Noise rejection, handling the difficulties coming from the mathematical representation of the system under investigation and alleviation of structural or unstructural uncertainties constitute prime challenges that are frequently encountered in the practice of systems and control engineering. Designing a controller has primarily the aim of achieving the tracking precision as well as a degree of robustness against the difficulties stated. From this point of view, variable structure systems theory offer well formulated solutions to such ill-posed problems containing uncertainty and imprecision. In this paper, a simple controller structure is discussed. The architecture is known as Adaptive Linear Element (ADALINE) in the framework of neural computing. The parameters of the controller evolve dynamically in time such that a sliding motion is obtained. The inner sliding motion concerns the establishment of a sliding mode in controller parameters, which aims to minimize the error on the controller outputs. The outer sliding motion is designed for the plant. The algorithm discussed drives the error on the output of the controller toward zero learning error level, and the state tracking error vector of the plant is driven toward the origin of the phase space simultaneously. The paper gives the analysis of the equivalence between the two sliding motions and demonstrates the performance of the algorithm on a three degrees of freedom, anthropoid robotic manipulator. In order to clarify the performance of the scheme, together with the dynamic complexity of the plant, the adverse effects of observation noise and nonzero initial conditions are studied. [S0022-0434(00)01704-4]

1.
Emelyanov, S. V., 1967, Variable Structure Control Systems, Moscow, Nauka.
2.
Erbatur
,
K.
,
Kaynak
,
O.
,
Sabanovic
,
A.
, and
Rudas
,
I.
,
1996
, “
Fuzzy Adaptive Sliding Mode Control of a Direct Drive Robot
,”
Rob. Auton. Syst.
,
19
, No.
2
, pp.
215
227
.
3.
Byungkook
,
Y.
, and
Ham
,
W.
,
1998
, “
Adaptive Fuzzy Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear Systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.
,
6
, No.
2
, pp.
315
321
.
4.
Ertugrul
,
M.
, and
Kaynak
,
O.
,
2000
, “
Neuro Sliding Mode Control of Robotic Manipulators
,”
Mechatronics
,
10
, Nos.
1–2
, pp.
243
267
.
5.
Ertugrul, M., and Kaynak, O., 1998, “Neural Computation of the Equivalent Control in Sliding Mode For Robot Trajectory Control Applications,” Proc. of the 1998 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 2042–2047.
6.
Hung
,
J. Y.
,
Gao
,
W.
, and
Hung
,
J. C.
,
1993
, “
Variable Structure Control: A Survey
,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
,
40
, No.
1
, pp.
2
22
.
7.
Gao
,
W.
, and
Hung
,
J. C.
,
1993
, “
Variable Structure Control of Nonlinear Systems: A New Approach
,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
,
40
, No.
1
, pp.
45
55
.
8.
Kaynak
,
O.
,
Harashima
,
F.
, and
Hashimoto
,
H.
,
1984
, “
Variable Structure Systems Theory, as Applied to Sub-time Optimal Position Control with an Invariant Trajectory
,”
Trans. IEE Jpn. Sec. E
,
104
, Nos.
3/4
, pp.
47
52
.
9.
Bekiroglu, N., 1996, “Adaptive Sliding Surface Design for Sliding Mode Control Systems,” Ph.D. thesis, Bogazici University, Istanbul.
10.
Young
,
K. D.
,
Utkin
,
V. I.
, and
Ozguner
,
U.
,
1999
, “
A Control Engineer’s Guide to Sliding Mode Control
,”
IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.
,
7
, No.
3
, pp.
328
342
.
11.
Kaynak
,
O.
, and
Denker
,
A.
,
1993
, “
Discrete-Time Sliding Mode Control in the Presence of System Uncertainty
,”
Int. J. Control
,
57
, No.
5
, pp.
1177
1189
.
12.
Efe, M. O., and Kaynak, O., “A Novel Optimization Procedure for Training of Fuzzy Inference Systems By Combining Variable Structure Systems Technique and Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm,” Fuzzy Sets Syst. (accepted for publication).
13.
Efe
,
M. O.
, and
Kaynak
,
O.
,
2000
, “
Stabilizing and Robustifying the Learning Mechanisms of Artificial Neural Networks in Control Engineering Applications
,”
Int. J. Intell. Syst.
,
15
, No.
5
, pp.
365
388
.
14.
Efe
,
M. O.
,
Kaynak
,
O.
, and
Wilamowski
,
B. M.
,
2000
, “
Stable Training of Computationally Intelligent Systems By Using Variable Structure Systems Technique
,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
,
47
, No.
2
, pp.
487
496
.
15.
Sira-Ramirez
,
H.
, and
Colina-Morles
,
E.
,
1995
, “
A Sliding Mode Strategy for Adaptive Learning in Adalines
,”
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., I: Fundam. Theory Appl.
,
42
, No.
12
, pp.
1001
1012
.
16.
Yu
,
X.
,
Zhihong
,
M.
, and
Rahman
,
S. M. M.
,
1998
, “
Adaptive Sliding Mode Approach for Learning in a Feedforward Neural Network
,”
Neural Comput. Appl.
,
7
, pp.
289
294
.
17.
Slotine, J.-J. E., and Li, W., 1991, Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18.
Erbatur, K., Vinter, R. B., and Kaynak, O., 1994, “Feedback Linearization Control for a 3-DOF Flexible Joint Elbow Manipulator,” Proc. 1994 IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 4, pp. 2979–2984, San Diego.
19.
Stadler, W., 1995, Analytical Robotics and Mechatronics, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 476.
You do not currently have access to this content.