Abstract

Data-driven research in additive manufacturing (AM) has gained significant success in recent years. This has led to a plethora of scientific literature emerging. The knowledge in these works consists of AM and artificial intelligence (AI) contexts that haven't been mined and formalized in an integrated way. Moreover, no tools or guidelines exist to support data-driven knowledge transfer from one context to another. As a result, data-driven solutions using specific AI techniques are being developed and validated only for specific AM process technologies. There is a potential to exploit the inherent similarities across various AM technologies and adapt the existing solutions from one process or problem to another using AI, such as transfer learning (TL). We propose a three-step knowledge transferability analysis framework in AM to support data-driven AM knowledge transfer. As a prerequisite to transferability analysis, AM knowledge is featured into identified knowledge components. The framework consists of pre-transfer, transfer, and post-transfer steps to accomplish knowledge transfer. A case study is conducted between two flagship metal AM processes: laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and directed energy deposition (DED). The relatively mature LPBF is the source while the less developed DED is the target. We show successful transfer at different levels of the data-driven solution, including data representation, model architecture, and model parameters. The pipeline of AM knowledge transfer can be automated in the future to allow efficient cross-context or cross-process knowledge exchange.

Graphical Abstract Figure
Graphical Abstract Figure
Close modal

References

1.
ASTM
,
2022
,
Additive Manufacturing—General Principles—Fundamentals and Vocabulary
,
American Society of Testing Materials
,
Geneva, Switzerland
.
2.
Zhu
,
K.
,
Fuh
,
J. Y. H.
, and
Lin
,
X.
,
2021
, “
Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing Condition Monitoring: A Review on Machine Learning Based Approaches
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
,
27
(
5
), pp.
2495
2510
.
3.
Zhang
,
Y.
, and
Yan
,
W.
,
2022
, “
Applications of Machine Learning in Metal Powder-Bed Fusion In-Process Monitoring and Control: Status and Challenges
,”
J. Intell. Manuf.
,
34
(
6
), pp.
1
24
.
4.
Svetlizky
,
D.
,
Das
,
M.
,
Zheng
,
B.
,
Vyatskikh
,
A. L.
,
Bose
,
S.
,
Bandyopadhyay
,
A.
,
Schoenung
,
J. M.
,
Lavernia
,
E. J.
, and
Eliaz
,
N.
,
2021
, “
Directed Energy Deposition (DED) Additive Manufacturing: Physical Characteristics, Defects, Challenges and Applications
,”
Mater. Today
,
49
, pp.
271
295
.
5.
Qin
,
J.
,
Hu
,
F.
,
Liu
,
Y.
,
Witherell
,
P.
,
Wang
,
C. C.
,
Rosen
,
D. W.
,
Simpson
,
T.
,
Lu
,
Y.
, and
Tang
,
Q.
,
2022
, “
Research and Application of Machine Learning for Additive Manufacturing
,”
Addit. Manuf.
,
52
, pp.
102691
102716
.
6.
Safdar
,
M.
,
Paul
,
P. P.
,
Lamouche
,
G.
,
Wood
,
G.
,
Zimmermann
,
M.
,
Hannesen
,
F.
,
Bescond
,
C.
,
Wanjara
,
P.
, and
Zhao
,
Y. F.
,
2024
, “
Fundamental Requirements of a Machine Learning Operations Platform for Industrial Metal Additive Manufacturing
,”
Comput. Ind.
,
154
, p.
104037
.
7.
Ko
,
H.
,
Lu
,
Y.
,
Yang
,
Z.
,
Ndiaye
,
N. Y.
, and
Witherell
,
P.
,
2023
, “
A Framework Driven by Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Process-Structure-Property Causal Analytics in Additive Manufacturing
,”
J. Manuf. Syst.
,
67
, pp.
213
228
.
8.
Ko
,
H.
,
Kim
,
J.
,
Lu
,
Y.
,
Shin
,
D.
,
Yang
,
Z.
, and
Oh
,
Y.
,
2022
, “
Spatial-Temporal Modeling Using Deep Learning for Real-Time Monitoring of Additive Manufacturing
,”
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, p.
V002T02A019
.
9.
Ko
,
H.
,
Witherell
,
P.
,
Lu
,
Y.
,
Kim
,
S.
, and
Rosen
,
D. W.
,
2021
, “
Machine Learning and Knowledge Graph Based Design Rule Construction for Additive Manufacturing
,”
Addit. Manuf.
