Although the potential of synthetic jets as flow separation control actuators has been demonstrated in the existing literature, there is a large gap between the synthetic jet actuators (SJA) used in laboratory demonstrations and the SJAs needed in realistic, full-scale applications, in terms of compactness, weight, efficiency, control authority and power density. In most cases, the SJAs used in demonstrations are either too large or too weak for realistic applications. In this work, we present the development of a new class of high-power synthetic jet actuators for realistic flow control applications. The operating principle of the actuator is the same as that of crankshaft driven piston engines, which makes a significant part of the technology necessary for the actuator development available off-the-shelf. The design of the actuator is modular and scalable. Several “building block” units can be stacked in series to create the actuator of the desired size. Moreover, active exit slot reconfiguration, in the form of variable exit slot width, decouples the actuator frequency from the actuator jet momentum coefficient and allows the user to set the two independently (within limits). Part I of this paper presents the design, fabrication and bench top characterization of the actuator. Several versions of the actuator were designed, built and tested, leading up to the development of a six-piston compact actuator that has a maximum power consumption of 1200 W (1.6 hp) and can produce (for the tested conditions) peak exit velocities as high as 124 m/s. In Part II, the actuator was housed in the interior of a NACA0015 profiled wing with a chord of 0.375 m (14.75 inches). The assembly’s performance in controlling flow separation was studied in the wind tunnel.

1.
Amitay, M., Smith, B. L., and Glezer, A., 1998, “Aerodynamic Flow Control Using Synthetic Jet Technology,” AIAA Paper No. 98-0208.
2.
Smith, D., Amitay, M., Kibens, V., Parekh, D., and Glezer, A., 1998, “Modifications of Lifting Body Aerodynamics Using Synthetic Jet Actuators,” AIAA Paper No. 98-0209.
3.
Seifert
,
A.
,
Bachat
,
T.
,
Koss
,
D.
,
Shepshelovich
,
M.
, and
Wygnanski
,
I.
,
1993
, “
Oscillatory Blowing: A Tool to Delay Boundary-Layer Separation
,”
AIAA J.
,
31
, No.
11
, pp.
2052
2060
.
4.
Seifert, A., and Pack, L., 1998, “Oscillatory Excitation of Separation at High Reynolds Number,” AIAA Paper No. 98-0214.
5.
Seifert, A., and Pack, L., 1999, “Oscillatory Excitation of Unsteady Compressible Flows Over Airfoils at Flight Reynolds Number,” AIAA Paper No. 99-0925.
6.
Greenblatt, D., and Wygnanski, I., 1998, “Dynamic Stall Control by Oscillatory Forcing,” AIAA Paper No. 98-0676.
7.
Greenblatt, D., Darabi, A., Nishri, B., and Wygnanski, I., 1998, “Separation Control by Periodic Addition of Momentum With Particular Emphasis on Dynamic Stall,” Proceedings Heli Japan 98, Paper T3-4, American Helicopter Society.
8.
Honohan, A. M., Amitay, M., and Glezer, A., 2000, “Aerodynamic Control Using Synthetic Jets,” AIAA Paper No. 2000-2401.
9.
Parekh, D. E., and Glezer, A., 2000, “AVIA: Adaptive Virtual Aerosurface,” AIAA Paper No. 2000-2474.
10.
Smith, B. L., and Glezer, A., 1997, “Vectoring and Small-Scale Motions Effected in Free Shear Flows Using Synthetic Jet Actuators,” AIAA Paper No. 97-0213.
11.
Smith, B. L., Trautman, M. A., and Glezer, A., 1999, “Controlled Interactions of Adjacent Synthetic Jets,” AIAA Paper No. 99-0669.
12.
Pack, L., and Seifert, A., 1999, “Periodic Excitation for Jet Vectoring and Enhanced Spreading,” AIAA Paper No. 99-0672.
13.
Rathnasingham
,
R.
, and
Breuer
,
K.
,
1997
, “
Coupled Fluid-Structural Characteristics of Actuators for Flow Control
,”
AIAA J.
,
35
, pp.
832
837
.
14.
Seifert
,
A.
,
Eliahu
,
S.
,
Greenblatt
,
D.
, and
Wygnanski
,
I.
,
1998
, “
On the Use of Piezoelectric Actuators for Airfoil Separation Control
,”
AIAA J.
,
36
, pp.
1535
1537
.
15.
McCormick, D., 2000, “Boundary Layer Separation Control With Directed Synthetic Jets,” AIAA Paper No. 2000-0519.
16.
Rizzetta
,
D.
,
Visbal
,
M.
, and
Stanek
,
M.
,
1999
, “
Numerical Investigations of Synthetic-Jet Flow Fields
,”
AIAA J.
,
37
, pp.
919
927
.
17.
Rao, P., Gilarranz, J. L., Ko, J., Strganac, T., and Rediniotis, O. K., 2000, “Flow Separation Control Via Synthetic Jet Actuation,” AIAA Paper 2000-0407.
18.
Mu¨ller, M., Bernal, L., Moran, R., Washabaugh, P., Parviz, B., and Najafi, K., 2000, “Micromachined Acoustic Resonators for Microjet Propulsion,” AIAA Paper 2000-0547.
19.
Amitay, M., Honohan, A., Trautman, M., and Glezer, A., 1997, “Modification of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of Bluff Bodies Using Fluidic Actuators,” AIAA Paper No. 97-2004.
20.
Seifert
,
A.
,
Darabi
,
A.
, and
Wygnanski
,
I.
,
1996
, “
Delay of Airfoil Stall by Periodic Excitation
,”
AIAA J.
,
33
,
No. 4
No. 4
.
21.
Gilarranz, J. L., 2001, “Development of High-Power, Compact Synthetic Jet Actuators for Flow Separation Control,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, Texas.
22.
Gilarranz, J. L., Traub, L. W., and Rediniotis, O. K., 2002, “Characterization of a Compact, High-Power Synthetic Jet Actuator for Flow Separation Control,” AIAA Paper No. 2002-0127.
23.
Johansen, E. S., 2002, “Development of a Fast-Response Multi-Hole Probe for Unsteady and Turbulent Flowfields,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
You do not currently have access to this content.