Optimum pressure ratios of a regenerative gas turbine (RGT) power plant with and without a solid oxide fuel cell are investigated. It is shown that assuming a constant specific heat ratio throughout the RGT plant, explicit expressions can be derived for the optimum pressure ratios leading to maximum thermal efficiency and maximum net work output. It would be analytically complicated to apply the same method for the hybrid system due to the dependence of electrochemical parameters such as cell voltage on thermodynamic parameters like pressure and temperature. So, the thermodynamic optimization of this system is numerically studied using models of RGT plant and solid oxide fuel cell. Irreversibilities in terms of component efficiencies and total pressure drop within each configuration are taken into account. The main results for the RGT plant include maximization of the work output at the expenses of 2–4% lower thermal efficiency and higher capital costs of turbo-compressor compared to a design based on maximum thermal efficiency. On the other hand, the hybrid system is studied for a turbine inlet temperature (TIT) of 1 250–1 450 K and 10–20% total pressure drop in the system. The maximum thermal efficiency is found to be at a pressure ratio of 3–4, which is consistent with past studies. A higher TIT leads to a higher pressure ratio; however, no significant effect of pressure drop on the optimum pressure ratio is observed. The maximum work output of the hybrid system may take place at a pressure ratio at which the compressor outlet temperature is equal to the turbine downstream temperature. The work output increases with increasing the pressure ratio up to a point after which it starts to vary slightly. The pressure ratio at this point is suggested to be the optimal because the work output is very close to its maximum and the thermal efficiency is as high as a littler less than 60%.

References

1.
Hernandez
,
A. C.
,
Medina
,
A.
, and
Roco
,
J. M. M.
, 1995, “
Power and Efficiency in a Regenerative Gas Turbine
,”
J. Phys. D
,
28
, pp.
2020
2023
.
2.
Roco
,
J. M. M.
,
Velasco
,
S.
,
Medina
,
A.
, and
Hernandez
,
A. C.
, 1997, “
Optimum Performance of a Regenerative Brayton Thermal Cycle
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
,
82
(
6
), pp.
2735
2741
.
3.
Cheng
,
C.-Y.
, and
Chen
,
C.-K.
, 1997, “
Power Optimization of an Irreversible Brayton Heat Engine
,”
Energy Sources
,
19
(
5
), pp.
461
474
.
4.
Cheng
,
C.-Y.
, and
Chen
,
C.-K.
, 1998, “
Efficiency Optimizations of an Irreversible Brayton Heat Engine
,”
ASME J. Energy Resources Technol
.,
120
, pp.
143
148
.
5.
Erbay
,
L. B.
,
Goktun
,
S.
, and
Yavuz
,
H.
, 2001, “
Optimal Design of the Regenerative Gas Turbine Engine With Isothermal Heat Addition
,”
Appl. Energy
,
68
, pp.
249
264
.
6.
Sahin
,
B.
,
Kesgin
,
U.
,
Kodal
,
A.
, and
Vardar
,
N.
, 2002, “
Performance Optimization of a New Combined Power Cycle Based on Power Density Analysis of the Dual Cycle
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
43
, pp.
2019
2031
.
7.
Wang
,
W.
,
Chen
,
L.
,
Sun
,
F.
, and
Wu
,
C.
, 2005, “
Power Optimization of an Irreversible Closed Intercooled Regenerated Brayton Cycle Coupled to Variable-Temperature Heat Reservoirs
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
25
, pp.
1097
1113
.
8.
Najjar
,
Y. S. H.
, and
Ismail
,
M. S.
, 1990, “
Optimum Pressure Ratios for Different Gas Turbine Cycles
,”
High Temp. Technol.
,
8
(
4
), pp.
283
289
.
9.
Campanari
,
S.
, 2001, “
Thermodynamic Model and Parametric Analysis of a Tubular SOFC Module
,”
J. Power Sources
,
92
(
1–2
), pp.
26
34
.
10.
Costamagna
,
P.
,
Magistri
,
L.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
, 2001, “
Design and Part-Load Performance of a Hybrid System Based on a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Reactor and a Micro Gas Turbine
,”
J. Power Sources
,
96
(
2
), pp.
352
368
.
11.
Onda
,
K.
,
Iwanari
,
T.
,
Miyauchi
,
N.
,
Ito
,
K.
,
Ohba
,
T.
,
Sakaki
,
Y.
, and
Nagata
,
S.
, 2003, “
Cycle Analysis of Combined Power Generation by Planar SOFC and Gas Turbine Considering Cell Temperature and Current Density Distributions
,”
J. Electrochem. Soc.
,
150
(
12
), pp.
A1569
A1576
.
12.
Chan
,
S. H.
,
Ho
,
S. K.
, and
Tian
,
Y.
, 2003,“
Multi-Level Modeling of SOFC–Gas Turbine Hybrid System
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
28
, pp.
889
900
.
13.
Uechi
,
H.
,
Kimijima
,
S.
, and
Kasagi
,
N.
, 2004, “
Cycle Analysis of Gas Turbine-Fuel Cell Cycle Hybrid Micro Generation System
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
126
(
4
), pp.
755
762
.
14.