,
37
, p.
101620
.
10.
Qi
,
X.
,
Chen
,
G.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Cheng
,
X.
, and
Li
,
C.
,
2019
, “
Applying Neural-Network-Based Machine Learning to Additive Manufacturing: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives
,”
Engineering
,
5
(
4
), pp.
721
729
.
11.
Wang
,
C.
,
Tan
,
X. P.
,
Tor
,
S. B.
, and
Lim
,
C. S.
,
2020
, “
Machine Learning in Additive Manufacturing: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives
,”
Addit. Manuf.
,
36
, p.
101538
.
12.
Kim
,
S.
,
Rosen
,
D. W.
,
Witherell
,
P.
, and
Ko
,
H.
,
2019
, “
A Design for Additive Manufacturing Ontology to Support Manufacturability Analysis
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
19
(
4
), p.
041014
.
13.
Ko
,
H.
,
Witherell
,
P.
,
Ndiaye
,
N. Y.
, and
Lu
,
Y.
,
2019
, “
Machine Learning Based Continuous Knowledge Engineering for Additive Manufacturing
,”
2019 IEEE 15th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)
,
Vancouver, BC, Canada
,
Aug. 22–26
, pp.
648
54
.
14.
Yang
,
S.
,
Page
,
T.
, and
Zhao
,
Y. F.
,
2019
, “
Understanding the Role of Additive Manufacturing Knowledge in Stimulating Design Innovation for Novice Designers
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
141
(
2
), p.
021703
.
15.
Hagedorn
,
T. J.
,
Krishnamurty
,
S.
, and
Grosse
,
I. R.
,
2018
, “
A Knowledge-Based Method for Innovative Design for Additive Manufacturing Supported by Modular Ontologies
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
18
(
2
), p.
021009
.
16.
Dinar
,
M.
, and
Rosen
,
D. W.
,
2017
, “
A Design for Additive Manufacturing Ontology
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
17
(
2
).
17.
Roh
,
B.-M.
,
Kumara
,
S. R.
,
Witherell
,
P.
, and
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
2021
, “
Ontology-Based Process Map for Metal Additive Manufacturing
,”
J. Mater. Eng. Perform.
,
30
(
12
), pp.
8784
8797
.
18.
Roh
,
B.-M.
,
Kumara
,
S. R.
,
Yang
,
H.
,
Simpson
,
T. W.
,
Witherell
,
P.
, and
Lu
,
Y.
,
2021
, “
In-Situ Observation Selection for Quality Management in Metal Additive Manufacturing
,”
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, p.
V002T02A069
.
19.
Sanfilippo
,
E. M.
,
Belkadi
,
F.
, and
Bernard
,
A.
,
2019
, “
Ontology-Based Knowledge Representation for Additive Manufacturing
,”
Comput. Ind.
,
109
, pp.
182
194
.
20.
Lu
,
Y.
,
Yang
,
Z.
,
Eddy
,
D.
, and
Krishnamurty
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Self-Improving Additive Manufacturing Knowledge Management
,”
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, p.
V01BT02A016
.
21.
Park
,
H.
,
Ko
,
H.
,
Lee
,
Y.-t. T.
,
Feng
,
S.
,
Witherell
,
P.
, and
Cho
,
H.
,
2021
, “
Collaborative Knowledge Management to Identify Data Analytics Opportunities in Additive Manufacturing
,”
J. Intell. Manuf.
,
34
(
2
), pp.
1
24
.
22.
Gribova
,
V.
,
Kulchin
,
Y.
,
Nikitin
,
A.
, and
Timchenko
,
V.
,
2020
, “
The Concept of Support for Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing on the Basis of Artificial Intelligence Methods
,”
Russian Conference on Artificial Intelligence
,
Boston, MA
,
Aug. 20–23
, pp.
403
415
.
23.
Safdar
,
M.
,
Xie
,
J.
,
Ko
,
H.
,
Lu
,
Y.
,
Lamouche
,
G.
, and
Zhao
,
Y. F.
,
2023
, “
Transferability Analysis of Data-Driven Additive Manufacturing Knowledge: A Case Study Between Powder Bed Fusion and Directed Energy Deposition
,”
International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
, p.
V002T02A078
.
24.
Liu
,
S.
,
Stebner
,
A. P.
,
Kappes
,
B. B.
, and
Zhang
,
X.
