The effect of the planform of hydrofoils on tip vortex roll-up and cavitation has been investigated by testing three foils having the same NACA 16020 cross section but different shapes. One foil has an elliptical shape while the other two are shaped like quarters of ellipses; one with a straight leading edge and the other with a straight trailing edge. Experiments were conducted in the ENSTA, Ecole Navale and IMHEF cavitation tunnels with homologous foils of different sizes to investigate Reynolds number effects. Hydrodynamic forces as well as cavitation inception and desinence performance were measured as a function of Reynolds number and foil incidence angle. Laser Doppler measurements of the tangential and axial velocity profiles in the region immediately downstream of the tip were also performed. At equal incidence angle and Reynolds number, the three foils show different critical cavitation conditions and the maximum tangential velocity near the tip increases as the hydrofoil tip is moved from a forward to a rear position. However, the velocity profiles become more similar with increasing downstream distance, and at downstream distances greater than one chord aft of the tip, the differences between the foils disappear. The rate of tip vortex roll-up is much faster for the straight leading edge than for the straight trailing edge foil and, in the latter case, a significant portion of the roll-up occurs along the foil curved leading edge. The minimum of the pressure coefficient on the axis of the vortex was estimated from the velocity measurements and correlated with the desinent cavitation number for the largest free stream velocities. The correlation of data is very satisfactory. At the highest Reynolds number tested and at equal lift coefficients, the straight leading edge foil displays the most favorable cavitation desinent numbers.

1.
Arndt, R. E. A., and Keller, A. P., 1991, Water Quality Effects on Cavitation Inception in a Trailing Vortex, Cavitation 91, ASME FED 116, pp. 1–8 and (1992), ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING, 114, pp. 430–438.
2.
Arndt, R. E. A., and Dugue´, C., 1992, Recent Advances in Tip Vortex Cavitation Research, International Symposium on Propulsors and Cavitation, Hamburg, June.
3.
Billet, M. L., and Holl, J. W., 1979, Scale Effects on Various Types of Limited Cavitation, International Symposium on Cavitation Inception, ASME Winter Annual Meeting, New York, pp. 11–23.
4.
Crimi
,
1970
,
Experimental Study of the Effects of Sweep on Hydrofoil Loading and Cavitation
,
Journal of Hydronautics
, Vol.
4
, pp.
3
9
.
5.
Fruman, D. H., Dugue´, C., and Cerrutti, P., 1991, Tip Vortex Roll-Up and Cavitation, Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, ASME FED 109, pp. 43–48.
6.
Fruman, D. H., Dugue´, C., and Cerrutti, P., 1992a, Enroulement et cavitation de tourbillon marginal, Revue Scientifique et Technique de la De´fense, pp. 133–141.
7.
Fruman, D. H., Dugue´, C., Pauchet, A., Cerrutti, P., and Brianc¸on-Marjollet, L., 1992b, Tip Vortex Roll-Up and Cavitation, Nineteenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Aug. 24–28, Seoul.
8.
Fruman, D. H., Castro, F., Pauchet, A., and Pichon, T., 1994, On Tip Vortex Turbulence, Wandering and Cavitation Occurrence, Second International Symposium on Cavitation, Tokyo, Japan, April.
9.
Green
S. I.
,
1991
,
Correlating Single Phase Flow Measurements with Observations of Trailing Vortex Cavitation
,
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
113
, pp.
125
129
.
10.
Green
S. I.
, and
Acosta
A. J.
,
1991
,
Unsteady Flow in Trailing Vortices
,
Journal of Fluid Mech.
, Vol.
227
, pp.
107
134
.
11.
Lamb, H., 1945, Hydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, London and New York.
12.
Lindsey, W. F., Stevenson, D. B., and Daley, B. N., 1948, Aerodynamic Characteristics of 24 NACA 16-Series Airfoils at Mach Numbers Between 0.3 and 0.8, NACA Technical Report No. 1546.
13.
McCormick, B. W., 1962, On Cavitation Produced by a Vortex Trailing from a Lifting Surface, ASME Journal of Basic Engineering, Sept., pp. 369–379.
14.
Pauchet A., Briancon-Marjollet L., and Fruman D. H., 1993, Recent Results on the Effect of Cross Section on Hydrofoil Tip Vortex Cavitation Occurrence at High Reynolds Numbers, Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, ASME FED 153, pp. 81–86.
15.
Pogozelski, E. M., Shekarriz, A., Katz, J., and Huang, T. T., 1993, Three Dimensional Near Field Behaviour of a Tip Vortex Developing on an Elliptic Foil, 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV.
16.
Schlichting, H., 1979, Boundary Layer Theory, Sixth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
17.
Spivey, R. F., 1968, Blade Tip Aerodynamics-Profile and Planform Effects, 24th Annual National Forum Proceedings, Washington D.C., May 8–10.
18.
Stinebring
D. R.
,
Farrell
K. J.
, and
Billet
M. L.
,
1991
,
The Structure of a Three-Dimensional Tip Vortex at High Reynolds Numbers
,
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
113
, pp.
496
503
.
19.
van Dam
C. P.
,
1987
,
Induced Drag Characteristics of Crescent Moon Shaped Wings
,
Journal of Aircraft
, Vol.
24
, No.
2
, pp.
115
119
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.