At the end of 2015 the U.S. held 5.6% or approximately 369 Tcf of worldwide conventional natural gas proved reserves (British Petroleum Company, 2016, “BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2016,” British Petroleum Co., London). If unconventional gas sources are considered, natural gas reserves rise steeply to 2276 Tcf. Shale gas alone accounts for approximately 750 Tcf of the technically recoverable gas reserves in the U.S. (U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2011, “Review of Emerging Resources: U.S. Shale Gas and Shale Oil plays,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC). However, this represents only a very small fraction of the gas associated with shale formations and is indicative of current technological limits. This manuscript addresses the question of recovery efficiency/recovery factor (RF) in fractured gas shales. Predictions of gas RF in fractured shale gas reservoirs are presented as a function of operating conditions, non-Darcy flow, gas slippage, proppant crushing, and proppant diagenesis. Recovery factors are simulated using a fully implicit, three-dimensional, two-phase, dual-porosity finite difference model that was developed specifically for this purpose. The results presented in this article provide clear insight into the range of recovery factors one can expect from a fractured shale gas formation, the impact that operation procedures and other phenomena have on these recovery factors, and the efficiency or inefficiency of contemporary shale gas production technology.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2017
Research-Article
Recovery Efficiency in Hydraulically Fractured Shale Gas Reservoirs
Maxian B. Seales,
Maxian B. Seales
Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: maxian_seales@yahoo.com
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: maxian_seales@yahoo.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Turgay Ertekin,
Turgay Ertekin
Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: eur@psu.edu
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: eur@psu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
John Yilin Wang
John Yilin Wang
Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: John.wang@psu.edu
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: John.wang@psu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Maxian B. Seales
Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: maxian_seales@yahoo.com
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: maxian_seales@yahoo.com
Turgay Ertekin
Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: eur@psu.edu
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: eur@psu.edu
John Yilin Wang
Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering,
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: John.wang@psu.edu
The Pennsylvania State University,
202 Hosler Building,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: John.wang@psu.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Petroleum Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received February 1, 2016; final manuscript received February 12, 2017; published online March 16, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Deepak Devegowda.
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Jul 2017, 139(4): 042901 (8 pages)
Published Online: March 16, 2017
Article history
Received:
February 1, 2016
Revised:
February 12, 2017
Citation
Seales, M. B., Ertekin, T., and Yilin Wang, J. (March 16, 2017). "Recovery Efficiency in Hydraulically Fractured Shale Gas Reservoirs." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. July 2017; 139(4): 042901. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036043
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
A Proxy Model for Predicting SAGD Production From Reservoirs Containing Shale Barriers
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December,2018)
Scaling Criteria for Waterflooding and Immiscible CO 2 Flooding in Heavy Oil Reservoirs
J. Energy Resour. Technol (March,2017)
Analytical Solutions for a Quad-Linear Flow Model Derived for Multistage Fractured Horizontal Wells in Tight Oil Reservoirs
J. Energy Resour. Technol (January,2017)
Solvent Selection Criteria and Optimal Application Conditions for Heavy-Oil/Bitumen Recovery at Elevated Temperatures: A Review and Comparative Analysis
J. Energy Resour. Technol (January,2016)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
The Context of Thermal Power Plant Water Usage
Thermal Power Plant Cooling: Context and Engineering
Corrosion in Injection Systems
Corrosion and Materials in Hydrocarbon Production: A Compendium of Operational and Engineering Aspects
Thermodynamic Measurements
Metrology and Instrumentation: Practical Applications for Engineering and Manufacturing