On-line leak detection is a main concern for the safe operation of pipelines. Acoustic and mass balance are the most important and extensively applied technologies in field problems. The objective of this work is to compare these leak detection methods with respect to a given reference situation, i.e., the same pipeline and monitoring signals acquired at the inlet and outlet ends. Experimental tests were conducted in a 749 m long laboratory pipeline transporting water as the working fluid. The instrumentation included pressure transducers and electromagnetic flowmeters. Leaks were simulated by opening solenoid valves placed at known positions and previously calibrated to produce known average leak flow rates. Results have clearly shown the limitations and advantages of each method. It is also quite clear that acoustics and mass balance technologies are, in fact, complementary. In general, an acoustic leak detection system sends out an alarm more rapidly and locates the leak more precisely, provided that the rupture of the pipeline occurs abruptly enough. On the other hand, a mass balance leak detection method is capable of quantifying the leak flow rate very accurately and of detecting progressive leaks.

1.
Papadakis
,
G. A.
,
Porter
,
S.
, and
Wettig
,
J.
, 1999, “
EU Initiative on the Control of Major Accident Hazards Arising From Pipelines
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
0950-4230,
12
(
1
), pp.
85
90
.
2.
Stouffs
,
P.
, and
Giot
,
M.
, 1993, “
Pipeline Balance: Leak Detection Based on Mass Importance of the Packing Term
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
0950-4230,
6
(
5
), pp.
307
312
.
3.
Chuanhu
G.
,
Guizeng
,
W.
, and
Hao
,
Y.
, 2008, “
Analysis of the Smallest Detectable Leakage Flow Rate of Negative
,”
Comput. Chem. Eng.
0098-1354,
32
(
8
), pp.
1669
1680
.
4.
Silk
,
M. G.
, and
Carter
,
P.
, 1995, “
A Review of Means of Pipeline Leak Detection Independent of Flow Measurement
,”
Proceedings of the EC Project DE-PIRE DGXII Meeting
, Harwell, UK.
5.
Liou
,
C. P.
, 1998, “
Pipeline Leak Detection by Impulse Response Extraction
,”
ASME Trans. J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
120
(
4
), pp.
833
838
.
6.
Sattar
,
A. M.
and
Chaudhry
,
M. H.
, 2008, “
Leak Detection in Pipelines by Frequency Response Method
,”
J. Hydraul. Res.
0022-1686,
46
(
1
), pp.
138
151
.
7.
Siebert
,
H.
, 1981, “
A Simple Method for Detecting and Locating Small Leaks in Gas Pipelines
,”
Process Automation
,
2
, pp.
90
95
.
8.
Ellul
,
I.
, 1989, “
Pipeline Leak Detection
,”
Chem. Eng. (New York, NY)
0009-2460,
461
, pp.
39
44
.
9.
Selli
,
M. F.
, and
Seleghim
,
P.
, Jr.
, 2007, “
On-Line Identification of Horizontal Two-Phase Flow Regimes Through Gabor Transform and Neural Network Processing
,”
Heat Transfer Eng.
0145-7632,
28
, pp.
541
548
.
10.
Belsito
,
S.
,
Lombardi
,
P.
,
Andreussi
,
P.
, and
Banerjee
,
S.
, 1998, “
Leak Detection in Liquefied Gas Pipelines by Artificial Neural Networks
,”
AIChE J.
0001-1541,
44
(
12
), pp.
2675
2688
.
11.
Allen
,
R. L.
, and
Mills
,
D. W.
, 2004,
Signal Analysis Time, Frequency, Scale, and Structure
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
12.
Szirtes
,
G.
,
Póczos
,
B.
, and
Lőrincz
,
A.
, 2005, “
Neural Kalman Filter
,”
Neurocomputing
0925-2312,
65–66
, pp.
349
355
.
13.
Botros
,
K. K.
,
Geerligsa
,
J.
,
Zhoub
,
J.
, and
Gloverb
,
A.
, 2007, “
Measurements of Flow Parameters and Decompression Wave Speed Following Rupture of Rich Gas Pipelines, and Comparison With GASDECOM
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
0308-0161,
84
(
6
), pp.
358
367
.
14.
Duck
,
F. A.
,
Baker
,
A. C.
, and
Starritt
,
H. C.
, 1998,
Ultrasound in Medicine
,
Institute of Physics
,
University of Reading, Berkshire
.
You do not currently have access to this content.