,
2021
, “
Machine Learning for Knowledge Transfer Across Multiple Metals Additive Manufacturing Printers
,”
Addit. Manuf.
,
39
, p.
101877
.
25.
Zhang
,
H.
,
Choi
,
J. P.
,
Moon
,
S. K.
, and
Ngo
,
T. H.
,
2021
, “
A Knowledge Transfer Framework to Support Rapid Process Modeling in Aerosol Jet Printing
,”
Adv. Eng. Inform.
,
48
, p.
101264
.
26.
Guo
,
S.
,
Zamiela
,
C.
, and
Bian
,
L.
,
2023
, “
Knowledge-Transfer-Enabled Porosity Prediction for New Part Geometry in Laser Metal Deposition
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
,
103
, pp.
64
77
.
27.
Xie
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
C.
,
Sage
,
M.
,
Safdar
,
M.
, and
Zhao
,
Y. F.
,
2023
, “
A Sequential Cross-Product Knowledge Accumulation, Extraction and Transfer Framework for Machine Learning-Based Production Process Modelling
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
, pp.
1
21
.
28.
Tang
,
Y.
,
Dehaghani
,
M. R.
, and
Wang
,
G. G.
,
2022
, “
Review of Transfer Learning in Modeling Additive Manufacturing Processes
,”
Addit. Manuf.
,
61
, pp.
103357
103373
.
29.
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Safdar
,
M.
,
Xie
,
J.
,
Li
,
J.
,
Sage
,
M.
, and
Zhao
,
Y. F.
,
2022
, “
A Systematic Review on Data of Additive Manufacturing for Machine Learning Applications: The Data Quality, Type, Preprocessing, and Management
,”
J. Intell. Manuf.
,
34
(
8
), pp.
1
36
.
30.
Safdar
,
M.
,
Lamouche
,
G.
,
Paul
,
P. P.
,
Wood
,
G.
, and
Zhao
,
Y. F.
,
2023
,
Engineering of Additive Manufacturing Features for Data-Driven Solutions: Sources, Techniques, Pipelines, and Applications
,
Springer Nature
,
Cham, Switzerland
.
31.
Safdar
,
M.
,
Lamouche
,
G.
,
Paul
,
P. P.
,
Wood
,
G.
, and
Zhao
,
Y. F.
,
2023
, “Feature Engineering in Additive Manufacturing,”
Engineering of Additive Manufacturing Features for Data-Driven Solutions: Sources, Techniques, Pipelines, and Applications
,
Springer Nature Switzerland
,
Cham
, pp.
17
43
.
32.
Xie
,
J.
,
Sage
,
M.
, and
Zhao
,
Y. F.
,
2023
, “
Feature Selection and Feature Learning in Machine Learning Applications for Gas Turbines: A Review
,”
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.
,
117
, p.
105591
.
33.
Bang
,
S. H.
,
Ak
,
R.
,
Narayanan
,
A.
,
Lee
,
Y. T.
, and
Cho
,
H.
,
2019
, “
A Survey on Knowledge Transfer for Manufacturing Data Analytics
,”
Comput. Ind.
,
104
, pp.
116
130
.
34.
Yang
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Dai
,
W.
, and
Pan
,
S. J.
,
2020
,
Transfer Learning
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
35.
Lane
,
B.
, and
Yeung
,
H.
,
2020
, “
Process Monitoring Dataset From the Additive Manufacturing Metrology Testbed (AMMT): Overhang Part X4
,”
J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol.
,
125
, pp.
1
18
.
36.
Marshall
,
G. J.
,
Thompson
,
S. M.
, and
Shamsaei
,
N.
,
2016
, “
Data Indicating Temperature Response of Ti–6Al–4V Thin-Walled Structure During Its Additive Manufacture Via Laser Engineered Net Shaping
,”
Data Brief
,
7
, pp.
697
703
.
37.
Gulli
,
A.
, and
Pal
,
S.
,
2017
,
Deep Learning with Keras
,
Packt Publishing Ltd
,
Birmingham, UK
.
38.
Wiedemann
,
G.
,
Ruppert
,
E.
,
Jindal
,
R.
, and
Biemann
,
C.
,
2018
, “
Transfer Learning From LDA to BILSTM-CNN for Offensive Language Detection in Twitter
,”
14th Conference on Natural Language Processing KONVENS 2018, Vienna, Austria
, p. 85.
You do not currently have access to this content.