A probabilistic-based component design methodology is developed for a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stack. This method takes into account the randomness in SOFC material properties as well as the stresses arising from different manufacturing and operating conditions. The purpose of this work is to provide the SOFC designers a design methodology so that the desired level of component reliability can be achieved with deterministic design functions using an equivalent safety factor to account for the uncertainties in material properties and structural stresses. Multiphysics-based finite element analyses were used to predict the electrochemical and thermal mechanical responses of SOFC stacks with different geometric variations and under different operating conditions. Failures in the anode and the seal were used as design examples. The predicted maximum principal stresses in the anode and the seal were compared with the experimentally determined strength characteristics for the anode and the seal, respectively. Component failure probabilities for the current design were then calculated under different operating conditions. It was found that anode failure probability is very low under all conditions examined. The seal failure probability is relatively high, particularly for high fuel utilization rate under low average cell temperature. Next, the procedures for calculating the equivalent safety factors for the anode and seal were demonstrated so that a uniform failure probability of the anode and seal can be achieved. Analysis procedures were also included for non-normal distributed random variables so that more realistic distributions of strength and stress can be analyzed using the proposed design methodology.

1.
Koeppel
,
B. J.
,
Nguyen
,
B. N.
, and
Khaleel
,
M. A.
, 2005, “
Analysis of Seal Damage During Thermal Cycling of a Multi-Cell SOFC Stack
,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Report No. PNNL-15086, Richland, WA.
2.
Lara-Curzio
,
E.
, 2005, “
Durability and Reliability of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
,” ORNL’s Technical Presentation at SECA Core Technology Peer Review Workshop,
Tampa, FL
, Jan. 27–28.
3.
Qu
,
J.
, 2005. “
An Integrated Approach to Modeling and Mitigating SOFC Failure
,” Georgia Institute of Technology’s Technical Presentation at SECA Core Technology Peer Review Workshop,
Tampa, FL
, Jan. 27–28.
4.
Johnson
,
K. I.
,
Korolev
,
V. N.
,
Koeppel
,
B. J.
,
Recknagle
,
K. P.
,
Khaleel
,
M. A.
,
Malcolm
,
D.
, and
Pursell
,
Z.
, 2005, “
Finite Element Analysis of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Using SOFC-MP™ and MSC. Marc/Mentat-FC™
,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Report No. PNNL-15154, Richland, WA.
5.
Recknagle
,
K. P.
,
Williford
,
R. E.
,
Chick
,
L. A.
,
Rector
,
D. R.
, and
Khaleel
,
M. A.
, 2003, “
Three-Dimensional Thermo-Fluid and Electrochemical Modeling of Planar SOFC Stacks
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
113
, pp.
109
114
.
6.
Ang
,
A. H.-S.
, and
Tang
,
W. H.
, 1984,
Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design. Volume II Decision, Risk and Reliability
Wiley
,
New York
.
7.
SECA materials website: http://www.seca.doe.gov/~secamat/http://www.seca.doe.gov/~secamat/. Anode strength measured by E. Lara-Curzio, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oakridge, TN.
8.
Vetrano
,
J. S.
,
Chou
,
Y. S.
,
Grant
,
G. J.
,
Koeppel
,
B. J.
,
Nguyen
,
B. N.
, and
Khaleel
,
M. A.
, 2005, “
Mechanical Testing of Glass Seals for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Report No. PNNL-15463, Richland, WA.
9.
Meinhardt
,
K. D.
, 2005, “
Ranges of Anode Thickness and Seal Width and Thickness During SOFC Manufacturing Process
,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.
You do not currently have access to this content.