The use of a robot-vision-tracking system to efficiently process different types of objects presented randomly on a moving conveyor belt requires the system to schedule pick and place operations of the robot to minimize robot processing times and avoid constraint violations. In this paper we present a new approach: a modified ARTMAP neural network is incorporated in the robot-vision-tracking system as an “intelligent” component to on-line schedule pick-place operations in order to obtain optimal orders for any group of objects. When the robot-vision-tracking system is working in a changing environment, the neural networks used in the optimal scheduling task must be capable of updating their weights aperiodically based on the data collected intermittently in real operations in order to create a continuously effective system. The ARTMAP network developed by Carpenter et al, (1991), which can rapidly learn mappings between binary input and binary output vectors by using a supervised learning law, has good properties to deal with this task. In special situations, however, the ARTMAP must employ a complement coding technique to preprocess incoming patterns to be presented to the network. This doubles the size of input patterns and increases learning time. The Modified ARTMAP network, proposed herein, copes with these special situations without using complement coding, and has been shown to increase the overall system speed. The basic idea is to insert a matching check mechanism that internally changes the learning order of input vector pairs in responding to an arbitrary sequence of arriving input vector pairs. Simulation results are presented for scheduling a number of different objects, demonstrating a substantial improvement in learning speed and accuracy.

1.
Feng, K., and Hoberock, L., 1992, “An Optimal Scheduling of Pick-Place Operations of a Robot-Vision-Tracking System by Using the Back-propagation and Hamming Networks,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Roboitcs and Automation, Nice, France.
2.
Grossberg
 
S.
,
1976
, “
Adaptive Pattern Classification and Universal Recording, II: Feedback, Expectation, Olfaction, and Illusions
,”
Biological Cybernetics
, Vol.
23
(
12
), pp.
187
202
.
3.
Carpenter
 
G.
, and
Grossberg
 
S.
,
1987
, “
A Massively Parallel Architecture for a Self-organizing Neural Pattern Recognition Machine
,”
Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing
, Vol.
37
(
1
), pp.
54
115
.
4.
Carpenter
 
G.
,
Grossberg
 
S.
, and
Reynolds
 
J.
,
1991
, “
ARTMAP: Supervised Real-time Learning and Classification of Nonstationary Data by a Self-organizing Neural Network
,”
Neural Networks
, Vol.
4
(
5
), pp.
565
588
.
5.
Hecht-Nielson, R., 1990, Neurocomputing, Addison-Wesley, Reading, M.A.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.