rankine Bottoming Cycle System for Heavy-Duty Applications
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,1988)
Development of a Hydrogen-Fueled Combustion Turbine Cycle for Power Generation
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,1998)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction
Thermal Power Plant Cooling: Context and Engineering
A Utility Perspective of Wind Energy
Wind Turbine Technology: Fundamental Concepts in Wind Turbine Engineering, Second Edition
Importance of Effective Monitoring
Consensus on Operating Practices for the Sampling and Monitoring of Feedwater and Boiler Water Chemistry in Modern Industrial Boilers (CRTD-81)