Park
,
S. K.
, and
Kim
,
T. S.
, 2006, “
Comparison Between Pressurized Design and Ambient Pressure Design of Hybrid Solid Oxide Fuel Cell–Gas Turbine Systems
,”
J. Power Sources
,
163
, pp.
490
499
.
15.
Yang
,
W. J.
,
Park
,
S. K.
,
Kim
,
T. S.
,
Kim
,
J. H.
,
Sohn
,
J. L.
, and
Ro
,
S. T.
, 2006, “
Design Performance Analysis of Pressurized Solid Oxide Fuel Cell/Gas Turbine Hybrid Systems Considering Temperature Constraints
,”
J. Power Sources
,
160
, pp.
462
473
.
16.
Park
,
S. K.
,
Oh
,
K. S.
, and
Kim
,
T. S.
, 2007, “
Analysis of the Design of a Pressurized SOFC Hybrid System Using a Fixed Gas Turbine Design
,”
J. Power Sources
,
170
, pp.
130
139
.
17.
Sánchez
,
D.
,
Chacartegui
,
R.
,
Sánchez
,
T.
,
Martínez
,
J.
, and
Rosa
,
F.
, 2008, “
A Comparison Between Conventional Recuperative Gas Turbine and Hybrid Solid Oxide Fuel Cell–Gas Turbine Systems With Direct/Indirect Integration
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A
,
122
, pp.
149
159
.
18.
Musa
,
A.
, and
De Paepe
,
M.
, 2008, “
Performance of Combined Internally Reformed Intermediate/High Temperature SOFC Cycle Compared to Internally Reformed Two-Staged Intermediate Temperature SOFC Cycle
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
33
, pp.
4665
4672
.
19.
Burbank
,
W.
,
Witmer
,
D.
, and
Holcomb
,
F.
, 2009, “
Model of a Novel Pressurized Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Gas Turbine Hybrid Engine
,”
J. Power Sources
,
193
, pp.
656
664
.
20.
George
,
R. A.
, 1997, “
SOFC Combined Cycle Systems for Distributed Generation.”
Proc. Am. Power Conf.
,
59–1
, pp.
548
550
.
21.
George
,
R. A.
, 2000, “
Status of Tubular SOFC Field Unit Demonstrations.”
J. Power Sources
,
86
(
1–2
), pp.
134
139
.
22.
Larminie
,
J.
, and
Dicks
,
A.
, 2003,
Fuel Cell Systems Explained
, 2nd ed.,
Wiley
,
West Sussex, UK
.
23.
Burer
,
M.
,
Tanaka
,
K.
,
Favrat
,
D.
, and
Yamada
,
K.
, 2003, “
Multi-Criteria Optimization of a District Cogeneration Plant Integrating a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell–Gas Turbine Combined Cycle, Heat Pumps and Chillers
,”
Energy
,
28
, pp.
497
518
.
24.
Yi
,
Y.
,
Rao
,
A. D.
,
Brouwer
,
J.
, and
Samuelsen
,
G. S.
, 2004, “
Analysis and Optimization of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Intercooled Gas Turbine (SOFC–ICGT) Hybrid Cycle
,”
J. Power Sources
,
132
, pp.
77
85
.
25.
Kurz
,
R.
, 2005, “
Parameter Optimization on Combined Gas Turbine-Fuel Cell Power Plants
,”
ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol.
,
2
, pp.
268
273
.
26.
Calise
,
F.
,
Dentice d’Accadia
,
M.
,
Vanoli
,
L.
, and
von Spakovsky
,
M. R.
, 2006, “
Single-Level Optimization of a Hybrid SOFC–GT Power Plant
,”
J. Power Sources
,
159
, pp.
1169
1185
.
27.
Calise
,
F.
,
Dentice d’Accadia
,
M.
,
Vanoli
,
L.
, and
von Spakovsky
,
M. R.
, 2007, “
Full Load Synthesis/Design Optimization of a Hybrid SOFC–GT Power Plant
,”
Energy
,
32
, pp.
446
458
.
28.
Haseli
,
Y.
,
Dincer
,
I.
, and
Naterer
,
G. R.
, 2008, “
Thermodynamic Modeling of a Gas Turbine Cycle Combined With a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
33
, pp.
5811
5822
.
29.
Calise
,
F.
,
Palombo
,
A.
, and
Vanoli
,
L.
, 2006, “
Design and Partial Load Exergy Analysis of Hybrid SOFC–GT Power Plant
,”
J. Power Sources
,
158
(
1
), pp.
225
244
.
30.
Calise
,
F.
,
Dentice d’Accadia
,
M.
,
Palombo
,
A.
, and
Vanoli
,
L.
, “
Simulation and Exergy Analysis of a Hybrid Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC)–Gas Turbine System”
,
Energy
,
31
(
15
), pp.
3278
3299
.
31.
Sohn
,
J. L.
,
Yang
,
J. S.
, and
Ro
,
S. T.
, 2007, “
Performance Characteristics of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell/Gas Turbine Hybrid System With Various Part-Load Control Modes
,”
J. Power Sources
,
166
(
1
), pp.
155
164
.
32.
Fuel Cell Handbook
, 7th ed.,
EG&G Services Parsons, Inc. Science Applications International Corporation
,
Morgantown, WV
, 2004.
You do not currently have access to this content.